Ropivacaine Plasma Concentrations After Fascial Blocks in Elective Cardio-thoracic and Abdominal Surgery

NCT ID: NCT05592691

Last Updated: 2022-11-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-29

Study Completion Date

2024-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Primary aim: observe the incidence of systemic toxicity from local anesthetic (LAST) after performing fascial blocks in patients undergoing elective cardio-thoracic and abdominal surgery.

Secondary aim: describe the pharmacokinetic profile of the local anesthetic (ropivacaine) and assess peri-procedural complications, post-operative pain and opiate consumption in the first 24 hours.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Loco-regional anesthesia (LRA) procedures have acquired, in recent years, increasing importance in the peri-operative control of pain in the field of cardio-thoracic and abdominal surgery. To date, they are recognized as part of the multimodal analgesia underlying the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols as they have demonstrated a better efficacy in post-operative pain control than the use of opiates alone and allow a significant reduction in the use of opioids in the postoperative period.

The advent of ultrasound-guided LRA procedures has led to the development of numerous fascial blocks, which involve the injection, at the level of the muscle-fascial planes, of an abundant volume of low-concentration local anesthetic to allow spread to adjacent nerve structures. The fascial blocks represent a valid alternative to epidural analgesia for the control of postoperative pain in the thoracoabdominal area, as they are characterized by a rapid learning curve and a lower risk of periprocedural complications compared to neuraxial anesthesia procedures.

The main chest wall nerve blocks used in clinical practice include the pectoral nerve block (PECS1 and PECS2) and serrate anterior plane block (SAP) at the level of the anterior chest wall; the spinal erector plane (ESP) block and the paravertebral block at the level of the posterior thoracic wall.

LRA techniques also play a fundamental role in the field of abdominal surgery, especially in the context of multimodal analgesia, aiming to reduce consumption and, consequently, the secondary side effects of the use of opioids.

In the case of laparotomic major abdominal surgery, the use of epidural analgesia has been shown to be effective in reducing post-operative pain, opioid consumption, and recovery of gastrointestinal function, but has not shown a significant reduction in the duration of hospitalization and of post-operative complications.

Subarachnoid analgesia is mainly indicated in laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Numerous studies have shown an efficacy similar to epidural anesthesia in controlling pain and reducing opioid consumption as well as allowing early patient mobilization and a shorter length of hospital stay.

The transverse abdominal plane (TAP) block has a rapid learning curve and has been shown to be effective in controlling postoperative analgesia, reducing opioids consumption and reducing hospital stay.

The lumbar square (QoL) block has a greater efficacy than other abdominal wall blocks on the visceral component of pain. A recent meta-analysis demonstrated greater efficacy than TAP in the control of post-operative pain and guarantees a longer duration of analgesia.

The effectiveness of the anesthetic depends on its local action at the level of the nervous structures "wetted" by the drug; a variable amount of local anesthetic undergoes systemic absorption and might be responsible for part of the analgesic effect, but above all for the possible appearance of systemic side effects.10 The amount of drug redistributing in the blood depends on the total dose of the drug administered, the route of administration, and the vascularity of the injection site.

Ropivacaine is a long-acting amide local anesthetic frequently used in LRA procedures. Unlike other drugs of the same family, the levorotatory enantiomer S-Ropivacaine is characterized by reduced lipophilicity and this determines a lower risk of toxicity to the Central Nervous System (CNS) and cardiovascular system (CVS). The drug exhibits high plasma protein binding (α1-acid glycoprotein), linear absorption kinetics, hepatic metabolism, and renal elimination.

Systemic toxicity from Local anesthetic (LAST) represents a complication of local anesthetic administration and is directly dependent on the plasma concentration of the drug. The signs and symptoms of LAST occur progressively and mainly affect the CNS (visual disturbances, perioral hypoaesthesia, dizziness, euphoria, muscle stiffness, spasms, convulsions) and the CVS system (hypotension, bradycardia, arrhythmias, cardiac arrest).

The study aims to observe the onset of local anesthetic toxicity (LAST) after performing fascial blocks in patients undergoing elective cardiothoracic and abdominal surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Local Anesthetic Toxicity Regional Anesthesia Morbidity Postoperative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Study Cohort

Patients undergoing fascial blocks in elective cardio-thoracic and abdominal surgery.

Fascial block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The end of the drug infusion will be considered the time zero (T0); subsequently blood samples (4ml) will be taken at pre-established time intervals (after 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes). Blood samples will be collected in test tubes and centrifuged within 1 hour of collection; subsequently they will be stored at a low temperature and transported to the reference analysis laboratory.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fascial block

The end of the drug infusion will be considered the time zero (T0); subsequently blood samples (4ml) will be taken at pre-established time intervals (after 5, 15, 30, 60, 120 and 180 minutes). Blood samples will be collected in test tubes and centrifuged within 1 hour of collection; subsequently they will be stored at a low temperature and transported to the reference analysis laboratory.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing elective cardio-thoracic and abdominal surgery with indications for the execution of fascial block
* Signature of the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria

* Lack of informed consent form.
* Previous neuropsychiatric pathologies or neuropathies of the back / trunk
* Severe renal insufficiency (GFR \<30ml / min)
* Severe hepatic insufficiency or alteration of liver enzymes
* Contraindications to LRA procedures (injection site infection, coagulopathy, allergy / hypersensitivity to local anesthetics)
* Pregnancy
* Hypoalbuminemia
* Hospitalization in intensive care and / or post-operative sedation\> 24 hours
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Turin, Italy

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Luca Brazzi

Full Professor, Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Edoardo Ceraolo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

Turin, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Luca Brazzi, Professor

Role: CONTACT

(+39) 011 633 5505

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Luca Brazzi, PhD

Role: primary

+39 011 6335501

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Crumley S, Schraag S. The role of local anaesthetic techniques in ERAS protocols for thoracic surgery. J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1998-2004. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.02.48.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29707356 (View on PubMed)

Chin KJ, Versyck B, Pawa A. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks of the chest wall: a state-of-the-art review. Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76 Suppl 1:110-126. doi: 10.1111/anae.15276.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33426660 (View on PubMed)

Jack JM, McLellan E, Versyck B, Englesakis MF, Chin KJ. The role of serratus anterior plane and pectoral nerves blocks in cardiac surgery, thoracic surgery and trauma: a qualitative systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2020 Oct;75(10):1372-1385. doi: 10.1111/anae.15000. Epub 2020 Feb 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32062870 (View on PubMed)

Nagaraja PS, Ragavendran S, Singh NG, Asai O, Bhavya G, Manjunath N, Rajesh K. Comparison of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia with bilateral erector spinae plane block for perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery. Ann Card Anaesth. 2018 Jul-Sep;21(3):323-327. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_16_18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30052229 (View on PubMed)

Hughes MJ, Ventham NT, McNally S, Harrison E, Wigmore S. Analgesia after open abdominal surgery in the setting of enhanced recovery surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014 Dec;149(12):1224-30. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.210.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25317633 (View on PubMed)

Leone S, Di Cianni S, Casati A, Fanelli G. Pharmacology, toxicology, and clinical use of new long acting local anesthetics, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Acta Biomed. 2008 Aug;79(2):92-105.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18788503 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRAST

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study of Postoperative ICC Analgesia
NCT04939545 COMPLETED PHASE3
Local Anesthetic Infusion and Sternotomy
NCT00802048 TERMINATED PHASE3