Impact of Intraperitonael Nebulization of Local Anesthetic on Postoperative Pain Associated With Laparoscopic Surgery

NCT ID: NCT01512914

Last Updated: 2012-01-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-05-31

Study Completion Date

2009-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Studies evaluating intraperitoneal local anesthetic instillation for pain relief after laparoscopic procedures have provided conflicting results. This randomized, double-blind study was designed to assess the effects of a novel intraperitoneal local anesthetic administration technique using nebulization on pain relief after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Studies evaluating intraperitoneal local anesthetic (LA) instillation for pain relief after laparoscopic surgery have provided conflicting results. One of the factors that might contribute to failure of the instillation technique may be related to inadequate distribution of local anesthetic throughout the peritoneal surface. In contrast, nebulization should provide a uniform spread of drugs throughout the peritoneal cavity and thus may be beneficial to improve pain relief after laparoscopic procedures. The investigators reported that a microvibration-based nebulization device (Aeroneb Pro® system, Aerogen, Galway, Ireland) could be used for ropivacaine delivery into the insufflation gas required to create pneumorpeitoneum. The investigators hypothesized that intraperitoneal ropivacaine nebulization would provide superior pain relief than ropivacaine instillation after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. This randomized, double blind, controlled clinical trial was designed to assess the analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine nebulization before or after surgery compared with intraperitoneal ropivacaine instillation and placebo after gynecologic laparoscopic procedures.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

CONTROL group

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

saline

Intervention Type DRUG

preoperative instillation of saline 20 ml and nebulization of saline before and after surgery

PREOPERATIVE nebulization

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ropivacaine 30 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

preoperative instillation of saline 20 ml, nebulization of ropivacaine 1% 3 ml (30 mg) before surgery and nebulization of saline 3 ml after surgery

POSTOPERATIVE nebulization

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ropivacaine 30 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

preoperative instillation of saline 20 ml, preoperative nebulization of saline 3 ml and nebulization of ropivacaine 1% 3 ml (30 mg) after surgery

INSTILLATION group

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine 100 mg

Intervention Type DRUG

preoperative instillation of ropivacaine 0,5% 20 ml (100 mg) and nebulization of saline 3 ml before and after surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine 30 mg

preoperative instillation of saline 20 ml, nebulization of ropivacaine 1% 3 ml (30 mg) before surgery and nebulization of saline 3 ml after surgery

Intervention Type DRUG

Ropivacaine 30 mg

preoperative instillation of saline 20 ml, preoperative nebulization of saline 3 ml and nebulization of ropivacaine 1% 3 ml (30 mg) after surgery

Intervention Type DRUG

Ropivacaine 100 mg

preoperative instillation of ropivacaine 0,5% 20 ml (100 mg) and nebulization of saline 3 ml before and after surgery

Intervention Type DRUG

saline

preoperative instillation of saline 20 ml and nebulization of saline before and after surgery

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Females 18-70 years old, ASA score 1 - 3;
* scheduled for laparoscopic operative surgery in the Obstetrics and Gynecology unit;
* free from pain in preoperative period, without habitual analgesic use;
* without cognitive impairment or mental retardation, who gave a written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Females under 18 or over 70;
* ASA 4 or 5;
* emergency/urgency criteria, postoperative admission in a intensive care unit with sedation or ventilatory assistance; cognitive impairment or mental retardation;
* habitual analgesic use; progressive degenerative diseases of the CNS;
* convulsions or chronic therapy with antiepileptic drugs;
* severe hepatic or renal impairment;
* pregnancy or lactation;
* allergy to one of the specific substances used in the study;
* acute infectious disease or inflammatory chronic disease, alcohol or drug addiction;
* any kind of communication problem;
* neurologic or psychiatric disease;
* no written informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

San Gerardo Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Pablo Mauricio Ingelmo M.D.

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pablo M Ingelmo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

San Gerardo Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

San Gerardo Hospital

Monza, MB, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Goldstein A, Grimault P, Henique A, Keller M, Fortin A, Darai E. Preventing postoperative pain by local anesthetic instillation after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery: a placebo-controlled comparison of bupivacaine and ropivacaine. Anesth Analg. 2000 Aug;91(2):403-7. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200008000-00032.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 10910857 (View on PubMed)

Alkhamesi NA, Peck DH, Lomax D, Darzi AW. Intraperitoneal aerosolization of bupivacaine reduces postoperative pain in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized prospective controlled double-blinded clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2007 Apr;21(4):602-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-9087-6. Epub 2006 Dec 16.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17180268 (View on PubMed)

Greib N, Schlotterbeck H, Dow WA, Joshi GP, Geny B, Diemunsch PA. An evaluation of gas humidifying devices as a means of intraperitoneal local anesthetic administration for laparoscopic surgery. Anesth Analg. 2008 Aug;107(2):549-51. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e318176fa1c.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18633034 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AR HSG 01-2008

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.