Screening For Asymptomatic Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Among High-Risk Diabetic Patients Using CT Angiography, Following Core 64
NCT ID: NCT00488033
Last Updated: 2017-03-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
900 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-06-30
2014-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients in the Asymptomatic Screening Arm will undergo CT screening for either coronary calcium scoring or multi-slice CT angiography as well as be placed on one of two medical regimens. Patients will be followed by telephone at six-month intervals for a minimum of one year for both primary and secondary outcomes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis in Asymptomatic Diabetic Subjects
NCT02109835
Validation Study of Coronary CT Angiography as a Screening Tool in Asymptomatic Diabetes
NCT00431977
Cardiac CT's Role in Asymptomatic Patients With Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome
NCT01564485
A Low-dose Radiation and Contrast Agent Exposure Protocol for Coronary CTA in Diabetic Patients
NCT04342455
Screening and Intervention for Subclinical Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT05700877
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Management of Patients Randomized to the Asymptomatic Screening Arm: Subjects randomized to the Asymptomatic Screening arm will undergo initial CT screening in the following fashion:
* Subjects with serum creatinine of \< 2.0 mg/dl (men) or \<1.8 mg/dL (women) will be screened using multi-slice CT angiography with contrast.
* Those with serum creatinine ≥ 2.0 mg/dl (men) or \>1.8 mg/dL (women) will be screened without contrast to obtain a coronary calcium score. Further cardiac screening will be determined based on these results.
Subjects Receiving Multi-Slice CT Angiography (serum creatinine of \< 2.0 mg/dl (men) or \<1.8 mg/dL (women)): Subjects severe stenosis will proceed to coronary angiography and revascularization as needed. Subjects with moderate stenosis will be referred for adenosine stress cardiac MRI. If ischemia is detected, they will also be referred for coronary angiography. Subjects with either mild stenosis or normal coronary arteries will receive no further imaging studies.
Subjects Undergoing CT Evaluation for Coronary Calcium Scoring (serum creatinine ≥ 2.0 mg/dl (men) or \>1.8 mg/dL (women): Subjects with coronary calcium scores \>100 or \>75th percentile will be referred for adenosine stress cardiac MRI. If ischemia is detected, they will be referred for coronary angiography. Subjects with coronary calcium scores = 0-10 or 11-100 and \<75th percentile will receive no further imaging studies.
Medical Management (Only for those patients randomized to the Asymptomatic Screening Arm): In addition to the imaging studies and potential coronary revascularization procedures performed as described above, all subjects will be placed on one of two medical regimens:
* Standard Appropriate DM Care and
* Aggressive Risk Factor Reduction Care.
Standard Appropriate DM Care: Subjects assigned to this form of medical care will be managed by their primary physicians. This type of care will consist of targeting the goals proposed by Intermountain Healthcare for all patients with diabetes. These include the following three targets: HgA1C \<7.0%, LDL cholesterol \<100 mg/dL and Systolic BP\<130 mm Hg. Subjects assigned to Standard Care will include all control subjects, as well as all screened subjects with either a normal CT angiogram or a coronary calcium score = 0-10.
Aggressive Risk Factor Reduction Care: Subjects assigned to this form of medical care, in addition to standard medical care provided by their primary physicians, will also be managed by their primary physicians, but will receive more aggressive risk factor reduction management according to a set of guidelines that will be given to the primary physicians. This aggressive management strategy, designed to address the increased medical risk among the asymptomatic diabetics with detected vascular disease, will consist of more aggressive glucose and lipid targets than is in the Standard Care protocols and specific medication algorithms designed to accomplish these more aggressive targets.
Follow-Up After enrollment into the protocol, all subjects will be followed for a minimum of one year. Follow-up will occur by telephone at six-month intervals. Outcomes will be ascertained by directly questioning the patient and by review of medical records. All primary outcomes will be adjudicated by an independent events committee.
Statistical Analysis Both an intention-to-treat analysis and a by protocol analysis will be performed. The intention-to-treat analysis will be the primary analysis and will be defined as all those randomized to scan versus all those randomized to control regardless of what actually happened. The by protocol analysis will be defined as all of those who actually got the protocol scan versus those who did not get the scan. Those who did not get the scan includes all those randomized to the control arm. If they went outside of the study and got a scan anyway, this will be considered to be for clinical indications and will still be in the non-protocol scan group. For those who were randomized to get the scan but never did, evaluation of their baseline characteristics will be made and if they did not differ from those who actually got the scan or from those who were randomized to control, then they will be included the didn't get scanned group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
FACTORIAL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Standard of Care
No interventions assigned to this group
2
CT Angiography
CT Angiography
If results indicate blockage, patients will receive interventional assessment (i.e., angiography) and treatment if indicated. All patients will receive aggressive treatment for type II diabetes (hemoglobin A1C) and lipids.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CT Angiography
If results indicate blockage, patients will receive interventional assessment (i.e., angiography) and treatment if indicated. All patients will receive aggressive treatment for type II diabetes (hemoglobin A1C) and lipids.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age: Males ≥ 40 years; Females ≥45 years with: History of diabetes mellitus (prior documentation of fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or hemoglobin A1C \> 6.5%), either type 1 or type 2, documented for at least 5 years and on medication for at least one year.
3. The patient or legally authorized representative must sign a written informed consent, prior to the procedure, using a form that is approved by the local Institutional Review Board.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Symptomatic cerebral vascular disease (history of TIA, CVA, or cerebrovascular \[carotid or cerebral arteries\] revascularization)
3. Symptomatic peripheral vascular disease (history of claudication, amputation, or peripheral \[including renal arteries\] arterial revascularization)
4. Treatment with any other investigational drug within the previous 30 days
5. Any therapy or condition that would pose a risk to the patient or make it difficult to comply with study requirements.
6. Pregnant and/or lactating women, and women of child bearing potential not using acceptable means of contraception. Women of childbearing potential must be using adequate measures of contraception (as determined by the Investigator) to avoid pregnancy and should be highly unlikely to conceive during the study period. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screen.
7. Any life threatening condition/significant co-morbidity such that primary screening is inappropriate.
\-
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Deseret Foundation
OTHER
Toshiba America Medical Systems, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Joseph B Muhlestein, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Intermountain Healthcare
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Muhlestein JB, Lappe DL, Lima JA, Rosen BD, May HT, Knight S, Bluemke DA, Towner SR, Le V, Bair TL, Vavere AL, Anderson JL. Effect of screening for coronary artery disease using CT angiography on mortality and cardiac events in high-risk patients with diabetes: the FACTOR-64 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 Dec 3;312(21):2234-43. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15825.
Kwan AC, May HT, Cater G, Sibley CT, Rosen BD, Lima JA, Rodriguez K, Lappe DL, Muhlestein JB, Anderson JL, Bluemke DA. Coronary artery plaque volume and obesity in patients with diabetes: the factor-64 study. Radiology. 2014 Sep;272(3):690-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.14140611. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
128-026
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.