Perfusion Imaging and CT -Understanding Relative Efficacy

NCT ID: NCT00486447

Last Updated: 2017-08-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

249 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-06-30

Study Completion Date

2009-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To determine the relative efficacy of Cardiac Computed Tomography Angiography (CCTA) and Single Positron Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) in patients with an intermediate risk of CAD.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is a prospective, multi-center, within-subject comparative study. One hundred fifty (150) subjects with CATH procedures are needed in the study. Approximately 300 subjects who meet all of the inclusion/exclusion criteria will be enrolled. The study population will consist of subjects with symptoms suspected of and at intermediate-risk for ischemic heart disease, which are referred for MPS for a definitive diagnosis of CAD.

Each subject will undergo the following procedures:

* A Myocardial Perfusion Study (MPS) procedure, as standard of care;
* An IV contrast-enhanced cardiac CT (CCTA) procedure;
* A CATH procedure when the MPS and/or cardiac CT examination is deemed positive or equivocal and at the discretion of the referring physicians, as a standard-of-care procedure.

When both the MPS and CCTA are normal, the subject is not required to undergo a CATH procedure, but will enter into follow-up. The research staff at each site will perform follow-up for each subject at 12 months (± 15 days) and 24 months (± 15 days) and 36 months (± 15 days) after the completion of the cardiac CT procedure.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Imaging

General imaging subjects receiving CT exams

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

64 Channel VCT

Intervention Type DEVICE

cardiac CT angiography exam

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

64 Channel VCT

cardiac CT angiography exam

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with an intermediate probability risk for coronary artery disease.
* Subject has symptoms of suspected ischemic heart disease.
* Subject is at intermediate risk for coronary artery disease

Exclusion Criteria

* The subject has undergone a prior CCTA within 6 months prior to entering the study.
* The subject has a documented history of CAD by CATH, myocardial infarction (MI), metal stent placement in any of the coronary vessels, or a previous coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) procedure
* The subject has hemodynamic or active clinical instability:

* Acute chest pain (sudden onset);
* Cardiac shock;
* Unstable blood pressure (BP);
* Severe congestive heart failure or acute pulmonary edema.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

GE Healthcare

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Matthew Budoff

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

LA Biomedical Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

GE Healthcare

Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GE-189-03

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Thoracoabdominal Arortic CTA Study
NCT02291718 COMPLETED PHASE4