Regional Anesthesia Military Battlefield Pain Outcomes Study
NCT ID: NCT00431847
Last Updated: 2017-05-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
386 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2007-10-31
2014-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sevoflurane-Remifentanil Interaction: Multiple Response Surfaces, Validation of Calibration Stimuli, Validation of the Intraoperative Isobole Concept and Investigating Remifentanil Induced Opioid Tolerance
NCT00522587
Isoflurane at Subanesthetic Concentrations - 6
NCT00000254
Effects of Subanesthetic Concentrations of Isoflurane/Nitrous Oxide - 3
NCT00000251
Inhalational Anesthesia and Precipitation of Dementia: is There a Link?
NCT01903421
Analgesia-First Sedation in Trauma Patients
NCT05751863
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Adequate pain management for combat casualties balances the need for emergent, life-saving care with the urgency to remove soldiers from harm's way. Control of pain in traumatic battlefield situations may be impossible until safe evacuation to a surgical facility is achieved and a wounded soldier can receive general anesthesia. Recent evidence suggests that neural plasticity in the central nervous system coupled with hyperstimulation of central neuronal pathways lead to neuropathological remodeling. This neural rewiring may result in chronic pain for patients who have experienced severe, unrelieved acute pain. In addition, the stress of combat along with the suffering of prolonged uncontrolled pain may contribute to psychological disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and substance abuse.
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of early and aggressive advanced regional anesthesia on the chronic neuropathic pain, health related quality of life, and mental health of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) Veterans who have suffered a major limb injury in combat. An additional aim of this study is to quantify and characterize the short-term and long-term effects of traumatic combat limb injuries on post-injury acute pain, chronic pain, health related quality of life, functional status, social reintegration, psychological adjustment, and substance abuse behaviors in a population of injured military personnel.
METHOD:
This study employs a cohort repeated measures study design involving prospective data collection at scheduled intervals. Interviews with participants provide data on pain outcomes, psychiatric morbidities, and quality of life. Follow up evaluations conclude at the two year anniversary of the start of combat injury rehabilitation. Medical records information collected retrospectively from armed services treatment facilities provide data on the use of pain management therapies as well as individual responses to regional anesthesia.
IMPLICATIONS FOR RESULTS:
The findings of this study may impact the clinical field by providing information on the effectiveness and benefits of early advanced regional anesthesia for chronic pain control. This study may also provide data to determine whether regional anesthesia pain treatments prevent or reduce the development of psychological maladjustment disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and substance abuse in a population of military personnel with combat limb injuries.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1
Soldiers with one or more severely injured, mangled or amputated limbs from the Iraq/Afghanistan war aggressively treated with regional anesthesia for pain control.
Regional Anesthesia
Subject received regional anesthesia to affected limb(s) within 72 hours of traumatic event.
Group 2
Soldiers with one or more severely injured, mangled or amputated limbs from the Iraq/Afghanistan war receiving standard treatment for pain control.
Standard Pain Management Protocol
Intermittent dosing of analgesics and anxiolytics instituted prior to continuous intravenously dosing which was individually titrated to patient care goals.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Regional Anesthesia
Subject received regional anesthesia to affected limb(s) within 72 hours of traumatic event.
Standard Pain Management Protocol
Intermittent dosing of analgesics and anxiolytics instituted prior to continuous intravenously dosing which was individually titrated to patient care goals.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Cognitive deficits
* Inability to concentrate
* Poor judgment and impulse control
* Substantial hearing loss
* Bilateral upper extremity amputation with no alternate means to complete the survey forms
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
FED
Brooke Army Medical Center
FED
University of Pennsylvania
OTHER
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rollin M Gallagher, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pain Management Service
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Pain Management Service
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Brooke Army Medical Center & US Army Institute of Surgical Research
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gallagher RM, Polomano RC, Giordano NA, Farrar JT, Guo W, Taylor L, Oslin D, Goff BJ, Buckenmaier CC. Prospective cohort study examining the use of regional anesthesia for early pain management after combat-related extremity injury. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Sep 27:rapm-2019-100773. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100773. Online ahead of print.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
D4506-I
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
NCT01710475
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: nct_alias
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.