Regional Anesthesia Military Battlefield Pain Outcomes Study

NCT ID: NCT00431847

Last Updated: 2017-05-15

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

386 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-10-31

Study Completion Date

2014-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to examine the short and long-term benefits of implementing early regional anesthesia techniques for pain control after a major traumatic injury to one or more extremities during combat in the Iraqi/Afghanistan war, including the effects on acute and chronic pain, quality of life, and mental health.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND:

Adequate pain management for combat casualties balances the need for emergent, life-saving care with the urgency to remove soldiers from harm's way. Control of pain in traumatic battlefield situations may be impossible until safe evacuation to a surgical facility is achieved and a wounded soldier can receive general anesthesia. Recent evidence suggests that neural plasticity in the central nervous system coupled with hyperstimulation of central neuronal pathways lead to neuropathological remodeling. This neural rewiring may result in chronic pain for patients who have experienced severe, unrelieved acute pain. In addition, the stress of combat along with the suffering of prolonged uncontrolled pain may contribute to psychological disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and substance abuse.

OBJECTIVE:

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of early and aggressive advanced regional anesthesia on the chronic neuropathic pain, health related quality of life, and mental health of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) and Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) Veterans who have suffered a major limb injury in combat. An additional aim of this study is to quantify and characterize the short-term and long-term effects of traumatic combat limb injuries on post-injury acute pain, chronic pain, health related quality of life, functional status, social reintegration, psychological adjustment, and substance abuse behaviors in a population of injured military personnel.

METHOD:

This study employs a cohort repeated measures study design involving prospective data collection at scheduled intervals. Interviews with participants provide data on pain outcomes, psychiatric morbidities, and quality of life. Follow up evaluations conclude at the two year anniversary of the start of combat injury rehabilitation. Medical records information collected retrospectively from armed services treatment facilities provide data on the use of pain management therapies as well as individual responses to regional anesthesia.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESULTS:

The findings of this study may impact the clinical field by providing information on the effectiveness and benefits of early advanced regional anesthesia for chronic pain control. This study may also provide data to determine whether regional anesthesia pain treatments prevent or reduce the development of psychological maladjustment disorders such as post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, and substance abuse in a population of military personnel with combat limb injuries.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Anxiety Disorders Complex Regional Pain Syndrome Type II Depressive Disorders Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Substance Abuse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group 1

Soldiers with one or more severely injured, mangled or amputated limbs from the Iraq/Afghanistan war aggressively treated with regional anesthesia for pain control.

Regional Anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Subject received regional anesthesia to affected limb(s) within 72 hours of traumatic event.

Group 2

Soldiers with one or more severely injured, mangled or amputated limbs from the Iraq/Afghanistan war receiving standard treatment for pain control.

Standard Pain Management Protocol

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Intermittent dosing of analgesics and anxiolytics instituted prior to continuous intravenously dosing which was individually titrated to patient care goals.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Regional Anesthesia

Subject received regional anesthesia to affected limb(s) within 72 hours of traumatic event.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard Pain Management Protocol

Intermittent dosing of analgesics and anxiolytics instituted prior to continuous intravenously dosing which was individually titrated to patient care goals.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

No RA Group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Major injury in one or more extremities requiring hospitalization and inpatient rehabilitation.

Exclusion Criteria

* Major head trauma
* Cognitive deficits
* Inability to concentrate
* Poor judgment and impulse control
* Substantial hearing loss
* Bilateral upper extremity amputation with no alternate means to complete the survey forms
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Brooke Army Medical Center

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rollin M Gallagher, MD MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Pain Management Service

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Walter Reed National Military Medical Center

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Pain Management Service

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Brooke Army Medical Center & US Army Institute of Surgical Research

Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gallagher RM, Polomano RC, Giordano NA, Farrar JT, Guo W, Taylor L, Oslin D, Goff BJ, Buckenmaier CC. Prospective cohort study examining the use of regional anesthesia for early pain management after combat-related extremity injury. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Sep 27:rapm-2019-100773. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100773. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31563880 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D4506-I

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

NCT01710475

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: nct_alias

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Emergence Agitation of Sevoflurane in Pediatric
NCT06830564 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Ketamine Versus Propofol as ICU Sedation
NCT06243822 COMPLETED PHASE4