Ketamine Infusion as Sedative Analgesic in Severe ARDS

NCT ID: NCT04818827

Last Updated: 2021-03-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

124 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-01

Study Completion Date

2021-02-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate whether ketamine is a safe sedative-analgesic agent to be used in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting as compared to traditionally used agents such as propofol, opioids, and midazolam

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to the 2018 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the prevention and management of pain, agitation/sedation, delirium, immobility, and sleep disruption in adult patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), nonbenzodiazepine sedatives (such as propofol and dexmedetomidine) are preferable to benzodiazepine sedatives (such as midazolam and lorazepam) in critically ill, mechanically ventilated patients. Moreover, continuous use of benzodiazepine (more than 48 hours) has been associated with a risk of prolonged sedation and delirium. On the other hand, though propofol has a remarkable safety profile, it carries unfavorable side effects such as dose-dependent hypotension, hypertriglyceridemia, pancreatitis, and propofol syndrome (which is a rare but potentially fatal complication, associated with high-dose propofol infusions, and characterized by severe metabolic acidosis and circulatory collapse).

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, an enormous number of patients required mechanical ventilation, which led to the shortage of traditional sedatives such as propofol, dexmedetomidine, midazolam, and lorazepam in the hospitals. In this challenging time, ketamine was used as an alternative sedative infusion. This study is to evaluate whether ketamine is safer compared to other sedatives in severe COVID related ARDS patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intensive Care Unit Syndrome Mechanical Ventilation Complication Sedatives and Hypnotics Causing Adverse Effects in Therapeutic Use Delirium

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ketamine group

This cohort includes patients who received ketamine as a sedative analgesic agent during mechanical ventilation

No interventions assigned to this group

Non Ketamine group

This cohort includes patients who received sedatives other than ketamine during mechanical ventilation

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 with an arterial partial pressure of oxygen divided by the inspired oxygen concentration (P/F) ratio \< 150 with a minimum 5 cm of positive end-expiratory pressure on a mechanical ventilator

Exclusion Criteria

* post-cardiac arrest status,
* premorbid diagnosis of dementia,
* dependency on extra-corporeal therapies prior to or during ICU stay
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

90 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Interfaith Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ramakanth Pata

Pulmonary Fellow

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

RAMAKANTH PATA, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Interfaith Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Interfaith Medical Center

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KISS 1.0

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Safety of Remifentanil Infusion
NCT01303627 COMPLETED PHASE4