Efficacy of Alogliptin With Pioglitazone (Actos®) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

NCT ID: NCT00395512

Last Updated: 2013-03-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

655 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-11-30

Study Completion Date

2008-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the combination of alogliptin, once daily (QD), and pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are inadequately controlled with diet and exercise alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There are approximately 19 million people in the United States who have been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, of which 90% to 95% is type 2. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes varies among racial and ethnic populations and has been shown to correlate with age, obesity, family history, history of gestational diabetes, and physical inactivity. Over the next decade, a marked increase in the number of adults with diabetes mellitus is expected, placing an ever-increasing burden on families and the health care system.

Current pharmacologic interventions for type 2 diabetes mellitus include a diverse range of antidiabetic medications with different mechanisms of action including insulin and insulin analogues, sulfonylureas, metformin, meglitinides, thiazolidinediones, inhibitors of alpha- glucosidase, analogs of glucagon-like peptide-1, and synthetic analogues of human amylin. Despite the variety of medications, many have clinically important or potentially life-threatening side effects, restricted use in many subpopulations, concerns with long-term tolerability, and challenges related to compliance due to side effects and route of administration. All of these reasons contribute to the difficulties patients have reaching the target glycosylated hemoglobin level less than 7%.

SYR-322 (alogliptin) is a selective, orally available inhibitor of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme is thought to be primarily responsible for the in vivo degradation of 2 peptide hormones released in response to nutrient ingestion, namely glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide. Both peptides exert important effects on islet beta cells to stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion as well as regulating beta cell proliferation and cytoprotection. Glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, inhibits gastric emptying, glucagon secretion, and food intake. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide has been shown to enhance insulin secretion by direct interaction with a glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide -specific receptor on islet beta cells. The glucose-lowering actions of glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, are preserved in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Pioglitazone (ACTOS®) is a thiazolidinedione developed by Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan) that is approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Pioglitazone is a selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist that decreases insulin resistance in the periphery and liver resulting in increased insulin-dependent glucose disposal and decreased hepatic glucose output.

As the rate of newly diagnosed cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to grow, so does the need for products that will provide better glycemic control and improved safety and tolerability. Alogliptin and pioglitazone have complementary actions. Alogliptin inhibits the degradation of glucagon-like peptide-1 by inhibiting the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV, thus augmenting glucose-dependent insulin secretion while pioglitazone is a peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitizer. Given the complementary mechanisms of action of alogliptin (stimulates insulin secretion) and pioglitazone (enhances insulin sensitivity), the addition of combination therapy in treatment naïve type 2 diabetes patients may potentially allow the patients to reach and maintain their glycosylated hemoglobin goal more effectively.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the combination of alogliptin with pioglitazone in patients who are inadequately controlled on diet and exercise alone. Study participation is anticipated to be approximately 8.5 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Alogliptin 25 mg QD

Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin tablets.

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo tablets.

Pioglitazone 30 mg QD

Pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone tablets.

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Matching placebo tablets.

Alogliptin 25 mg QD+ Pioglitazone 30 mg QD

Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin tablets.

Pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone tablets.

Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD + Pioglitazone 30 mg QD

Alogliptin 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Alogliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin tablets.

Pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone tablets.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alogliptin

Alogliptin tablets.

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone

Pioglitazone tablets.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Matching placebo tablets.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SYR-322 Actos AD4833

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Historical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes.
* Failed treatment with diet and exercise for at least 2 months prior to Screening.
* Is experiencing inadequate glycemic control as defined as glycosylated hemoglobin concentration between 7.5-11%, inclusive.
* Has received any antidiabetic therapy for less than 7 days within 3 months prior to Screening.
* Has a body mass index greater than or equal to 23 kg/m2 and less than or equal to45 kg/m2.
* Fasting C-peptide greater than or equal to 0.8 ng per mL.
* Regular use of other, non-excluded medications is allowed if participant is on a stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to Screening.
* Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
* Must be willing and able to monitor their blood concentrations with a home glucose monitor.

Exclusion Criteria

* Systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 160 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 100 mmHg.
* Hemoglobin less than or equal to 12 g per dL for males and less than or equal to 10 g per dL for females.
* Alanine aminotransferase greater than or equal to 2.5times the upper limit of normal.
* Serum creatinine greater than 2.0 mg per dL.
* Thyroid stimulating hormone level greater than the upper limit of normal range.
* Major illness or debility that in the investigator's opinion prohibits the subject from completing the study.
* Urine albumin to creatinine ratio of greater than 1000 ug per mg at Screening. If elevated, the subject may be rescreened within 1 week.
* History of cancer, other than squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, that has not been in full remission for at least 5 years prior to Screening
* History of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within 6 months prior to Screening.
* History of gastroparesis.
* Has New York Heart Association Class I to IV heart failure regardless of therapy.
* History of coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to Screening.
* History of any hemoglobinopathy that may affect determination of glycosylated hemoglobin.
* History of infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus.
* History of a psychiatric disorder that will affect participant's ability to participate in the study.
* History of angioedema in association with use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor inhibitors.
* Any alteration in angiotensin-II receptor inhibitors within 2 months prior to Randomization, if applicable.
* History of alcohol (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than 4 alcoholic drinks per day) or substance abuse (defined as illicit drug use) within 2 years prior to Screening.
* Received any investigational drug within 30 days prior to Screening or a history of receipt of an investigational antidiabetic drug within 3 months prior to Screening.
* Previously participated in an investigational study of SYR-322.
* Glycosylated hemoglobin concentration between 7.5-11%, inclusive, and a fasting plasma glucose less than 310 mg per dL.
* At least 75% compliant with the single-blind placebo regimen during the run-in/stabilization period.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

VP, Biological Sciences

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Columbiana, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Hueytown, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Northport, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Searcy, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Foothill Ranch, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Mateo, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Melbourne, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Port Charlotte, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sebastian, Florida, United States

Site Status

South Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Winter Haven, Florida, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Barnesville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Libertyville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Bossier City, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Elkton, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Prince Frederick, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Towson, Maryland, United States

Site Status

North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Bay City, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Benzonia, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Portage, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Picayune, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Billings, Montana, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Hamilton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Cicero, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mooresville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Northeast, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Franklin, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ashland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Harleysville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Havertown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Northern Cambria, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Penndel, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Florence, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Taylors, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Williamston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Morristown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Colleyville, Texas, United States

Site Status

Conroe, Texas, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Euless, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Garland, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Katy, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Seguin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugarland, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tomball, Texas, United States

Site Status

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Lewisburg, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Cap. Fed., Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Chacabuco, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Morón, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Fitzroy, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Frankston, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

Site Status

Goiás, Goiás, Brazil

Site Status

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Belém, Pará, Brazil

Site Status

Maringá, RP, Brazil

Site Status

Marília, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Mogi das Cruzes, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Pleven, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Slavonski Brod, , Croatia

Site Status

Pärnu, , Estonia

Site Status

Guatemala City, , Guatemala

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Eger, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Makó, , Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Site Status

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Aurangabad, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Nagpur, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Site Status

Hadera, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Jaffa Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Nahariya, , Israel

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Kėdainiai, , Lithuania

Site Status

Aguascalientes, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bytom, , Poland

Site Status

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Gniewkowo, , Poland

Site Status

Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Łęczyca, , Poland

Site Status

Brasov, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Galati, , Romania

Site Status

Kazan', , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Belgrade, , Serbia

Site Status

Kragujevac, , Serbia

Site Status

Niš, , Serbia

Site Status

Interna Klinika II, Nitra Region, Slovakia

Site Status

Banska Bysterica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Lučenec, , Slovakia

Site Status

Riverside, , Slovakia

Site Status

Šahy, , Slovakia

Site Status

Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Site Status

East Lynne, Pretoria, South Africa

Site Status

Bellville, Western Province, South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, Western Province, South Africa

Site Status

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Brazil Bulgaria Chile Croatia Estonia Guatemala Hungary India Israel Latvia Lithuania Mexico New Zealand Poland Romania Russia Serbia Slovakia South Africa Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rosenstock J, Inzucchi SE, Seufert J, Fleck PR, Wilson CA, Mekki Q. Initial combination therapy with alogliptin and pioglitazone in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Nov;33(11):2406-8. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0159. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20724648 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2006-005492-17

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1113-8616

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

01-06-TL-322OPI-002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study of Combination Therapy With SYR-322
NCT01521962 COMPLETED PHASE3