Study of Alogliptin Combined With Pioglitazone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

NCT ID: NCT00286494

Last Updated: 2012-02-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

493 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-02-28

Study Completion Date

2007-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin, once daily (QD), combined with pioglitazone in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There are approximately 19 million people in the United States who have been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, of which 90% to 95% are type 2. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes varies among racial and ethnic populations and has been shown to correlate with age, obesity, family history, history of gestational diabetes, and physical inactivity. Over the next decade, a marked increase in the number of adults with diabetes mellitus is expected.

Takeda is developing SYR-322 (alogliptin) for the improvement of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Alogliptin is an inhibitor of the dipeptidyl peptidase IV enzyme. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV is thought to be primarily responsible for the degradation of 2 peptide hormones released in response to nutrient ingestion. It is expected that inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV will improve glycemic (glucose) control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy of alogliptin in combination with pioglitazone in subjects who are inadequately controlled on a thiazolidinedione (pioglitazone or rosiglitazone) alone or in combination with metformin or a sulfonylurea. Individuals who participate in this study will be required to commit to a screening visit and up to 14 additional visits at the study center. Study participation is anticipated to be about 34 weeks (or 8.5 months).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg or 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks

Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin and pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg or 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks

Alogliptin 25 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin and pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg or 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alogliptin and pioglitazone

Alogliptin 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg or 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin and pioglitazone

Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg or 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily and pioglitazone 30 mg or 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SYR110322 Alogliptin AD-4833 Pioglitazone Actos SYR-322 SYR110322 Alogliptin AD-4833 Pioglitazone Actos SYR-322 AD-4833 Actos

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus currently treated with a thiazolidinedione either alone or in combination with metformin or a sulfonylurea but who are experiencing inadequate glycemic control. The subject should have received the thiazolidinedione therapy (rosiglitazone or pioglitazone) either alone or in combination with metformin or a sulfonylurea for at least the 3 months prior to Screening and must have been on a stable dose for all their antidiabetic treatments for at least the month prior to Screening.
* No treatment with antidiabetic agents other than a thiazolidinedione alone or in combination with either metformin or a sulfonylurea within the 3 months prior to Screening. (Exception: if a subject has received other antidiabetic therapy for less than 7 days within the 3 months prior to Screening.)
* Body mass index greater than or equal to 23 kg/m2 and less than or equal to 45 kg/m2
* Fasting C-peptide concentration greater than or equal to 0.8 ng per mL. (If this screening criterion is not met, the subject still qualifies if C-peptide is greater than or equal to 1.5 ng per mL after a challenge test.)
* Glycosylated hemoglobin concentration between 7.0% and 10.0%, inclusive.
* If regular use of other, non-excluded medications, must be on a stable dose for at least the 4 weeks prior to Screening. However, as needed use of prescription or over-the-counter medications is allowed at the discretion of the investigator.
* Systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 180 mm Hg and diastolic pressure less than or equal to 110 mm Hg.
* Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 12 g per dL for males and greater than or equal to10 g per dL for females.
* Alanine aminotransferase less than or equal to 2.5 times the upper limit of normal.
* Serum creatinine less than or equal to 2.0 mg per dL.
* Thyroid-stimulating hormone level less than or equal to the upper limit of the normal range and the subject is clinically euthyroid.
* Neither pregnant nor lactating.
* Female subjects of childbearing potential must be practicing adequate contraception. Adequate contraception must be practiced for the duration of participation in the study.
* Able and willing to monitor their own blood glucose concentrations with a home glucose monitor.
* No major illness or debility that in the investigator's opinion prohibits the subject from completing the study.
* Able and willing to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Urine albumin to creatinine ratio of greater than 1000 μg per mg at Screening. If elevated, the subject may be rescreened within 1 week.
* History of cancer, other than squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, that has not been in full remission for at least 5 years prior to Screening. (A history of treated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia II is allowed.)
* History of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within the 6 months prior to Screening.
* History of treated diabetic gastric paresis.
* New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure regardless of therapy. Currently treated subjects who are stable at Class I or II are candidates for the study.
* History of coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction within the 6 months prior to Screening
* History of any hemoglobinopathy that may affect determination of glycosylated hemoglobin.
* History of infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus.
* History of a psychiatric disorder that will affect the subject's ability to participate in the study.
* History of angioedema in association with use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor inhibitors.
* History of alcohol or substance abuse within the 2 years prior to Screening.
* Receipt of any investigational drug within the 30 days prior to Screening or a history of receipt of an investigational antidiabetic drug within the 3 months prior to Screening.
* Prior treatment in an investigational study of alogliptin.
* Excluded Medications:

* Treatment with antidiabetic agents other than a thiazolidinedione alone or in combination with either metformin or a sulfonylurea is not allowed within the 3 months prior to Screening and through the completion of the end-of-treatment/early termination procedures.
* Treatment with weight-loss drugs, any investigational antidiabetics, or oral or systemically injected glucocorticoids is not allowed from 3 months prior to randomization through the completion of the end-of-treatment/early termination procedures. Inhaled corticosteroids are allowed.

Subjects must not take any medications, including over-the-counter products, without first consulting with the investigator.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

VP Biological Sciences

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Artesia, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Site Status

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Norwalk, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Cocoa Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Longwood, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocoee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Saint Cloud, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Avon, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Elkhart, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Lafayette, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Erlanger, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Sudbury, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Chesterfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Berlin, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Burlington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Morehead City, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Pinehurst, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

West Grove, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Cookeville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Milan, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texarkana, Texas, United States

Site Status

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Argentina

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Australia

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Brazil

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Czechia

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Germany

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Guatemala

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Hungary

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , India

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Mexico

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Netherlands

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , New Zealand

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Peru

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , South Africa

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Brazil Czechia Germany Guatemala Hungary India Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Peru South Africa

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pratley RE, Reusch JE, Fleck PR, Wilson CA, Mekki Q; Alogliptin Study 009 Group. Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin added to pioglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Oct;25(10):2361-71. doi: 10.1185/03007990903156111.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19650752 (View on PubMed)

Pratley RE, McCall T, Fleck PR, Wilson CA, Mekki Q. Alogliptin use in elderly people: a pooled analysis from phase 2 and 3 studies. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Nov;57(11):2011-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02484.x. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19793357 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2005-004669-40

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1113-8552

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SYR-322-TZD-009

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study of Combination Therapy With SYR-322
NCT01521962 COMPLETED PHASE3
Double-blind Comparative Study of SYR-472
NCT01632007 COMPLETED PHASE3