Efficacy and Safety of Alogliptin Plus Metformin Compared to Glipizide Plus Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

NCT ID: NCT00856284

Last Updated: 2013-12-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

2639 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-03-31

Study Completion Date

2012-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of adding alogliptin, once daily (QD), compared to glipizide with metformin in diabetic patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

For patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus, metformin is the usual first-line therapy in addition to diet control and exercise. For those patients with inadequate glycemic control with metformin monotherapy or experiencing serious side effects of metformin, sulfonylurea is a popular choice as a second-line oral antidiabetic treatment.

Alogliptin is a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor currently being developed by Takeda for use in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

This study is designed to further explore the durability of efficacy and safety of alogliptin compared to glipizide in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients whose blood sugar level is inadequately controlled with metformin therapy.

The duration of this study will be approximately 2 years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Diabetes Mellitus Drug Therapy Hyperinsulinism Hyperglycemia Glucose Intolerance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Metformin + Alogliptin 12.5 mg

Alogliptin 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and the maximum tolerated dose of metformin (1500 mg to 3300 mg daily) for up to 104 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin tablets

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin tablets

Metformin + Alogliptin 25 mg

Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and the maximum tolerated dose of metformin (1500 mg to 3300 mg daily) for up to 104 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin tablets

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin tablets

Metformin + Glipizide

Glipizide 5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and the maximum tolerated dose of metformin (1500 mg to 3300 mg daily) for up to 104 weeks. After at least 2 weeks of treatment but prior to Week 20, participants with persistent hyperglycemia (fasting plasma glucose ≥250 mg/dL) underwent a dose titration of glipizide up to 20 mg in 5-mg increments in 4-week intervals.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin tablets

Glipizide

Intervention Type DRUG

Glipizide tablets

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alogliptin

Alogliptin tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin

Metformin tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Glipizide

Glipizide tablets

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SYR-322 Nesina Glucophage Glucotrol

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Has a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
* Must meet one of the following:

* Has been inadequately controlled on a stable daily dose of ≥1500 mg (or documented maximum tolerated dose) of metformin for at least 2 months prior to Screening.
* Has been inadequately controlled (as defined by a glycosylated hemoglobin 7.5 - 10%, inclusive) on metformin \<1500 mg without documented maximum tolerated dose.
* No treatment with antidiabetic agents other than metformin within 2 months prior to Screening (for Schedule A)/Pre-Screening (for Schedule B).
* Has body mass index within 23 kg/m\^2 and 45 kg/m\^2 unless the patient is Asian or of Asian descent, for whom the allowable body mass index will be ≥ 20 kg/m\^2 and ≤ 35 kg/m\^2, inclusive.
* Has fasting C-peptide concentration at least 0.8 ng.
* If regularly using non-excluded medications, must be on a stable dose at least 4 weeks prior to Screening/Pre-screening.
* Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant, lactating or intends to donate ova from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
* Must be able and willing to monitor their blood glucose concentrations with a home monitor, and comply with protocol requirements including scheduled clinic appointments.

Exclusion Criteria

* Systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 150 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure greater than or equal to 90.
* Hemoglobin less than or equal to 12 g/dL for males and less than or equal to 10 g/dL for females at Screening Visit.
* Alanine aminotransferase greater than or equal to 2.5 times the upper limit of normal at Screening Visit.
* Serum creatinine greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL for males and 1.4 for females, or calculated creatinine clearance less than 60 L/min.
* Males intending to impregnate others or donate sperm before, during or within 1 month after participating in the study.
* A history of cancer other than squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has not been in full remission for at least 5 years.
* A history of laser treatment for diabetic retinopathy within 6 months of screening.
* Treated for diabetic gastric paresis, gastric banding, or gastric bypass.
* New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure.
* History of coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, myocardial infarction, stroke or transient ischemic attack within 3 months prior to screening.
* Known history of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B or C.
* Alcohol or substance abuse within 2 years prior to screening.
* Is required to take or intends to continue taking any disallowed medication, any prescription medication, herbal treatment or over-the counter medication that may interfere with evaluation of the study medication, including:

* Any investigational drug within 30 days
* Any investigational diabetic drug within 3 months
* Any antidiabetic drug in the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide-1 mimetics classes within 90 days prior to Screening other than metformin
* Prior treatment with alogliptin.
* Weight-loss drugs
* Oral or systemically injected glucocorticoids
* A hypersensitivity allergy or anaphylactic reaction to any dipeptidyl peptidase-4 drug, metformin or glipizide.
* Has a documented history or concurrent signs of significant thyroid disease (eg, autoimmune thyroid diseases such as Graves disease and Hashimoto thyroiditis or active thyroid nodules).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Director, Clinical Science

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Montgomery, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Pell City, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Sierra Vista, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Artesia, California, United States

Site Status

Chico, California, United States

Site Status

Los Alamitos, California, United States

Site Status

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Site Status

National City, California, United States

Site Status

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Pismo Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Riverside, California, United States

Site Status

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Arvada, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Ridgefield, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Brooksville, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

North Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Opa-locka, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Addison, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Bloomington, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Mishawaka, Indiana, United States

Site Status

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Munfordville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Marrero, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Bangor, Maine, United States

Site Status

Elkridge, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Oxon Hill, Maryland, United States

Site Status

North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Picayune, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

City of Saint Peters, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

New Windsor, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Beachwood, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Willoughby Hills, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Zanesville, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Havertown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Tipton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

New Tazewell, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Carrollton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Hurst, Texas, United States

Site Status

Katy, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Spring, Texas, United States

Site Status

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Midvale, Utah, United States

Site Status

Hampton, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Lewisburg, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Mar del Plata, , Argentina

Site Status

Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Site Status

Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Herston, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Site Status

Brasília - DF, Planalto Central, Brazil

Site Status

Mogi das Cruzes, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Fortaleza, , Brazil

Site Status

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Brampton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Collingwood, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Corunna, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Etobichoke, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Smith Falls, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Smiths Falls, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Granby, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Providencia, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Santiago, Santiago Metropolitan, Chile

Site Status

Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany

Site Status

Kelkheim, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Offenbach, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Neuwied, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Rhaunen, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Guatemala City, Departamento de Guatemala, Guatemala

Site Status

Kowloon, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Site Status

Wong Tai Sin, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Site Status

Pok Fu Lam, Southern District, Hong Kong

Site Status

Pécs, Baranya, Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, Bekes County, Hungary

Site Status

Miskolc, Borsod-Abauj Zemplen county, Hungary

Site Status

Budapest, Budapest, Hungary

Site Status

Kalocsa, Bács-Kiskun county, Hungary

Site Status

Makó, Csongrád megye, Hungary

Site Status

Szentes, Csongrád megye, Hungary

Site Status

Nyíregyháza, Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg, Hungary

Site Status

Zalaegerszeg, Zala County, Hungary

Site Status

Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India

Site Status

Patna, Bihar, India

Site Status

Karnāl, Haryana, India

Site Status

Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Belagavi, Karnataka, India

Site Status

Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India

Site Status

Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Site Status

Trichy, Tamil Nadu, India

Site Status

Kfar Saba, Center District, Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, Central District, Israel

Site Status

Matan, Central District, Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, Central District, Israel

Site Status

Hadera, Haifa District, Israel

Site Status

Haifa, Haifa District, Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel

Site Status

Nahariya, Northern District, Israel

Site Status

Safed, Northern District, Israel

Site Status

Ashkelon, Southern District, Israel

Site Status

Beersheba, Southern District, Israel

Site Status

Holon, Tel Aviv, Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, Israel

Site Status

Safed, , Israel

Site Status

Milan, Milan, Italy

Site Status

Perugia, Perugia, Italy

Site Status

Pistoia, Pistoia, Italy

Site Status

Daugavpils, , Latvia

Site Status

Liepāja, , Latvia

Site Status

Limbaži, , Latvia

Site Status

Ogre, , Latvia

Site Status

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Talsi, , Latvia

Site Status

Tukums, , Latvia

Site Status

Valmiera, , Latvia

Site Status

Alytus, , Lithuania

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Kėdainiai, , Lithuania

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Palanga, , Lithuania

Site Status

Panevezys, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Ipoh, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kajang, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kota Bharu, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuala Terengganu, , Malaysia

Site Status

Kuantan, , Malaysia

Site Status

Malacca, , Malaysia

Site Status

Taiping, , Malaysia

Site Status

Tlalnepantla, Edo de Mexico, Mexico

Site Status

Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico

Site Status

Huixquilucan Edo. de Mexico, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Auckland, , New Zealand

Site Status

Christchurch, , New Zealand

Site Status

Hamilton, , New Zealand

Site Status

Otahuhu, , New Zealand

Site Status

Palmerston North, , New Zealand

Site Status

Takapuna, , New Zealand

Site Status

Tauranga, , New Zealand

Site Status

Wellington, , New Zealand

Site Status

Chiclayo, Lambayeque, Peru

Site Status

Lima, San Juan de Miraflores, Peru

Site Status

Ica, , Peru

Site Status

Manila, , Philippines

Site Status

Bytom, , Poland

Site Status

Gniewkowo, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Radom, , Poland

Site Status

Rzeszów, , Poland

Site Status

Tychy, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Ponce, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Bacau, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Galati, , Romania

Site Status

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Sibiu, , Romania

Site Status

Târgu Mureş, , Romania

Site Status

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Irkutsk, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Samara, , Russia

Site Status

Smolensk, , Russia

Site Status

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Port Elizabeth, Eastern Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Site Status

Tongaat, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Gwangju, Honam, South Korea

Site Status

Daejeon, Hoseo, South Korea

Site Status

Daegu, Yeongnam, South Korea

Site Status

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain

Site Status

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Amphure Muang, , Thailand

Site Status

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Chiang Mai, , Thailand

Site Status

Khon Kaen, , Thailand

Site Status

Dnepropertovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnytsa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhye, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Aintree-Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bath, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Bournemouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Dundee, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Stevenage, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Swansea, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Austria Brazil Canada Chile Germany Guatemala Hong Kong Hungary India Israel Italy Latvia Lithuania Malaysia Mexico New Zealand Peru Philippines Poland Puerto Rico Romania Russia Singapore South Africa South Korea Spain Thailand Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gordon J, McEwan P, Hurst M, Puelles J. The Cost-Effectiveness of Alogliptin Versus Sulfonylurea as Add-on Therapy to Metformin in Patients with Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Ther. 2016 Dec;7(4):825-845. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0206-7. Epub 2016 Oct 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27787778 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2008-007444-34

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1111-7397

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

HKCTR-862

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DOH-27-0709-2825

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

09/H0703/66

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NMRR-09-203-3590

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SYR-322_305

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id