Efficacy and Safety of Alogliptin Plus Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT01023581

Last Updated: 2013-03-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

784 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-11-30

Study Completion Date

2011-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of alogliptin combined with metformin, once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID), in participants with Type 2 Diabetes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There are approximately 19 million people in the United States who have been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, of which 90% to 95% are type 2. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes varies among racial and ethnic populations and has been shown to correlate with age, obesity, family history, history of gestational diabetes and physical inactivity. Over the next decade, a marked increase in the number of adults with diabetes mellitus is expected.

Metformin is the usual choice of first-line therapy for type 2 diabetes. Metformin targets insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes by inhibiting hepatic glucose production and stimulating glucose uptake in skeletal muscle and adipose tissue, which results in a long-term glucose-lowering effect.

Alogliptin is an inhibitor of the dipeptidyl peptidase IV enzyme. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 enzyme is thought to be primarily responsible for the in vivo degradation of 2 peptide hormones released in response to nutrient ingestion, namely glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide. Both peptides exert important effects on islet beta cells to stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion as well as regulating beta cell proliferation and cytoprotection. Glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, inhibits gastric emptying, glucagon secretion, and food intake. Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide has been shown to enhance insulin secretion by direct interaction with a glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide -specific receptor on islet beta cells. The glucose-lowering actions of glucagon-like peptide-1, but not glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, are preserved in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. It is expected that inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV will improve glycemic (glucose) control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Based on the potential, complimentary mechanisms of action of alogliptin and metformin, this study will compare the safety and efficacy of alogliptin and metformin (SYR-322MET) on improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are inadequately controlled by diet adjustment and exercise alone.

Participants taking part in this study will receive dietary and exercise coaching, and will monitor their own blood glucose concentrations with a home glucose monitor. Participants will also be required to maintain a hypoglycemic diary throughout the course of the study. Participation in this study is expected to last up to 34 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, twice daily and Metformin placebo-matching capsules, orally, twice daily for up to 26 weeks.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Alogliptin Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets.

Metformin Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin placebo-matching capsules.

Alogliptin 25 QD

Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily (QD) and Metformin placebo-matching capsules, orally, twice daily for up to 26 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin tablets.

Metformin Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin placebo-matching capsules.

Alogliptin 12.5 BID

Alogliptin 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, twice daily (BID) and Metformin placebo-matching capsules, orally, twice daily for up to 26 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin tablets.

Metformin Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin placebo-matching capsules.

Metformin 500 BID

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, twice daily and Metformin 500 mg capsules, orally, twice daily for up to 26 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin capsules

Alogliptin Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets.

Metformin 1000 BID

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, twice daily and Metformin 1000 mg capsules, orally, twice daily for up to 26 weeks.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin capsules

Alogliptin Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets.

Alogliptin 12.5 BID + Metformin 500 BID

Alogliptin 12.5mg, tablets, orally, twice daily and Metformin 500 mg, capsules, orally, twice daily for up to 26 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin tablets.

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin capsules

Alogliptin 12.5 BID + Metformin 1000 BID

Alogliptin 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, twice daily and Metformin 1000 mg, capsules, orally, twice daily for up to 26 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin tablets.

Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin capsules

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alogliptin

Alogliptin tablets.

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin

Metformin capsules

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin Placebo

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets.

Intervention Type DRUG

Metformin Placebo

Metformin placebo-matching capsules.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SYR-322 Glucophage Glucophage XR Riomet Fortamet Glumetza Obimet Dianben Diabex Diaformin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Has historical diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.
* Has been treated with diet and exercise for at least 2 months prior to Screening, and has a Glycosylated Hemoglobin concentration between 7.5% and 10.0%, inclusive at Screening.
* Has received less than 7 days of any antidiabetic medication within 2 months prior to Screening.
* Body mass index greater than or equal to 23 kg/m\^2 and less than or equal to 45 kg/m\^2 (except for Asian or Asian-descendant subjects for whom the range is between 20 and 35 kg/ m\^2, inclusive).
* Fasting C-peptide concentration greater than or equal to 0.8 ng/mL.
* Regularly using other, non-excluded, medications must be on a stable dose for at least the 4 weeks prior to Screening.
* Females of childbearing potential and males who are sexually active agree to routinely use adequate contraception from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
* Able and willing to monitor their own blood glucose concentrations with a home glucose monitor and complete patient diaries.

Exclusion Criteria

* Hemoglobin less than 12 g/dL for males and less than 10 g/dL for females at Screening Visit.
* Has a history of any hemoglobinopathy that may affect determination of Glycosylated Hemoglobin.
* Has a history of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within the 6 months prior to Screening.
* Has a history of treatment for diabetic gastric paresis, gastric banding, or gastric bypass surgery.
* Has a history of diabetic ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar non-ketotic coma.
* Has systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 150 mmHg and /or diastolic pressure greater than or equal to 90 mmHg at Screening visit.
* Has New York Heart Association Class III to IV heart failure.
* Has a history of coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction within the 90 days prior to Screening.
* Has Alanine aminotransferase greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal at Screening.
* Has a history of alcohol or substance abuse with the 2 years prior to Screening.
* Serum creatinine greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL for males and greater than or equal to 1.4 mg/dL for females.
* Has history of cancer, other than squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin that has not been in full remission for at least 5 years prior to Screening.
* Has a history of infection with human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus.
* Has any major illness or debility that in the investigator's opinion prohibits the subject from completing the study.
* Has received any investigational drug within the 90 days prior to Screening.
* Has a history of hypersensitivity or allergy to alogliptin, other DPP-4 inhibitors, metformin or related compounds.
* Has used oral or systematically injected glucocorticoids or weight loss drugs prior to 2 months to screening.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vice President, Clinical Science

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dothan, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Pell City, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Sierra Vista, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Searcy, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Tempe, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Buena Park, California, United States

Site Status

Cathedral City, California, United States

Site Status

National City, California, United States

Site Status

Pismo Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Roseville, California, United States

Site Status

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Cutler Bay, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Lauderdale Lakes, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Opa-locka, Florida, United States

Site Status

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Panama City, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Blue Ridge, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Lawrenceville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Hayden Lake, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Melrose Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

La Porte, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Mishawaka, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Council Bluffs, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Dubuque, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Marrero, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Oxon Hill, Maryland, United States

Site Status

North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Dearborn, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Picayune, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Brick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Elizabeth, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

North Massapequa, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Mooresville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Gallipolis, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Mason, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Maumee, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bensalem, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Downingtown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Fleetwood, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Perkasie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Shippensburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Tipton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Uniontown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

North Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Taylors, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Brentwood, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Crossville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

McKenzie, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Spring Hill, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Carrollton, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Deer Park, Texas, United States

Site Status

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Hurst, Texas, United States

Site Status

Katy, Texas, United States

Site Status

Odessa, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Schertz, Texas, United States

Site Status

Spring, Texas, United States

Site Status

Sugarland, Texas, United States

Site Status

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Bountiful, Utah, United States

Site Status

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

South Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Petersburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Olomouc, , Czechia

Site Status

Ostrava, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Zlín, , Czechia

Site Status

Znojmo, , Czechia

Site Status

Budaörs, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyöngyös, , Hungary

Site Status

Győr, , Hungary

Site Status

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Komárom, , Hungary

Site Status

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Zalaegerszeg, , Hungary

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Holon, , Israel

Site Status

Kfar Saba, , Israel

Site Status

Nahariya, , Israel

Site Status

Safed, , Israel

Site Status

Kaunas, , Lithuania

Site Status

Kėdainiai, , Lithuania

Site Status

Klaipėda, , Lithuania

Site Status

Vilnius, , Lithuania

Site Status

Acapulco, Guerrero, , Mexico

Site Status

Cuernavaca, , Mexico

Site Status

Culiacan, Sinoloa, , Mexico

Site Status

Distrito Federal, , Mexico

Site Status

Durango, , Mexico

Site Status

Durango, Durango, , Mexico

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, Mexico, , Mexico

Site Status

Monclova, Coahuila, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Monterrey, NL, , Mexico

Site Status

Pachuca, , Mexico

Site Status

Pachuca, Hidalgo, , Mexico

Site Status

Saltillo, , Mexico

Site Status

Tijuana, Baja California, , Mexico

Site Status

Zapopan, Jalisco, , Mexico

Site Status

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Bytom, , Poland

Site Status

Gniewkowo, , Poland

Site Status

Grodzisk Mazowiecki, , Poland

Site Status

Kamieniec Ząbkowicki, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Łęczyca, , Poland

Site Status

Caguas, PR, Puerto Rico

Site Status

Cidra, PR, Puerto Rico

Site Status

Ponce, PR, Puerto Rico

Site Status

Salinas, PR, Puerto Rico

Site Status

San Juan, PR, Puerto Rico

Site Status

Santurce, PR, Puerto Rico

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Trujilo Alto, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Bacau, , Romania

Site Status

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Constanța, , Romania

Site Status

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Ploieşti, , Romania

Site Status

Arkhangelsk, , Russia

Site Status

Irkutsk, , Russia

Site Status

Kemerovo, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Perm, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Ufa, , Russia

Site Status

Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Lučenec, , Slovakia

Site Status

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prievidza, , Slovakia

Site Status

Šahy, , Slovakia

Site Status

Žilina, , Slovakia

Site Status

Centurion, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

Site Status

Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Site Status

Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

Site Status

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Odesa, , Ukraine

Site Status

Vinnytsia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Czechia Hungary Israel Lithuania Mexico Poland Puerto Rico Romania Russia Slovakia South Africa Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pratley RE, Fleck P, Wilson C. Efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy with alogliptin plus metformin versus either as monotherapy in drug-naive patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, 6-month study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2014 Jul;16(7):613-21. doi: 10.1111/dom.12258. Epub 2014 Feb 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 24400655 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2009-012652-24

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1112-1912

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

DOH-27-0910-3155

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CTRI/2010/091/000253

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SYR-322MET_302

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.