Efficacy and Safety of Alogliptin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT00286455

Last Updated: 2012-02-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

329 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2006-02-28

Study Completion Date

2007-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of alogliptin, once daily (QD), in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There are approximately 19 million people in the United States who have been diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, of which 90% to 95% are type 2. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes varies among racial and ethnic populations and has been shown to correlate with age, obesity, family history, history of gestational diabetes, and physical inactivity. Over the next decade, a marked increase in the number of adults with diabetes mellitus is expected.

Takeda is developing SYR-322 (alogliptin) for the improvement of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Alogliptin is an inhibitor of the dipeptidyl peptidase IV enzyme. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV is thought to be primarily responsible for the degradation of 2 peptide hormones released in response to nutrient ingestion. It is expected that inhibition of dipeptidyl peptidase IV will improve glycemic (glucose) control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

The aim of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy of alogliptin in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are inadequately controlled and who have failed treatment with diet and exercise. Individuals who participate in this study will be required to commit to a screening visit and up to 14 additional visits at the study center. Study participation is anticipated to be about 34 weeks (or 8.5 months).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Alogliptin 12.5 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.

Alogliptin 25 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Alogliptin

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.

Placebo QD

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Alogliptin

Alogliptin 12.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Alogliptin

Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Alogliptin placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 26 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SYR110322 SYR-322 SYR110322 SYR-322

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Type 2 diabetes mellitus, experiencing inadequate glycemic control, and are receiving no current antidiabetic therapy. Subjects will qualify if both of the following conditions apply:

* Subject has failed treatment with diet and exercise for at least one month prior to Screening
* Subject has received less than 7 days of any antidiabetic therapy within the 3 months prior to Screening Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes must be based on current American Diabetes Association criteria.
* Body mass index greater than or equal to 23 kg/m2 and less than or equal to 45 kg/m2
* Fasting C-peptide concentration greater than or equal to 0.8 ng per mL (greater than or equal to 0.26 nmol per L). (If this screening criterion is not met, the subject still qualifies if C-peptide greater than or equal to1.5 ng per mL (greater than or equal to 0.50 nmol per L) after a challenge test.
* Glycosylated hemoglobin concentration between 7.0% and 10.0%, inclusive
* If regular use of other, non-excluded medications, must be on a stable dose for at least the 4 weeks prior to Screening. However, as needed use of prescription or over-the-counter medications is allowed at the discretion of the investigator.
* Systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 180 mm Hg and diastolic pressure less than or equal to 110 mm Hg
* Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 12 g per dL (greater than or equal to 120 gm per L) for males and greater than or equal to 10 g per dL (greater than or equal to 100 gm per L) for females
* Alanine aminotransferase less than or equal to 3 times the upper limit of normal
* Serum creatinine less than or equal to 2.0 mg per dL (less than or equal to 17 micromol per L)
* Thyroid-stimulating hormone level less than or equal to the upper limit of the normal range and the subject is clinically euthyroid
* Neither pregnant (confirmed by laboratory testing in females of childbearing potential) nor lactating.
* Female subjects of childbearing potential must be practicing adequate contraception. Adequate contraception must be practiced for the duration of participation in the study.
* Able and willing to monitor their own blood glucose concentrations with a home glucose monitor.
* No major illness or debility that in the investigator's opinion prohibits the subject from completing the study.
* Able and willing to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Urine albumin to creatinine ratio of greater than1000 μg per mg (greater than 113 mg per mol) at Screening. If elevated, the subject may be rescreened within 1 week.
* History of cancer, other than squamous cell or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, that has not been in full remission for at least 5 years prior to Screening. (A history of treated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 is allowed).
* History of laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy within the 6 months prior to Screening.
* History of treated diabetic gastric paresis.
* New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure regardless of therapy. Currently treated subjects who are stable at Class I or II are candidates for the study.
* History of coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement, coronary bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction within the 6 months prior to Screening.
* History of any hemoglobinopathy that may affect determination of glycosylated hemoglobin.
* History of infection with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus.
* History of a psychiatric disorder that will affect the subject's ability to participate in the study.
* History of angioedema in association with use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin-II receptor inhibitors.
* History of alcohol or substance abuse within the 2 years prior to Screening.
* Receipt of any investigational drug within the 30 days prior to Screening or a history of receipt of an investigational antidiabetic drug within the 3 months prior to Screening.
* Prior treatment in an investigational study of alogliptin.
* Excluded Medications

* Treatment with antidiabetic agents (other than study drug following enrollment in the study) is not allowed within the 3 months prior to Screening and through the completion of the end-of-treatment/early termination procedures. (Exception: if a subject has received other antidiabetic therapy for less than 7 days within the 3 months prior to Screening.)
* Treatment with weight-loss drugs, any investigational antidiabetics, or oral or systemically injected glucocorticoids is not allowed from 3 months prior to randomization through the completion of the end-of-treatment/early termination procedures. Inhaled corticosteroids are allowed.
* Subjects are not to take any medications, including over-the-counter products, without first consulting with the Study Doctor.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

VP Biological Sciences

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Peoria, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Anaheim, California, United States

Site Status

Artesia, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Lafayette, California, United States

Site Status

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Colorado Springs, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Cocoa Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Longwood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Ocoee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Saint Cloud, Florida, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Avon, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Elkhart, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Sudbury, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Berlin, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Burlington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Morehead City, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Pinehurst, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Lansdale, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

West Grove, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bristol, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Cookeville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Milan, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Corpus Christi, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Temple, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texarkana, Texas, United States

Site Status

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Argentina

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Australia

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Brazil

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Chile

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Czechia

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Dominican Republic

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Germany

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Guatemala

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Hungary

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , India

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Mexico

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Netherlands

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , New Zealand

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Peru

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , Poland

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , South Africa

Site Status

Multiple Cities, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Brazil Chile Czechia Dominican Republic Germany Guatemala Hungary India Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Peru Poland South Africa United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

DeFronzo RA, Fleck PR, Wilson CA, Mekki Q; Alogliptin Study 010 Group. Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor alogliptin in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Care. 2008 Dec;31(12):2315-7. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1035. Epub 2008 Sep 22.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18809631 (View on PubMed)

Pratley RE, McCall T, Fleck PR, Wilson CA, Mekki Q. Alogliptin use in elderly people: a pooled analysis from phase 2 and 3 studies. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009 Nov;57(11):2011-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02484.x. Epub 2009 Sep 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19793357 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2005-004670-24

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1113-8462

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

SYR-322-PLC-010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study of Combination Therapy With SYR-322
NCT01521962 COMPLETED PHASE3
Double-blind Comparative Study of SYR-472
NCT01632007 COMPLETED PHASE3