Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone and Azilsartan in Treating Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

NCT ID: NCT00762736

Last Updated: 2012-02-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

704 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-07-31

Study Completion Date

2005-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of pioglitazone, once daily (QD), combined with azilsartan in the treatment of subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diabetes is a chronic disease with multiple metabolic defects that result in hyperglycemia arising from inadequate insulin activity. Type 2 diabetes has a genetic predisposition, but lifestyle, body constitution and age play important roles in determining its time of onset and severity. Type 2 diabetes is usually the result of a progression from reduced sensitivity of hepatic and peripheral-tissue cells to circulating insulin (i.e., insulin resistance) to a progressive inability of the body to produce adequate insulin to overcome insulin resistance (i.e., insulin deficiency due to beta cell insufficiency) resulting in impaired glucose tolerance and ultimately overt diabetes. In the United States, an estimated 15.7 million people have diabetes, with type 2 diabetes occurring in approximately 90-95% of cases.

Therapeutic agents have been developed to address each of the major functional metabolic defects associated with type 2 diabetes: decreased beta-cell function, elevated hepatic glucose output, and insulin resistance. The oral therapeutic agents used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes can be separated into the following four categories based on their mechanisms of action: insulin secretagogues, inhibitors of hepatic glucose output, inhibitors of complex carbohydrate breakdown in the intestine and insulin sensitizers.

Thiazolidinediones reduce insulin resistance by enhancing insulin sensitivity in muscle cells, adipose tissue, and hepatic cells (inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis) with no direct impact on insulin secretion. Thus thiazolidinediones improve glycemic control and result in reduced levels of circulating insulin. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are found in tissues important for insulin action, such as adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and the liver. The greatest concentration of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors -gamma receptors is in adipose tissue. Pioglitazone HCl (ACTOS®) is a thiazolidinedione developed by Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd.

Research suggests that Angiotensin II receptor blockers are involved in endothelial and cardiovascular function, and in insulin sensitization and obesity. TAK-536 (azilsartan) is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist with affinity for and selective antagonistic activity at the angiotensin II type 1 receptor.

This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of pioglitazone in combination with azilsartan in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Study participation is anticipated to be approximately 6 months.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pioglitazone 15 mg QD + Azilsartan 5 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pioglitazone and azilsartan

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone 15 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan 5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Pioglitazone 15 mg QD + Azilsartan 40 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pioglitazone and azilsartan

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone 15 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Pioglitazone 15 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone 15 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Pioglitazone 45 mg QD + Azilsartan 5 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pioglitazone and azilsartan

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan 5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Pioglitazone 45 mg QD + Azilsartan 40 mg QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pioglitazone and azilsartan

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Pioglitazone 45 mg QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pioglitazone and azilsartan

Pioglitazone 15 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan 5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone and azilsartan

Pioglitazone 15 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone

Pioglitazone 15 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone and azilsartan

Pioglitazone 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan 5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone and azilsartan

Pioglitazone 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone

Pioglitazone 45 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and azilsartan placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for up to 24 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ACTOS® AD4833 TAK-536 ACTOS® AD4833 TAK-536 ACTOS® AD4833 ACTOS® AD4833 TAK-536 ACTOS® AD4833 TAK-536 ACTOS® AD4833

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Had type 2 diabetes, with a hemoglobin value of greater than or equal to 8.0% or less than 10.0% at Screening.
* Females of childbearing potential who were sexually active agreed to use adequate contraception, and were neither pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
* Received antihypertensive therapy and must have been on a stable dose for a minimum of 8 weeks prior to Screening.
* Had clinical laboratory evaluations (including clinical chemistry, hematology, and complete urinalysis) within the reference range for the testing laboratory unless the results were deemed not clinically significant for inclusion into this study by the investigator or sponsor.
* Had been on stable diet and exercise program and oral anti-glycemic therapy including sulfonylurea or metformin for 8 weeks prior to Screening.

Exclusion Criteria

* Had a hemoglobin value less than 8.0% or greater than 10.0% at Screening.
* Was taking an angiotensin II receptor blocker.
* Had uncontrolled hypertension defined as systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure greater than 100 mm Hg. - Had a systolic blood pressure less than or equal to 110 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure less than or equal to 60 mm Hg.
* Was taking or was expected to take the following medications:

* antidiabetic agents (other than sulfonylurea or metformin)
* tricyclic antidepressants
* monoamine oxidase inhibitors
* phenothiazines
* diet medications
* amphetamines or their derivatives
* lithium
* common cold medications with chronic use
* nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with chronic use (including aspirin greater than 325 mg/day or cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors).
* Had unstable angina or heart failure of any etiology with functional class New York Heart Association III or IV.
* Had a history of myocardial infarction.
* Had clinically significant cardiac conduction defects (eg, second or third degree atrioventricular block, left bundle branch block, sick sinus syndrome, atrial fibrillation or flutter).
* Had secondary hypertension of any etiology (eg, renovascular disease, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome).
* Had a history of collagen vascular disorder (eg, systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma) within the last 5 years.
* Had a body mass index greater than 39 kg/m2.
* Had significant, moderate-to-severe renal dysfunction (creatinine greater than 2.4 mg/dL). If receiving metformin, a creatinine greater than 1.5 mg/dL for male subjects or greater than 1.4 mg/dL for female subjects led to exclusion.
* Had a history of drug abuse or a history of alcohol abuse within the past 2 years.
* Had a previous history of cancer, other than basal cell carcinoma, that had not been in remission for at least 5 years prior to the first dose of study drug.
* Had type 2 diabetes with clinically important retinopathy or peripheral or autonomic neuropathy.
* Had an alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase level of greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal, active liver disease, or jaundice.
* Was participating in another investigational study or had participated in an investigational study within 30 days prior to randomization.
* Had any other serious disease or condition at Screening (or randomization) that might have compromised subject safety, affected life expectancy, or made it difficult to successfully manage and follow the subject according to the protocol.
* Was hypersensitive to angiotensin II receptor blockers.
* Was hypersensitive to thiazolidinediones.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

VP Clinical Science Strategy

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Sierra Vista, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Sun City, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Burbank, California, United States

Site Status

Escondido, California, United States

Site Status

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

National City, California, United States

Site Status

Riverside, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Spring Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

New Port Richey, Florida, United States

Site Status

Opa-locka, Florida, United States

Site Status

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Sarasota, Florida, United States

Site Status

Vero Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Warner Robins, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Honolulu, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Lihue, Hawaii, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Dyersburg, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Salisbury, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Cadillac, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Livonia, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

North Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Berlin, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Blackwood, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Trenton, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Kingston, New York, United States

Site Status

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Marion, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Clinton, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Scotland, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Woonsocket, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Midland, Texas, United States

Site Status

North Richard Hills, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Renton, Washington, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Rosario-Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Santa Fe, , Argentina

Site Status

Ushuaia - Tierre Del Fuego, , Argentina

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Aguascalientes, , Mexico

Site Status

Cuernavaca, , Mexico

Site Status

Durango, , Mexico

Site Status

Guadalajara, , Mexico

Site Status

Mexico City, , Mexico

Site Status

Puebla City, , Mexico

Site Status

Ica, , Peru

Site Status

Lima, , Peru

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Chile Mexico Peru

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1115-8992

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

01-04-TL-OPI-525

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.