Study to Compare Pioglitazone and Rosiglitazone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Dyslipidemia
NCT ID: NCT00331487
Last Updated: 2012-02-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
719 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2000-09-30
2004-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Pioglitazone-Azilsartan in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00376181
Pioglitazone Study of Triglyceride Changes in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes After Conversion From Rosiglitazone.
NCT00672919
The Effect of Pioglitazone and Rosiglitazone on Atherosclerotic and Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Metabolic Syndrome
NCT00314561
Efficacy of Alogliptin and With Pioglitazone in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.
NCT00655863
Rosiglitazone In Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Are Inadequately Controlled On Insulin
NCT00329225
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The dyslipidemia associated with insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes mellitus is characterized by elevated triglyceride levels and decreased high-density lipoprotein (good) cholesterol levels. Although low-density lipoprotein (bad) cholesterol levels may not be significantly elevated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, an increase in the proportion of small, dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol particles of increased atherogenicity (increased formation of lipid deposits in the arteries) is observed. When compared with individuals without type 2 diabetes mellitus, the risk of cardiovascular disease is 2- to 4-fold greater in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and the dyslipidemia of diabetes is an important contributor to the increased risk in this population.
By targeting the insulin resistance underlying type 2 diabetes mellitus, the thiazolidinedione class of oral antihyperglycemic medications possesses both a glucose-lowering effect and the potential to alter lipid/lipoprotein metabolism. Two thiazolidinediones are currently available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: pioglitazone hydrochloride (ACTOS, Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc, Lincolnshire, IL) and rosiglitazone maleate (Avandia, GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC).
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the triglyceride-lowering effects of pioglitazone to rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and dyslipidemia who are not receiving any other glucose- or lipid-lowering therapies at the same time as the study medications.
Individuals who participate in this study will provide written informed consent and will be required to commit to a screening visit and approximately 7 additional visits at the study center. Study participation is anticipated to be about 39 weeks (or approximately 8 months). Multiple procedures will occur at each visit which may include fasting, blood collection, physical examinations and electrocardiograms. Participants will be required to follow a diabetic diet, self-monitor their blood glucose and maintain a study diary for the duration of the study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pioglitazone QD
Pioglitazone
Pioglitazone 30 mg capsules, orally, once daily and placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 12 weeks; increasing to pioglitazone 45 mg, capsules, orally, once daily and placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 12 weeks
Rosiglitazone QD
Rosiglitazone
Rosiglitazone 4 mg capsules, orally, once daily and placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 12 weeks; increasing to rosiglitazone 4 mg, capsules, orally, twice daily for up to 12 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pioglitazone
Pioglitazone 30 mg capsules, orally, once daily and placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 12 weeks; increasing to pioglitazone 45 mg, capsules, orally, once daily and placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 12 weeks
Rosiglitazone
Rosiglitazone 4 mg capsules, orally, once daily and placebo-matching capsules, orally, once daily for up to 12 weeks; increasing to rosiglitazone 4 mg, capsules, orally, twice daily for up to 12 weeks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Fasting serum C-peptide greater than or equal to1 ng per
* Glycosylated hemoglobin greater than or equal to 7% and less than or equal to 11% if naive to oral antihyperglycemic medications, or greater than or equal to 9.5% if previously treated with oral antihyperglycemic monotherapy
Exclusion Criteria
* Treatment with a drug within 30 days of Visit 1 that had not received regulatory approval.
* Treatment within 60 days of Visit 1 with any of the following:
* insulin
* systemic glucocorticoid therapy (excluding topical and inhaled preparations)
* combination glycemic therapy (two or more oral anti-diabetes medications)
* any lipid-lowering agent (including nicotinic acid, fibrates, bile acid resin binders, statins, d thyroxine or neomycin)
* any weight loss agent (prescription or over the counter)
* Pregnant, breast feeding, or intending to become pregnant during the study.
* Serum creatinine greater than or equal to 176.8 μmol per L or greater than or equal to 2 plus per dipstick.
* Proteinuria at Visit 1.
* Alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase greater than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limit of normal at Visit 1 or had significant clinical signs or symptoms of liver disease.
* History of signs or symptoms of liver disease, such as jaundice or alanine transaminase greater than or equal to 1.5 times the upper limit of normal, while treated with any thiazolidinedione
* Hemoglobin less than 10.5 g per dL for females and less than11.5 g per dL for males at Visit 1.
* Clinically or biochemically based on thyroid stimulating hormone at Visit 1 hypothyroid or hyperthyroid.
* History of myocardial infarction, acute cardiovascular event, or heart surgery within 6 months of Visit 1.
* Functional New York Heart Association Cardiac Class III or IV disease.
* Receiving renal dialysis or has had received a renal transplant.
* Undergoing therapy for a malignancy other than basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer.
* Clinical signs or symptoms of drug or alcohol abuse.
* History of HIV infection.
* Allergy to any glitazone drug.
* Medical history or the presence of any clinically significant or unstable medical condition that made the patient unlikely to complete the study.
* Any condition or situations that precluded adherence and completion of the protocol or a precluding ability to voluntarily give informed consent.
35 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Eli Lilly and Company
INDUSTRY
Takeda
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Alfonso Perez, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Takeda
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Anniston, Alabama, United States
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Concord, California, United States
Fremont, California, United States
Los Angeles, California, United States
Palos Verdes Estates, California, United States
San Diego, California, United States
Santa Barbara, California, United States
Santa Rosa, California, United States
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Englewood, Colorado, United States
Avon, Connecticut, United States
Hamden, Connecticut, United States
Longwood, Florida, United States
Miami, Florida, United States
Miami, Florida, United States
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Fayetteville, Georgia, United States
Honolulu, Hawaii, United States
Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
South Bend, Indiana, United States
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Frederick, Maryland, United States
Salisbury, Massachusetts, United States
South Yarmouth, Massachusetts, United States
Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Chesterfield, Missouri, United States
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
East Setauket, New York, United States
Endwell, New York, United States
New York, New York, United States
Rochester, New York, United States
Staten Island, New York, United States
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
Morehead City, North Carolina, United States
Wilmington, North Carolina, United States
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Franklin, Ohio, United States
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Portland, Oregon, United States
Salem, Oregon, United States
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Pottstown, Pennsylvania, United States
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
Knoxville, Tennessee, United States
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Beaumont, Texas, United States
Conroe, Texas, United States
Dallas, Texas, United States
Houston, Texas, United States
Lake Jackson, Texas, United States
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Ogden, Utah, United States
Mechanicsville, Virginia, United States
Newport News, Virginia, United States
Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States
Federal Way, Washington, United States
Wenatchee, Washington, United States
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Goldberg RB, Kendall DM, Deeg MA, Buse JB, Zagar AJ, Pinaire JA, Tan MH, Khan MA, Perez AT, Jacober SJ; GLAI Study Investigators. A comparison of lipid and glycemic effects of pioglitazone and rosiglitazone in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care. 2005 Jul;28(7):1547-54. doi: 10.2337/diacare.28.7.1547.
Tilden DP, Mariz S, O'Bryan-Tear G, Bottomley J, Diamantopoulos A. A lifetime modelled economic evaluation comparing pioglitazone and rosiglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UK. Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(1):39-54. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725010-00005.
Deeg MA, Buse JB, Goldberg RB, Kendall DM, Zagar AJ, Jacober SJ, Khan MA, Perez AT, Tan MH; GLAI Study Investigators. Pioglitazone and rosiglitazone have different effects on serum lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes in patients with type 2 diabetes and dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care. 2007 Oct;30(10):2458-64. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1903. Epub 2007 Jun 26.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
U1111-1115-9039
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
H6E-US-GLAI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.