Efficacy of Pioglitazone/Metformin Combination Therapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Dyslipidemia.

NCT ID: NCT00770653

Last Updated: 2010-10-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

305 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2007-04-30

Study Completion Date

2009-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare pioglitazone and metformin combination therapy, twice daily (BID), to glimepiride and metformin combination therapy for treating diabetic subjects with dyslipidemia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Insulin resistance is a major endocrinopathy preceding the development of hyperglycemia, diabetic dyslipidemia and cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes. The most common pattern of dyslipidemia in patients with type 2 diabetes are elevated triglyceride levels, decreased hih-density lipoprotein cholesterol and a predominance of small dense low-density lipoprotein particles. Each of these dyslipidemia features is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events.

Pioglitazone and Metformin are established drugs which can be used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. This study will investigate the effects of treatment with fixed Pioglitazone/Metformin combination therapy of Metformin and Glimepiride in Metformin-pretreated type 2 diabetic patients with dyslipidemia.

Total participation time in this study is anticipated to be approximately 24 weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus Dyslipidemias

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pioglitazone 15 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pioglitazone and Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone 15 mg/metformin 850 mg combination tablets, orally, twice daily and glimepiride placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily and metformin placebo-matching tablets, orally, twice daily for up to 24 weeks.

Glimepiride 2 mg and Metformin 850 mg BID

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Glimepiride and Metformin

Intervention Type DRUG

Pioglitazone/metformin placebo-matching combination tablets, orally, twice daily and glimepiride 2 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and metformin 850 mg, tablets, orally, twice daily for up to 24 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pioglitazone and Metformin

Pioglitazone 15 mg/metformin 850 mg combination tablets, orally, twice daily and glimepiride placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily and metformin placebo-matching tablets, orally, twice daily for up to 24 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Glimepiride and Metformin

Pioglitazone/metformin placebo-matching combination tablets, orally, twice daily and glimepiride 2 mg, tablets, orally, once daily and metformin 850 mg, tablets, orally, twice daily for up to 24 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ACTOS® AD-4833 OPIMET Amaryl Glista

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Type 2 diabetes according to the American Diabetes Association Criteria.
* Treatment with individual maximal tolerated dose of metformin (850 - 2000 mg) as monotherapy within the last 12 weeks.
* Glycosylated Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 6.5% and less than or equal to 9%.
* Dyslipidemia defined as high-density lipoprotein cholesterol less than or equal to 1.03 mmol/l (40 mg/dL) and/or triglycerides greater than or equal to 1.7 mmol/l (150 mg/dL).
* Females of childbearing potential who are sexually active must agree to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Type 1 diabetes mellitus.
* Insulin-dependent type 2 diabetes mellitus.
* Treatment or history of treatment with any insulin formulation other than emergency for more than 2 weeks.
* Treatment with other oral antidiabetic drugs in addition to metformin within the last 12 weeks.
* Anamnestic history of hypersensitivity to the study drugs or to drugs with similar chemical structures.
* Is required to take or intends to continue taking any disallowed medication, any prescription medication, herbal treatment or over-the counter medication that may interfere with evaluation of the study medication, including:

* Heparin (and heparin-like drugs)
* coumarin
* phenprocoumon
* hirudin
* Protein C
* Fondaparinux
* antithrombin III
* Peroxisome Proliferation Activating Receptor (gamma) agonists
* Treatment within the last 12 weeks with:

* fibrates
* gemfibrozil
* niacin
* months
* Rifampicin
* Changes in dosage of any statin treatment to lower low-density lipoprotein within 2 weeks before study entry and during study participation interval.
* Changes in dosage of any anticoagulant treatment with acetyl salicylic acid and/or clopidogrel within 2 weeks before study entry and during study participation interval.
* Start of statin and/or anticoagulant treatment during study participation interval.
* History of severe or multiple allergies and/ or acute severe infections.
* Have had more than one unexplained episode of severe hypoglycemia (defined as requiring assistance of another person due to disabling hypoglycemia) within 6 months prior to screening visit.
* Progressive fatal disease.
* Any elective surgery during study participation.
* History of drug or alcohol abuse within the last 5 years.
* A history of significant cardiovascular (New York Heart Association stage I - IV), respiratory, gastrointestinal, hepatic (alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of the normal reference range), renal (serum creatinine greater than 1.2 mg/dL in women and greater than 1.5 mg/dL in men, glomerular filtration rate less than 60 ml/min as estimated by the Cockroft-Gault formula), neurological, psychiatric and/or hematological disease as judged by the investigator, history of macular edema.
* Blood donation within the last 30 days.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Takeda Pharma GmbH, Aachen (Germany)

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Adviser Clinical Research

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda Pharma Gmbh, Aachen (Germany)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bretten, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Deggingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Dettenheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Künzelsau, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Rottweil, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Spaichingen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Stockach, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Wangen, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany

Site Status

Augsburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Feldafing, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Furth im Wald, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Immenstadt im Allgäu, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Lichtenfels, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

München, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Schweinfurt, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Waldkraiburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Wallerfing, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Weilersbach, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Ketzin, Brandenburg, Germany

Site Status

Rüdersdorf, Brandenburg, Germany

Site Status

Bermerhaven, City state Bremen, Germany

Site Status

Hamburg, City state of Hamburg, Germany

Site Status

Bensheim, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Ehrenberg, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Gersfeld, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Kassel, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Kelkheim, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Offenbach, Hesse, Germany

Site Status

Celle, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Einbeck, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Hildesheim, Lower Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany

Site Status

Bad Berleburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Bad Laasphe, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Bad Oeynhausen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Bocholt, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Dinslaken, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Dorsten, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Duisburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Frechen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Isselburg, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Kamen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Marl, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Menden, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Siegen, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

Site Status

Diez, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Neuwied, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Rodenbach, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Simmern, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany

Site Status

Borna, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Dresden, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Meissen, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Mittweida, Saxony, Germany

Site Status

Magdeburg, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany

Site Status

Reinfeld, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany

Site Status

Berlin, State of Berlin, Germany

Site Status

Altenburg, Thuringia, Germany

Site Status

Blankenhain, Thuringia, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pfutzner A, Schondorf T, Tschope D, Lobmann R, Merke J, Muller J, Lehmann U, Fuchs W, Forst T. PIOfix-study: effects of pioglitazone/metformin fixed combination in comparison with a combination of metformin with glimepiride on diabetic dyslipidemia. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 Jun;13(6):637-43. doi: 10.1089/dia.2010.0233. Epub 2011 Apr 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 21457065 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2006-004455-37

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

D-PIO-114

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1114-1678

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ATS K024

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id