Efficacy Study of Pioglitazone Compared to Glimepiride on Coronary Atherosclerotic Disease Progression in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

NCT ID: NCT00225277

Last Updated: 2012-02-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

547 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2003-07-31

Study Completion Date

2007-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of pioglitazone, once daily (QD), compared to glimepiride on atherosclerotic disease measured by intravascular ultrasound.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diabetes is a chronic disease with multiple metabolic defects that result in hyperglycemia arising from inadequate insulin activity. Type 2 diabetes is usually the result of a progression from reduced sensitivity of hepatic and peripheral tissue cells to circulating insulin (ie, insulin resistance) to a progressive inability of the body to produce adequate insulin to overcome insulin resistance (ie, insulin deficiency due to beta-cell insufficiency) resulting in impaired glucose tolerance and ultimately overt diabetes. In the United States, an estimated 21 million people have diabetes, with type 2 diabetes occurring in approximately 90% to 95% of cases. The goal of treating type 2 diabetes is to control blood glucose and thereby prevent long-term complications. Adequate glycemic control is paramount in attempting to avert chronic complications, including blindness; renal dysfunction resulting in dialysis or renal transplantation; neuropathy; non-traumatic amputations; and macrovascular complications, including myocardial ischemia and myocardial infarction, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease. Intensive glucose management in the early stages of diabetes may help forestall such complications.

Therapeutic agents have been developed to address each of the major functional metabolic defects associated with type 2 diabetes: decreased beta-cell function, elevated hepatic glucose output, and insulin resistance. Thiazolidinediones increase glucose utilization, decrease gluconeogenesis, and increase glucose disposal by binding to nuclear receptors known as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors. Thiazolidinediones reduce insulin resistance by enhancing insulin sensitivity in muscle cells, adipose tissue, and hepatic cells (inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis), with no direct impact on insulin secretion. Thus, thiazolidinediones improve glycemic control and result in reduced levels of circulating insulin without predisposing patients to hypoglycemia. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors are found in tissues important for insulin action, such as adipose tissue, skeletal muscle, and the liver. The greatest concentration of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors-gamma receptors is in adipose tissue.

This study was designed to compare the effects of pioglitazone compared to glimepiride on progression of atherosclerotic disease, as measured by intravascular ultrasound.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pioglitazone QD

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pioglitazone

Intervention Type DRUG

Up to 45 mg pioglitazone (optimized for glucose control), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 72 weeks.

Glimepiride QD

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Glimepiride

Intervention Type DRUG

Up to 4 mg of glimepiride (optimized for glucose control), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 72 weeks.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pioglitazone

Up to 45 mg pioglitazone (optimized for glucose control), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 72 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Glimepiride

Up to 4 mg of glimepiride (optimized for glucose control), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 72 weeks.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ACTOS® AD4833

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Females of childbearing potential who were sexually active agreed to use adequate contraception, and can neither be pregnant nor lactating from Screening throughout the duration of the study.
* Had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus
* Have received appropriate counseling on lifestyle modification for type 2 diabetes, including diet and exercise.
* naïve to or was not currently taking antidiabetic therapy, or were currently treated with monotherapy or combination therapy.
* Had a glycosylated hemoglobin level greater than or equal to 6.0% and less than 9% at screening if taking antidiabetic medication or greater than or equal to 6.5% and less than 10% at screening if naive to or not taking antidiabetic medication.
* Angiographic criteria:

* Entire Coronary Circulation: must have angiographic evidence of coronary heart disease as defined by at least 1 lesion in a native coronary artery that has greater than or equal to 20% reduction in lumen diameter by angiographic visual estimation.
* Left Main Coronary Artery: must not have greater than 50% reduction in lumen diameter by visual angiographic estimation.
* Target Coronary Artery:

* The target vessel, which includes the main artery and all of its side branches, had not undergone prior percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
* The target vessel, which includes the main artery and all of its side branches, was not currently a candidate for intervention or a likely candidate for intervention over the next 72 weeks.
* The target vessel was not a bypass graft.
* The target vessel was not infarct related.
* Had previous coronary artery bypass surgery at least six weeks prior to the qualifying intravascular ultrasound are eligible provided they are stable and meet all other entry criteria.
* Had an intravascular ultrasound tape deemed to be of acceptable intravascular ultrasound image quality and demonstrated adherence to the intravascular ultrasound interrogation protocol, as determined by the intravascular ultrasound Core Laboratory™ assessment.

Exclusion Criteria

* Had type I diabetes mellitus.
* Had participated in another investigational study, or participated in an investigational study 30 days prior to the start of this study, or who were scheduled to participate in an investigational study during the time frame of this study.
* Male subjects who had a serum creatinine level greater than or equal to 2.0 mg/dL (greater than or equal to 177 µmol/L) (greater than or equal to 1.5 mg/dL; \[greater than or equal to 133 µmol /L\] if taking metformin) and female subjects who have serum creatinine greater than or equal to 1.8 mg/dL \[greater than or equal to 159 µmol /L\] (greater than or equal to 1.4 mg/dL \[greater than or equal to 124 µmol /L\] if taking metformin).
* Had unexplained microscopic hematuria greater than +1, confirmed by repeat testing.
* Had a history of drug abuse or a history of alcohol abuse (defined as regular or daily consumption of more than 4 alcoholic drinks per day) within the past 2 years.
* Had clinical cardiac failure as defined by New York Heart Association class III or IV, or known left ventricular dysfunction measured as left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%, or by current use of diuretics or angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors for treatment of heart failure.
* Had an alanine transaminase level of greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal active liver disease, or jaundice.
* Had a body mass index greater than 48 kg/m2 as calculated by weight (kg)/height (m2) or weight (pounds)/height (inches) 2 x 703.
* Was required to take or intended to continue taking any disallowed medication, any prescription medication, herbal treatment or over-the counter medication that may have interfered with evaluation of the study medication, including:

* Chronically used oral glucocorticoids (eg, prednisone, cortisone, hydrocortisone, dexamethasone)
* Niacin greater than100 mg a day, including niacin-containing products such as Advicor®
* Chronically used steroid-joint injections
* Thiazolidinediones
* Sulfonylureas
* Metformin/sulfonylurea combination
* Other oral antidiabetic medications (eg, nateglinide \[Starlix®\], acarbose \[Precose®\]) with the exception of metformin
* Had known or suspected malignancy or recurrence of malignancy within the past 5 years, with the exception of basal cell carcinoma and Stage 1 squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
* Had any disease where, in the opinion of the investigator (or designee), survival is expected to be less than 72 weeks.
* Clinical status was unstable (ie, requiring vasopressors or intravenous inotropes, intra-aortic balloon pump, hypotension \[systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg\]).
* Prior to the screening visit, was scheduled for a staged cardiac intervention (percutaneous coronary intervention), peripheral vascular intervention, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery following the screening angiography.
* In the opinion of the investigator (or designee) had clinically significant valvular heart disease likely to require surgical repair/replacement during the course of the study.
* Had persistent, uncontrolled hypertension (ie, sitting systolic blood pressure greater than 160 mm Hg or sitting diastolic blood pressure greater than 100 mm Hg) at randomization.
* Males who had hemoglobin less than 10.5 g/dL (less than 105 g/L) and female subjects who had hemoglobin less than 10.0 g/dL (less than 100 g/L).
* Had a triglyceride level greater than 500 mg/dL (greater than 5.6 mmol/L).
Minimum Eligible Age

35 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Takeda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

VP Clinical Science

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Takeda

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Huntington Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Bridgeport, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Bay Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Edgewood, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Bangor, Maine, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Flint, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Petoskey, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Pontiac, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Ypsilanti, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Duluth, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Saint Cloud, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Columbia, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Camden, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Mineola, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Troy, New York, United States

Site Status

West Islip, New York, United States

Site Status

Williamsville, New York, United States

Site Status

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Westlake, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Abington, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Hershey, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Providence, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Oak Ridge, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lubbock, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Charlottesville, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Everett, Washington, United States

Site Status

Green Bay, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Ciudad de Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

Quilmes, , Argentina

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Winnepeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Sainte-Foy, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Santiago, , Chile

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Canada Chile

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nissen SE, Nicholls SJ, Wolski K, Nesto R, Kupfer S, Perez A, Jure H, De Larochelliere R, Staniloae CS, Mavromatis K, Saw J, Hu B, Lincoff AM, Tuzcu EM; PERISCOPE Investigators. Comparison of pioglitazone vs glimepiride on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: the PERISCOPE randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Apr 2;299(13):1561-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.13.1561. Epub 2008 Mar 31.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 18378631 (View on PubMed)

Betteridge DJ. CHICAGO, PERISCOPE and PROactive: CV risk modification in diabetes with pioglitazone. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2009 Dec;23(6):675-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-8206.2009.00741.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19744248 (View on PubMed)

Nicholls SJ, Tuzcu EM, Wolski K, Bayturan O, Lavoie A, Uno K, Kupfer S, Perez A, Nesto R, Nissen SE. Lowering the triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio is associated with the beneficial impact of pioglitazone on progression of coronary atherosclerosis in diabetic patients: insights from the PERISCOPE (Pioglitazone Effect on Regression of Intravascular Sonographic Coronary Obstruction Prospective Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jan 11;57(2):153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.06.055.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21211686 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

U1111-1114-0400

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

01-01-TL-OPI-516

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.