Comparison of Pioglitazone Versus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Metformin Plus Alogliptin
NCT ID: NCT02426294
Last Updated: 2015-04-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
154 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-02-28
2016-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Pioglitazone in Participants With Inadequately Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Stable Triple Oral Therapy
NCT01972724
Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone Combination Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes Patients on a Background of Empagliflozin With Metformin
NCT06571591
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone 15mg or 30mg Add-on in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Metformin and Dapagliflozin
NCT04885712
Efficacy Study of Pioglitazone Compared to Glimepiride on Coronary Atherosclerotic Disease Progression in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT00225277
Safety and Efficacy of Nateglinide in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Already Taking Insulin Glargine, Metformin and/or Pioglitazone or Rosiglitazone
NCT00402909
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Diabetic complications are very common; the patients of end-stage renal failure with diabetes were 56.7% and patients who begin renal replacement therapy with diabetes were 70.5% in 2003. The prevalence rate of eye problems including cataract, retinopathies and glaucoma in diabetic patients is 1.9 times higher than that in non-diabetic patients. In addition, it is estimated that the incidence rate of acute stroke, which is a complication of the great vessels of diabetic patients, is also 5.2 times higher than that of the general population. As diabetes could cause various complications and be dangerous, the regulation of blood glucose level is essential in order to prevent these complications.
According to the Korea National Health \& Nutrition Examination Survey in 2008\~2010, the rate of patients with well-controlled glycated hemoglobin of below 6.5% among diabetic patients over 30 years old is only 25%. Thus, many studies are being conducted to lower the glycated hemoglobin by administering various line drugs, alone or in combination, because the regulation of blood glucose is difficult for many diabetic patients.
When the regulation of blood glucose ends in failure with a single dose of a drug, the combination treatment is recommended. Metformin is mainly used as the first-order treatment drug, and the second and third drugs, such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor and sulphonylurea, are recommended to use if the first one is not sufficient.
DPP-4 inhibitor is a new line of hypoglycemic agent based on incretin. It has statistically significant results for the regulation of glycated hemoglobin compared to existing oral hypoglycemic agents.
Therefore, many clinicians use Metformin as the first-order drug, and DPP-4 inhibitor as the second-order drug. Alogliptin, which was recently proved to have no side effects of the cardiovascular system, is effective in the regulation of blood glucose as well as the weight control and the prevention of hypoglycemia. Moreover, it is effective when administered alone, and also effective when coadministered with Metformin, Glibenclamide and Pioglitazone. In particular, the reduction degree of glycated hemoglobin was significantly larger when it was administered with Pioglitazone.
Sulphonylurea, the most well-known hypoglycemic agent, is helpful in the regulation of blood glucose and reduces the occurrence frequency of hypoglycemia when combined with Metformin.
2. Rationale This study examines the related factors of the Pioglitazone group, which is a TZDs line, and the Glimepiride group, which is a sulphonylurea line, as the third-order drugs for patients who are coadministered Metformin and Alogliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor.
3. Hypothesis When the SU and TZDs drugs administered as third-order drugs in the patients who administered second-order drugs, the treatment effect is different between the two drugs
4. Primary Aim/Objective:
The primary objective is to compare the mean changes of HbA1c at week 26 between the two groups, SU (glimepiride) administration and TZDs (Pioglitazone) administration, as the third-order drug among patients whose treatment is not sufficient after the combined administration of Metformin and Alogliptin.
5. Primary Endpoint(s):
The mean changes of HbA1c at week 26 from baseline
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pioglitazone
Pioglitazone is a Pioglitazone hydrochloride, and white circle-shaped tablet. It is administered once-daily with 15mg, with or without meals. The once-daily administration begins with 15mg, and if need increase, researchers can increase up to 30mg at week 12.
Pioglitazone
Glimepiride
The generic name of Glimepiride is Glimepiride, and it is a green snowman-shaped tablet. The once-daily administration begins with 2mg, and if need increase, researchers can increase up to 4mg at week 12.
Glimepiride
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pioglitazone
Glimepiride
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients had to have a body weight of at least 55 kg and or a body mass index of 22-35 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
* previous treatment with systemic corticosteroids or a change in dosage of thyroid hormones in the previous 6 weeks
* the use of insulin within the 3 months prior to screening
* allergy or hypersensitivity to target medication or any of its components
* history of type 1 diabetes; acute metabolic complications of diabetes (e.g. ketoacidosis or hyperosmolar state (coma or precoma)) within the preceding 6 months
* haematological disorders
* history of angioedema with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, or treated diabetic gastric paresis
* renal failure, moderate or severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance\<50 ㎖/min; or estimated glomerular filtration rate\<50 ㎖/min/1.73㎡) before screening
* Serious heart failure or prior history of heart failure(NYHA Class Ⅲ or Ⅳ heart failure.
* impaired hepatic function (defined as elevated serum levels of either alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase or alkaline phosphatase 2.5-fold the upper limit of the normal range \[ULN\] or elevated serum total bilirubin levels 2.5-fold ULN)
* hereditary complications (limited to lactose containing medicines) such as galactose intolerance, deficiency of Lapp lactase, glucose-galactose malabsorption syndrome, etc
* cardiovascular disease, myocardial infarction, or in the previous 6 months; coronary angioplasty, coronary stent placement
* serious cerebrovascular, stroke, transient ischemic attack in the previous 6 months
* laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy
* history of alcohol or drug abuse in the previous 3 months
* history of all of cancers not in remission for 5 years
* Active bladder cancer
* experience of a major operation
* premenopausal women who were nursing or pregnant were also ineligible for trial participation
* external injury, acute infections, a history/presence of any other severe disease, or severe trauma
* fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level of \>239.6mg/dL
* systolic or diastolic blood pressure \>160 mmHg or \>100 mmHg, respectively
* serum creatinine level of \>1.5mg/dL for men or 1.3mg/dL for women
* fasting cholesterol \>250mg/dL
* thyroid-stimulating hormone higher than the upper limit of normal
* hemoglobin level is below 12 g/dL for men and below 10 g/dL for women
* fasting triglyceride levels\> 5.1 mmol/l (452 mg/dL)
19 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Pusan National University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
In Ju Kim
Department of Internal Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
In Joo Kim, MD., PhD.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Pusan National University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pusan National University Hospital
Busan, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kim JM, Kim SS, Kim JH, Kim MK, Kim TN, Lee SH, Lee CW, Park JY, Kim ES, Lee KJ, Choi YS, Kim DK, Kim IJ. Efficacy and Safety of Pioglitazone versus Glimepiride after Metformin and Alogliptin Combination Therapy: A Randomized, Open-Label, Multicenter, Parallel-Controlled Study. Diabetes Metab J. 2020 Feb;44(1):67-77. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2018.0274. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ALO-IIT-013
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.