Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
2079 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
1991-06-19
2020-05-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of High-Legume Diet on Colorectal Cancer Risk
NCT00339469
Colorectal Polyps Screening With Low-dose CT Colonoscopy
NCT03064828
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Water and Air Colonoscopy in a Community Based Setting
NCT01729416
Biological, Genetic, and Lifestyle Risk Factors for Developing Colorectal Adenomas or Polyps in Participants Undergoing Colonoscopy
NCT00625066
Colonoscopy vs Stool Testing for Older Adults With Colon Polyps
NCT05612347
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary objective of the Polyp Prevention Trial (PPT) is to determine whether a low fat, high fiber, high vegetable and fruit eating plan will decrease the recurrence of adenomatous polyps of the large bowel. Secondary objectives of the PPT include 1) evaluating the effectiveness of the intervention program with respect to participant achievement of dietary goals; 2) examining the relation of dietary change and biochemical markers in blood; and 3) assessing the impact of the intervention on quality of life indicators.
BACKGROUND:
Nearly 60,000 men and women will die from large bowel cancer in the United States this year, making it the second leading cause of death from malignant disease in this country. The evidence that diet plays a key role in large bowel carcinogenesis is strong and growing. The PPT was undertaken because it is unlikely, with respect to diet and large bowel cancer, that any combination of further animal research, clinical investigations employing non-neoplastic endpoints, or observational epidemiologic studies would be sufficiently persuasive to influence public health policy.
A large body of ecologic, analytic epidemiologic, human metabolic, and animal experimental data suggests that three dietary factors increase the risk of large bowel cancer: high dietary fat, low dietary fiber, and low vegetable and fruit intake. Previous dietary intervention studies have generally focused on a single nutrient. The PPT is unique in that three dietary factors are being investigated simultaneously through intervention with a realistic, comprehensive dietary pattern change. NCI investigators adopted this multiple-goal dietary intervention strategy in the PPT for several reasons: people eat foods, not isolated nutrients; there may be unknown protective food constituents not encompassed in a single-nutrient intervention; and there may well be important synergistic effects of various food components best captured in a comprehensive, multifactor dietary pattern. Moreover, by embracing three promising dietary hypotheses simultaneously, the PPT intervention is intended to maximize the possibility of reducing polyp recurrence. The direct demonstration of any effect of diet on the large bowel neoplastic process would be a major advance.
Large bowel adenomas (polyps) present a unique opportunity to conduct an intervention trial because of the high prevalence of these lesions in the general population (over 30% in adults over 50 years of age), the high polyp recurrence rate (at least 10% annually) in those who have undergone adenoma removal, and the strong link between adenomas and cancer (the so-called adenoma-carcinoma sequence). It is generally accepted that large bowel adenomas are an obligate precursor lesion for most large bowel cancers. An intervention reducing the recurrence of large bowel polyps would thus have a strong likelihood of reducing the incidence of large bowel cancer.
DESIGN:
The PPT is a randomized, controlled trial being carried out at eight Clinical Centers in the United States. The Data and Nutrition Coordinating Center (DNCC) is Westat, Inc., Rockville, Maryland. The target sample size of 2000 permits the detection with 90% power of a reduction of 24% in the polyp recurrence rate.
The dietary goals for the intervention arm are 20% of calories from fat, 18g fiber/1000 kcal, and 5-8 servings of fruits and vegetables (the exact number based on caloric intake). The usual (control) diet, based on data from national surveys, is expected to comprise approximately 35% of calories from fat, 10-15 g per day of dietary fiber, and 3.5 servings of vegetables and fruits daily.
The overall strategy for the intervention program is to reduce calories from fat and to replace them with calories from fruits vegetables and grains thus increasing dietary fiber intake. The intervention program, patterned after the approach used in the feasibility phase of the Women's Health Trial, integrates nutrition education and behavior modification techniques. Although initial counseling sessions are carried out one-on-one by the PPT nutritionists, most intervention group members participate in group counseling after the first year.
The control group is not offered a nutrition intervention program since the general strategy adopted for this group will be minimum interference with customary diets while collecting nutritional data considered necessary for appropriate comparison with the nutrition intervention group. Subjects in the control group are expected to maintain their usual diet.
Three different dietary assessment instruments are used in the PPT: a modified Block/NCI Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), Four Day Food Records (4DFR), and 24 Hour Recalls.
Participants undergo colonoscopy again at one (T1) and four (T4) years into the study. Over 280 endoscopists participating in the PPT carry out the T1 and T4 colonoscopies. Although the recurrence of one or more adenomas is the primary endpoint of the study, it will also be possible to relate the dietary intervention to number, size, and histotype of polyps. Because some polyps (10-15%) tend to be missed at baseline, the primary analytic interval (on which sample size calculations were based) is T1 through T4.
The presence of one or more adenomas at the qualifying colonoscopy--a key eligibility factor for PPT--was determined by Clinical Center trial pathologists who had been previously oriented by the central pathologists to PPT pathologic criteria. The number, size, and location of adenomas at baseline was determined by the participating endoscopists. To standardize the histologic diagnoses used in endpoint ascertainment, the PPT requires that histologic type and extent of atypia be determined by the central pathologists for all lesions removed at baseline, T1, and T4.
Blood specimens are collected on all participants annually; these are analyzed on a 20% participant sample (the same individuals for whom the diet records are analyzed) for lipids, carotenoids, and vitamins A and E. Blood specimens are also available for other analyses including hormone and molecular genetic analysis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
low fat, high fiber, high fruit and vegetable eating plan
low fat, high fiber, high fruit and vegetable eating plan
Participants were randomized to a low fat, high fiber, high fruit and vegetable (intervention arm) or their usual diet (control arm)
2
Usual Diet
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
low fat, high fiber, high fruit and vegetable eating plan
Participants were randomized to a low fat, high fiber, high fruit and vegetable (intervention arm) or their usual diet (control arm)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
Carcinoma in any polyp removed at baseline endoscopy. High grade dysplasia is not considered carcinoma for purposes of study eligibility.
Failure to examine the cecum during baseline colonoscopy.
Incomplete removal of polyps at baseline colonoscopy.
Surgical removal of polyps.
Familial polyposis or other polyposis syndromes.
Adenomatous polyp discovered before the age of 35.
History of large bowel cancer, including intramucosal carcinoma.
History of histologically or radiographically confirmed inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease).
History of large bowel resection.
Weight move than 150% of desirable weight according to the 1983 Metropolitan Life Insurance Tables.
Use of lipid-lowering drugs in pharmacologic doses in the last month.
Major life-limiting conditions reducing likelihood of completing 4-year follow-up.
Already consuming a dietary pattern similar to the intervention eating plan.
Any dietary practice, behavior, or attitude that would substantially limit adherence to the intervention program.
Participation in other clinical studies that may interfere with participation in the PPT.
Unable or unwilling to sign informed consent form.
Found to be unreliable and uncooperative providers of dietary information during the pre-randomization period.
Able to give reasonable assurance of remaining in the Clinical Center area for duration of the study.
35 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Gwen A Murphy
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Cancer Institute (NCI), 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hill MJ, Morson BC, Bussey HJ. Aetiology of adenoma--carcinoma sequence in large bowel. Lancet. 1978 Feb 4;1(8058):245-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90487-7.
Zaridze DG. Environmental etiology of large-bowel cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1983 Mar;70(3):389-400. No abstract available.
Drasar BS, Irving D. Environmental factors and cancer of the colon and breast. Br J Cancer. 1973 Feb;27(2):167-72. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1973.20.
Byrd DA, Vogtmann E, Ortega-Villa AM, Wan Y, Gomez M, Hogue S, Warner A, Zhu B, Dagnall C, Jones K, Hicks B, Albert PS, Murphy G, Sinha R. Prospective and Cross-sectional Associations of the Rectal Tissue Microbiome with Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Mar 6;32(3):435-443. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-22-0608.
Perera T, Young MR, Zhang Z, Murphy G, Colburn NH, Lanza E, Hartman TJ, Cross AJ, Bobe G. Identification and monitoring of metabolite markers of dry bean consumption in parallel human and mouse studies. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2015 Apr;59(4):795-806. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201400847. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
OH91-C-0159
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
9999910159
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.