Clinical Validation of PolyDeep: an Artificial Intelligence-based Computer-aided Polyp Detection (CADe) and Characterization (CADx) System. Polydeep Advance 3

NCT ID: NCT05513261

Last Updated: 2025-02-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

857 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-11-17

Study Completion Date

2024-05-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is a clinical validation of PolyDeep, a computer-aided polyp detection (CADe) and characterization (CADx) system. PolyDeep Advance 3 is a multicentric randomized clinical trial comparing high definition colonoscopy with PolyDeep assisted high definition colonoscopy. The hypothesis of the study is that the PolyDeep assisted colonoscopy increases the Adenoma Detection Rate (ADR).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most frequently cancer in western world. A fundamental tool for detection and prevention is the colonoscopy. The detection and endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps, the precursor lesion of CRC, can reduce CRC incidence and mortality. Adenoma Detection Rate is the most used endoscopic quality indicator. The improvement of this indicator is related to the reduction of postcolonoscopy CRC incidence and mortality.

Colorectal polyp diagnosis is based on endoscopic resection and histological analysis. An accurate optical diagnosis could avoid histological lesion of smaller lesions, reducing the costs associated with histological diagnosis. The NICE (NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic) Classification has proposed use high definition endoscopes that have Narrow Band Imaging (NBI). However, NICE must be used by endoscopists who are sufficiently prepared and who have overcome the learning curve. Therefore, optical histology diagnosis with high accuracy independently of the center and the endoscopist is necessary.

Computer Aid Diagnosis (CAD) systems based on Artificial Intelligence are experiencing exponential development in the field of medical image analysis. The development of the CAD system is based on the creation of large databases of endoscopic images and/or videos, on the training, development and validation of diagnostic algorithms in such databases and, finally, on prospective clinical validation in patients undergoing colonoscopy. The goal of CAD systems in colonoscopy is double. First, the CAD system aims to increase the detection of polyps (CADe) in general, and of adenomas and serrated lesions in particular. The second objective is to characterize (CADx) the histology of detected lesion.

PolyDeep CAD is a functional prototype. This CAD system is capable of detecting, locating and classifying colorectal polyps. In vivo validation data shows that PolyDeep has high diagnostic accuracy for polyp identification and that this accuracy can be accommodated. The aim of PolyDeep advance 3 is to compare Adenoma Detection Rate differences in a randomized clinical trial. The investigators will compare the Adenoma Detection Rate between high definition colonoscopy and PolyDeep assisted high definition colonoscopy, both in CRC screening and surveillance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients who fulfill criteria will be randomly allocated to high definition colonoscopy or Polydeep assisted high definition colonoscopy.
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control arm: High definition colonoscopy

Diagnostic test: Standard colonoscopy

Group Type OTHER

High definition colonoscopy (standard colonoscopy) in Adenoma Detection Rate

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

In the intervention of this arm the investigators will apply the standard colonoscopy without computer-aided colonoscopy (polyDeep)

PolyDeep assisted high definition colonoscopy

Diagnostic test: PolyDeep

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PolyDeep assisted high definition colonoscopy (CAD system) in Adenoma Detection Rate

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

In the intervention of this arm the investigators will apply polyDeep assisted high definition colonoscopy (CAD system).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High definition colonoscopy (standard colonoscopy) in Adenoma Detection Rate

In the intervention of this arm the investigators will apply the standard colonoscopy without computer-aided colonoscopy (polyDeep)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

PolyDeep assisted high definition colonoscopy (CAD system) in Adenoma Detection Rate

In the intervention of this arm the investigators will apply polyDeep assisted high definition colonoscopy (CAD system).

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* First diagnostic colonoscopy performed after a positive fecal immunochemical test performed within the CRC screening program.
* Surveillance after resection of colorectal adenomas
* Acceptance after reading the information sheet and signing informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Colonoscopies with insufficient intestinal cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale \<6 or \<2 in any of the evaluated segments).
* Incomplete colonoscopy without cecal intubation.
* Previous CRC
* Previous colonic resection.
* Hereditary CRC syndromes
* Serrated polyposis syndrome
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ministry of Work and Welfare - Xunta de Galicia

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Asociación Española de Gastroenterología

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

European Regional Development Fund

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Fundacin Biomedica Galicia Sur

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense

Ourense, Ourense, Spain

Site Status

Hospital de Montecelo

Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain

Site Status

Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro (Vigo)

Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cubiella J, Marzo-Castillejo M, Mascort-Roca JJ, Amador-Romero FJ, Bellas-Beceiro B, Clofent-Vilaplana J, Carballal S, Ferrandiz-Santos J, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Jover R, Mangas-Sanjuan C, Moreira L, Pellise M, Quintero E, Rodriguez-Camacho E, Vega-Villaamil P; Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria y Asociacion Espanola de Gastroenterologia. Clinical practice guideline. Diagnosis and prevention of colorectal cancer. 2018 Update. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;41(9):585-596. doi: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Sep 20. English, Spanish.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30245076 (View on PubMed)

Corley DA, Jensen CD, Marks AR, Zhao WK, Lee JK, Doubeni CA, Zauber AG, de Boer J, Fireman BH, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Ghai NR, Levin TR, Quesenberry CP. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 3;370(14):1298-306. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24693890 (View on PubMed)

Zhao S, Wang S, Pan P, Xia T, Chang X, Yang X, Guo L, Meng Q, Yang F, Qian W, Xu Z, Wang Y, Wang Z, Gu L, Wang R, Jia F, Yao J, Li Z, Bai Y. Magnitude, Risk Factors, and Factors Associated With Adenoma Miss Rate of Tandem Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(6):1661-1674.e11. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.260. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30738046 (View on PubMed)

Liu A, Wang H, Lin Y, Fu L, Liu Y, Yan S, Chen H. Gastrointestinal endoscopy nurse assistance during colonoscopy and polyp detection: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Aug 21;99(34):e21278. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021278.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32846754 (View on PubMed)

ASGE Technology Committee; Abu Dayyeh BK, Thosani N, Konda V, Wallace MB, Rex DK, Chauhan SS, Hwang JH, Komanduri S, Manfredi M, Maple JT, Murad FM, Siddiqui UD, Banerjee S. ASGE Technology Committee systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the ASGE PIVI thresholds for adopting real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar;81(3):502.e1-502.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.12.022. Epub 2015 Jan 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25597420 (View on PubMed)

Puig I, Lopez-Ceron M, Arnau A, Rosinol O, Cuatrecasas M, Herreros-de-Tejada A, Ferrandez A, Serra-Burriel M, Nogales O, Vida F, de Castro L, Lopez-Vicente J, Vega P, Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Gonzalez-Santiago J, Hernandez-Conde M, Diez-Redondo P, Rivero-Sanchez L, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Burgos A, Garcia-Alonso FJ, Bustamante-Balen M, Martinez-Bauer E, Penas B, Pellise M; EndoCAR group, Spanish Gastroenterological Association and the Spanish Digestive Endoscopy Society. Accuracy of the Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification System in Identification of Deep Invasion in Colorectal Polyps. Gastroenterology. 2019 Jan;156(1):75-87. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30296432 (View on PubMed)

Jin EH, Lee D, Bae JH, Kang HY, Kwak MS, Seo JY, Yang JI, Yang SY, Lim SH, Yim JY, Lim JH, Chung GE, Chung SJ, Choi JM, Han YM, Kang SJ, Lee J, Chan Kim H, Kim JS. Improved Accuracy in Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Visual Explanations. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jun;158(8):2169-2179.e8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2020.02.036. Epub 2020 Feb 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32119927 (View on PubMed)

Hassan C, Spadaccini M, Iannone A, Maselli R, Jovani M, Chandrasekar VT, Antonelli G, Yu H, Areia M, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Bhandari P, Sharma P, Rex DK, Rosch T, Wallace M, Repici A. Performance of artificial intelligence in colonoscopy for adenoma and polyp detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):77-85.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.06.059. Epub 2020 Jun 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32598963 (View on PubMed)

Parmar R, Martel M, Rostom A, Barkun AN. Validated Scales for Colon Cleansing: A Systematic Review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016 Feb;111(2):197-204; quiz 205. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2015.417. Epub 2016 Jan 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26782820 (View on PubMed)

Wani S, Rastogi A. Narrow-band imaging in the prediction of submucosal invasive colon cancer: how "NICE" is it? Gastrointest Endosc. 2013 Oct;78(4):633-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2013.06.015. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24054741 (View on PubMed)

Parsa N, Rex DK, Byrne MF. Colorectal polyp characterization with standard endoscopy: Will Artificial Intelligence succeed where human eyes failed? Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun-Aug;52-53:101736. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2021.101736. Epub 2021 Feb 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34172255 (View on PubMed)

Mangas-Sanjuan C, Santana E, Cubiella J, Rodriguez-Camacho E, Seoane A, Alvarez-Gonzalez MA, Suarez A, Alvarez-Garcia V, Gonzalez N, Lue A, Cid-Gomez L, Ponce M, Bujanda L, Portillo I, Pellise M, Diez-Redondo P, Herraiz M, Ono A, Pizarro A, Zapater P, Jover R; QUALISCOPIA Study Investigators. Variation in Colonoscopy Performance Measures According to Procedure Indication. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 May;18(5):1216-1223.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.08.035. Epub 2019 Aug 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31446179 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://polydeep.org/

Polydeep website

https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S246812531930411X

Effect of a deep-learning computer-aided detection system on adenoma detection during colonoscopy (CADe-DB trial): a double-blind randomised study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PolyDeep Advance 3.0

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.