Spinal Anesthesia With Articaine and Lidocaine for Outpatient Surgery.
NCT ID: NCT00247741
Last Updated: 2013-12-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
80 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-11-30
2006-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Lidocaine is one of the agents that is used most frequently. It has been associated with an increased incidence of Transient Neurological Symptoms (TNS). Articaine is another agent that is being used more often and is said to act faster and shorter than lidocaine.
We will compare spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and articaine in a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Endpoint are:
* onset of sensory and motor block
* recovery from sensory and motor block
* time to micturition
* patient satisfaction
* complications
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
lidocaine
spinal administration of lidocaine
articaine
spinal administration of articaine
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
spinal administration of articaine
spinal administration of lidocaine
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* ASA I-III
* Patients planned for a short surgical procedure on lower extremities or lower abdomen.
* Procedure in day-case setting
* Procedure under spinal anesthesia
* Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* History of allergic reactions on amide-type local anesthetics
* Pregnancy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Antonius Hospital
OTHER
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Leon Timmerman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
St Antonius Hospital, dept. of anesthesiology
Emile MJ Andriessen, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
St Antonius Hospital, dept of anesthesiology
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St Antonius Hospital
Nieuwegein, Utrecht, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Vree TB, Gielen MJ. Clinical pharmacology and the use of articaine for local and regional anaesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Jun;19(2):293-308. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2004.12.006.
Kaukinen S, Eerola R, Eerola M, Kaukinen L. A comparison of carticaine and lidocaine in spinal anaesthesia. Ann Clin Res. 1978 Aug;10(4):191-4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Articaine
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id