Spinal Anesthesia With Articaine and Lidocaine for Outpatient Surgery.

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

80 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-11-30

Study Completion Date

2006-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare two short-acting local anesthetics, articaine and lidocaine, for spinal anesthesia in day-case surgery. The onset time of the sensory- and motor block, recovery time until discharge and complications will be studied.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Spinal Anesthesia With Articaine and Bupivacaine for Outpatient Lower Limb Surgery

NCT00332735

Spinal Anesthesia

COMPLETED PHASE3

Testing the Feasibility of Using Ropivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Patients With Lower Back Surgery

NCT05824338

Anesthesia, Spinal Neurosurgery Ropivacaine +1 more

RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1

Opioid Sparing Anesthesia in Lumbar Spine Surgery

NCT05594407

Pain, Postoperative Pain, Acute Pain, Chronic +7 more

UNKNOWN NA

Erector Spine Block for Back Surgery

NCT03214536

Spine Disease Regional Anaesthesia

COMPLETED NA

Efficacy of Opioid-free Anesthesia in Reducing Postoperative Pain in Chronic Pain Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery

NCT02752477

Chronic Pain Anesthesia

UNKNOWN PHASE3

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The ideal spinal anesthesia in day-case surgery is characterized by a short onset of sensory and motor blockade, and a rapid recovery after the operation. Short-acting local-anesthetics are used frequently in this setting.

Lidocaine is one of the agents that is used most frequently. It has been associated with an increased incidence of Transient Neurological Symptoms (TNS). Articaine is another agent that is being used more often and is said to act faster and shorter than lidocaine.

We will compare spinal anesthesia with lidocaine and articaine in a randomized double-blind clinical trial. Endpoint are:

* onset of sensory and motor block
* recovery from sensory and motor block
* time to micturition
* patient satisfaction
* complications

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

lidocaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

spinal administration of lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

articaine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

spinal administration of articaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

spinal administration of articaine

Intervention Type DRUG

spinal administration of lidocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \> 18 years
* ASA I-III
* Patients planned for a short surgical procedure on lower extremities or lower abdomen.
* Procedure in day-case setting
* Procedure under spinal anesthesia
* Informed consent