Spinal Prilocaine for Caesarian Sections

NCT ID: NCT03219086

Last Updated: 2022-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

182 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-08-01

Study Completion Date

2022-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prilocaine theoretically could provide faster onset because of its lower pKa (7,7) compared to bupivacaine (8,1). The primary objective of this prospective double blind randomized trial is to determine block onset of spinal hyperbaric prilocaine compared to bupivacaine, both with a small dose of sufentanyl as an additive.The primary hypothesis is that a significant larger amount of patients will gain surgical readiness within 8 minutes after spinal injection of prilocaine with sufentanyl compared to bupivacaine with sufentanyl. Surgical readiness is defined as a sensory block level of T5 tested by loss of cold sensation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is designed as a randomised prospective double blind multi centre study.

Following approval by the Hospital Ethics committee of the University Hospital Antwerp and all participating hospitals, all-in term (37-42 weeks of gestation) pregnant women planned for a caesarean section will be asked to participate in this trial.

Patients will be randomised to receive either spinal prilocaine with sufentanyl or spinal bupivacaine with sufentanyl.The patient, the anaesthetist performing the CSE and the observer are not aware of the local anaesthetic solution administered.

Preoperative a combined spinal epidural puncture will be performed in the sitting position at the level of L2-L3 or L3-L4 . Vital parameters will be registered at regular intervals. Block characteristics ( onset, duration and intensity of the sensory block and motor block) will be measured at regular intervals.

Patients with insufficient analgesia will receive a top up dose of 5 ml lidocaine 2 % via the epidural catheter.

Time of birth, neonatal outcome (Apgar score 1 min, 5 min and 10 minutes after birth) and admission to the nicu as well as umbilicus venous and arterial blood gasses are recorded.

Patients will be discharged from the PACU when motor block reached a Bromage score 1 Time intervals of discharge to the ward will be registered.At the maternity ward the time of first contact of the baby and the mother and first breast feed (if applicable) will be registered.

One week postoperative patients will be called and asked if they experienced any postoperative symptoms like headache, micturition problems or symptoms resembling Transient Neurological Symptoms

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Combined Spinal Epidural Anesthesia Prilocaine Bupivacaine Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

prospective double blind randomised
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
The spinal solution will be prepared by an independent anaesthetist, anaesthetist trainee or research nurse on a sterile table after opening the sealed envelope with the appointed study group. The patient, the anaesthetist performing the CSE and the observer are not aware of the local anaesthetic solution administered.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group M

combined spinal epidural anesthesia with spinal administration of 7,5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0,5% (Marcaine H) + 2,5mcg sufentanyl ( 5 mcg/ml)( Janssens -cilag) +1 ml nacl0,9%

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

combined spinal epidural anaesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

To give surgical anesthesia for performance of the caesarian section a combined spinal epidural anesthesia will be performed with different spinal solutions according to the appointed study group

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

combined spinal epidural anesthesia with spinal administration of 7,5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0,5% (Marcaine H) + 2,5mcg sufentanyl ( 5 mcg/ml)( Janssens -cilag) +1 ml nacl0,9%

Group P

A combined spinal epidural anesthesia with spinal administration of 50 mg hyperbaric prilocaine 2% (Tachipri, Nordic Pharma) + 2,5mcg sufentanyl (5 mcg/ml) (Janssens-cilag)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

combined spinal epidural anaesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

To give surgical anesthesia for performance of the caesarian section a combined spinal epidural anesthesia will be performed with different spinal solutions according to the appointed study group

Prilocaine

Intervention Type DRUG

A combined spinal epidural anesthesia with spinal administration of 50 mg hyperbaric prilocaine 2% (Tachipri, Nordic Pharma) + 2,5mcg sufentanyl (5 mcg/ml) (Janssens-cilag)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

combined spinal epidural anaesthesia

To give surgical anesthesia for performance of the caesarian section a combined spinal epidural anesthesia will be performed with different spinal solutions according to the appointed study group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Prilocaine

A combined spinal epidural anesthesia with spinal administration of 50 mg hyperbaric prilocaine 2% (Tachipri, Nordic Pharma) + 2,5mcg sufentanyl (5 mcg/ml) (Janssens-cilag)

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine

combined spinal epidural anesthesia with spinal administration of 7,5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine 0,5% (Marcaine H) + 2,5mcg sufentanyl ( 5 mcg/ml)( Janssens -cilag) +1 ml nacl0,9%

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

CSE Spinal anesthesia prilocaine Tachipri Marcaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* A term Pregnant women (37-42 weeks)scheduled for caesarian section

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal
* Twin or multiple pregnancy
* Preeclampsia
* Contraindication neuraxial technique
* Indication general anaesthesia
* BMI before pregnancy \>35
* Maternal height \<155 cm
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AZ Klina

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

AZ Middelheim

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Antwerp

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr M. B. Breebaart

MD, PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

AZ Middelheim

Berchem, Antwerpen, Belgium

Site Status

AZ KLina

Brasschaat, Antwerp, Belgium

Site Status

University Hospital Antwerp

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ec nr 17/07/77

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.