GALLANT 9 Tesaglitazar vs. Placebo in Combination With Insulin

NCT ID: NCT00242372

Last Updated: 2009-04-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

370 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2004-08-31

Study Completion Date

2006-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a 24-week randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled study of tesaglitazar in patients with type 2 diabetes who are not adequately controlled on insulin (along or in combination with one or more oral antidiabetic agents in addition to diet and lifestyle advice). The study comprises a 3-week enrollment period and a 24-week randomized, double blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled treatment period and a 3-week follow-up. Patients must receive at least 30 units of insulin per day and will continue their current oral antidiabetic treatment regimen throughout the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tesaglitazar 0.5

Intervention Type DRUG

Insulin at least 30 units/day

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provision of a written informed consent
* Men or women who are \>=18 years of age
* Female patients: postmenopausal, hysterectomized, or if of childbearing potential, using a reliable method of birth control
* Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for less than 20 years and receiving at least 30 U insulin per day

Exclusion Criteria

* Type 1 diabetes
* New York Heart Association heart failure Class III or IV
* Treatment with any thiazolidinedione class of antidiabetic agents
* History of hypersensitivity or intolerance to any peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist (like Actos or Avandia), fenofibrate, metformin or 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin)
* History of drug-induced myopathy or drug-induced creatine kinase elevation, liver enzyme elevations, neutropenia (low white blood cells)
* Creatinine levels above twice the normal range
* Creatine kinase above 3 times the upper limit of normal
* Received any investigational product in other clinical studies within 12 weeks
* Any clinically significant abnormality identified on physical examination, laboratory tests or electrocardiogram, which in the judgment of the investigator would compromise the patient's safety or successful participation in the clinical study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

AstraZeneca Galida Medical Sciences Director, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

AstraZeneca

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tuscson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greenbrae, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Northridge, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Riverside, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spring Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Waterbury, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Augusta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dunwoody, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago Heights, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Gurnee, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cadillac, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond Heights, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

North Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pahrump, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dover, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Roseland, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Hyde Park, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Wilmington, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kettering, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cheswick, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Erie, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbia, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Corpus Christie, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bellevue, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Renton, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Madison, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

D6160C00033

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

GALLANT 6 Tesaglitazar vs. Pioglitazone
NCT00214565 TERMINATED PHASE3
GALLANT 5 Tesaglitazar Versus Metformin
NCT00214591 TERMINATED PHASE3