Efficacy and Safety of Exenatide Once Weekly Suspension in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

NCT ID: NCT01652716

Last Updated: 2018-07-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

377 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To compare the effect on glycemic control (HbA1c) of exenatide suspension administered once weekly to that achieved by exenatide administered twice daily for 28 weeks in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

To examine the long-term (52 weeks of treatment) safety and effect on glucose control of exenatide suspension administered once weekly in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exenatide once weekly suspension

Exenatide suspension 2 mg weekly subcutaneous injection

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exenatide once weekly suspension

Intervention Type DRUG

Exenatide suspension 2 mg weekly subcutaneous injection

Exenatide twice daily (BID)

Exenatide 5 mcg BID for 4 weeks followed by 10 mcg BID for 24 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Exenatide twice daily

Intervention Type DRUG

5 mcg twice daily for 4 weeks followed by 10 mcg twice daily for 24 weeks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exenatide once weekly suspension

Exenatide suspension 2 mg weekly subcutaneous injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Exenatide twice daily

5 mcg twice daily for 4 weeks followed by 10 mcg twice daily for 24 weeks

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Byetta

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* At least 18 years old
* Diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus
* HbA1c 7.1 to 11%, inclusive, at screening
* Fasting plasma glucose \<280 mg/dL (15.5 mmol/L)
* Body mass index (BMI) \<=45 kg/m2, inclusive, at screening
* Treated with diet and exercise or a stable regimen of metformin, sulfonylurea, pioglitazone or any 2 of these agents

Exclusion Criteria

* History of pancreatitis or triglycerides \>=500 mg/dL
* Medullary carcinoma or multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN2) or a family history of either
* Active cardiovascular disease
* Presence of congestive heart failure
* Liver disease
* History of severe gastrointestinal diseases
* Repeated severe hypoglycemia within the last 6 months
* Any previous use of exenatide or other glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1 ) analog
* Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor use in the last 3 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Vice President Medical Research & Development, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amylin Pharmaceuticals, LLC.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mesa, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Escondido, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Garden Grove, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lomita, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spring Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Walnut Creek, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kissimmee, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oviedo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ponte Vedra, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Paducah, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbia, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Elkridge, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hyattsville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Troy, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Edina, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Port Gibson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Research Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Butte, Montana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Endwell, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Windsor, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Harleysville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Manassas, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Olympia, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wysham CH, Rosenstock J, Vetter ML, Wang H, Hardy E, Iqbal N. Further improvement in glycemic control after switching from exenatide two times per day to exenatide once-weekly autoinjected suspension in patients with type 2 diabetes: 52-week results from the DURATION-NEO-1 study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Oct;8(1):e000773. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000773.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33037036 (View on PubMed)

Wysham CH, Rosenstock J, Vetter ML, Dong F, Ohman P, Iqbal N. Efficacy and tolerability of the new autoinjected suspension of exenatide once weekly versus exenatide twice daily in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):165-172. doi: 10.1111/dom.13056. Epub 2017 Aug 22.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 28685973 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MB001-003

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

BCB118

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.