Phase III Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Added Exenatide Versus Placebo to Titrated Basal Insulin Glargine in Inadequately Controlled Patients With Type II Diabetes Mellitus

NCT ID: NCT02229383

Last Updated: 2019-01-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

464 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-06

Study Completion Date

2016-08-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study D5553C00002 is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, Phase 3 study to compare the safety and efficacy of exenatide once weekly (EQW) added to titrated basal insulin glargine with or without metformin to placebo added to titrated basal insulin glargine with or without metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Eligible patients will be randomized at Visit 5 (Day 1) to receive either EQW added to titrated basal insulin glargine, with or without metformin ≥1500 mg/day, or placebo added to titrated basal insulin glargine, with or without metformin ≥1500 mg/day, during the 28-week treatment period.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Diabetes Mellitus

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Exenatide

Exenatide 2 mg 1 time per week + titrated basal insulin glargine with or without metformin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exenatide

Intervention Type DRUG

2 mg weekly suspension injection

Placebo

Placebo 2 mg 1 time per week + titrated basal insulin glargine with or without metformin

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Exenatide matching placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Once weekly Placebo injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Exenatide

2 mg weekly suspension injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Exenatide matching placebo

Once weekly Placebo injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Has a diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
* Has HbA1c of 7.5% to 12.0%, inclusive, at Visit 1 (Screening).
* Has fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentration \<280 mg/dL (15.6 mmol/L) at Visit 1 (Screening)
* Treated with basal insulin glargine at a dose of ≥20 units/day once daily for at least 6 weeks prior to Screening, in combination with diet and exercise alone or in combination with:

1. a stable dose of metformin (≥1500 mg/day) for at least 8 weeks prior to Visit 1
2. a stable dose of metformin (≥1500 mg/day) for at least 8 weeks prior to Visit 1 (Screening) and a stable dose of sulfonylurea for at least 8 weeks prior to the Screening visit

Exclusion Criteria

* Serum calcitonin concentration ≥40 pg/mL (≥40 ng/L) at Visit 1 (Screening)
* History of, or currently have, acute or chronic pancreatitis, or have triglyceride concentrations ≥500 mg/dL (≥5.65 mmol/L) at Visit 1
* Positive serological test for hepatitis B or hepatitis C
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

130 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Muscle Shoals, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tempe, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chino, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chula Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

El Cajon, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mission Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tustin, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Brooksville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chiefland, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

North Miami Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbus, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Avon, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Franklin, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Newton, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Monroe, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hazelwood, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bellevue, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Haddon Heights, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mooresville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Morehead City, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Morganton, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dayton, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Medford, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spartanburg, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Johnson City, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Kingsport, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Clinton, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Manassas, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Port Orchard, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Baja, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Balatonfüred, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Eger, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Gödöllő, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Komárom, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Létavértes, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Sátoraljaújhely, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szekszárd, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Oświęcim, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Zamość, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Zgierz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Baia Mare, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Galati, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Oradea, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Ploieşti, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Tg Mures, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Timișoara, , Romania

Site Status

Research Site

Bardejov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Dolný Kubín, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Levice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Levice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Lučenec, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Nitra, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Štúrovo, , Slovakia

Site Status

Research Site

Bloemfontein, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Kempton Park, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Krugersdorp, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Paarl, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Pretoria, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Somerset West, , South Africa

Site Status

Research Site

Worcester, , South Africa

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Hungary Poland Romania Slovakia South Africa

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Guja C, Frias JP, Suchower L, Hardy E, Marr G, Sjostrom CD, Jabbour SA. Safety and Efficacy of Exenatide Once Weekly in Participants with Type 2 Diabetes and Stage 2/3 Chronic Kidney Disease. Diabetes Ther. 2020 Jul;11(7):1467-1480. doi: 10.1007/s13300-020-00815-z. Epub 2020 Apr 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32306296 (View on PubMed)

Guja C, Frias JP, Somogyi A, Jabbour S, Wang H, Hardy E, Rosenstock J. Effect of exenatide QW or placebo, both added to titrated insulin glargine, in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: The DURATION-7 randomized study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jul;20(7):1602-1614. doi: 10.1111/dom.13266. Epub 2018 Mar 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29473704 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2014-003502-33

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

D5553C00002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.