Efficacy of the WalkAide and AFOs for CVA

NCT ID: NCT00216320

Last Updated: 2013-04-19

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

121 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-09-30

Study Completion Date

2008-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To assess the effectiveness of a new stimulator (WalkAide) for the treatment of foot drop. The comparison will involve physical measurements (e.g. walking speed, physiological cost index, Modified Rivermead Mobility Index, etc.) and questionnaires on the quality of life and acceptance of the technology by stroke survivors.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Stroke is the third leading cause of death in the United States and other developed countries and a major source of disability, often leading to hospitalization. Prognosis for regaining the ability to walk is good, with 64% of those initially dependent in walking regaining independence by three months. However, many gait abnormalities persist.

Reduced hip, knee and ankle excursions during swing are among the persistent gait abnormalities contributing to poor or inefficient limb clearance. This is generally referred to as "foot drop", since the foot drops or drags along the ground during the swing phase. Swing phase abnormalities can result in decreased velocity, limited endurance and an increased risk for falls. These factors can limit mobility and independence in the community. Therefore, intervention is warranted.

The conventional approach to address the poor swing limb function, specifically, insufficient ankle dorsiflexion, is the prescription of an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). An AFO commonly limits ankle plantarflexion to enhance limb clearance during swing. An alternative approach is to stimulate the ankle dorsiflexors electrically during swing phase to reproduce motion, which can no longer be performed volitionally.

The WalkAide is a new foot drop stimulator. This small, self-contained device attaches to the leg below the knee. The WalkAide contains a number of patented features, including a tilt sensor that measures the orientation of the leg with respect to the vertical. When the leg is tilted back at the end of stance, stimulation of the common peroneal nerve is initiated. This produces flexion of the ankle and other joints (if a flexion reflex is elicited) so that the leg can clear the ground during swing. When the leg is tilted forward at the end of swing phase, the stimulus is terminated. The electrodes attach to the inside of a cuff that is molded to the leg for reproducible positioning from day to day. The device is also designed so that all operations can be done with a single hand, since hemiparesis may prevent the subject from using the other hand. Because of its enhanced features, the WalkAide is anticipated to increase walking speed and improve the quality of life.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

WalkAide

Subjects wear WalkAide for 6 weeks then cross over to AFO wear for 6 weeks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

WalkAide

Intervention Type DEVICE

Arm 1 - Subjects wear WalkAide for 6 weeks then cross over to AFO wear for 6 weeks

AFO

Intervention Type DEVICE

Arm 2 - Subjects wear AFO for 6 weeks then cross over to WalkAide wear for 6 weeks

Ankle Foot Orthosis

Subjects wear AFO for 6 weeks then cross over to WalkAide wear for 6 weeks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

WalkAide

Intervention Type DEVICE

Arm 1 - Subjects wear WalkAide for 6 weeks then cross over to AFO wear for 6 weeks

AFO

Intervention Type DEVICE

Arm 2 - Subjects wear AFO for 6 weeks then cross over to WalkAide wear for 6 weeks

No Crossover

Subjects wear AFO for entire 12 weeks with no crossover

Group Type OTHER

AFO

Intervention Type DEVICE

Arm 3 - Subjects wear AFO for entire 12 weeks with no crossover

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

WalkAide

Arm 1 - Subjects wear WalkAide for 6 weeks then cross over to AFO wear for 6 weeks

Intervention Type DEVICE

AFO

Arm 2 - Subjects wear AFO for 6 weeks then cross over to WalkAide wear for 6 weeks

Intervention Type DEVICE

AFO

Arm 3 - Subjects wear AFO for entire 12 weeks with no crossover

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adults aged 18 years or older
2. Diagnosed with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within the last 365 days
3. Inadequate dorsiflexion during the swing phase of gait, resulting in inadequate limb clearance
4. Medically stable for six months prior to the most recent episode of stroke resulting in hemiplegia or hemiparesis with foot drop
5. Medical clearance by the attending physician to participate in the study
6. Expectation that current medication can be maintained without drastic change for at least six months
7. Adequate stability at the ankle during stance (with stimulation)
8. Adequate cognitive and communication function to give informed consent, understand the training instructions, use the device and give adequate feedback
9. Ability to ambulate with or without an assistive device (or assistance) at least 10 meters

Exclusion Criteria

1. Lower motor neuron injury with inadequate response to stimulation
2. History of falls greater than once a week prior to the CVA
3. Severe cardiac disease such as myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure or a demand pacemaker (or other electrical stimulator)
4. Fixed ankle contractures of five degrees of plantarflexion with knee extended
5. Moderate to normal ambulation velocity (greater than 1.2 m/s)
6. Unable to operate the device safely by self and caregiver assistance not available
7. Need for an AFO for stance control of the foot, ankle and/or knee
8. Comorbid conditions unlikely to survive one year
9. Pre-existing history of seizure disorder prior to most recent episode of CVA
10. Pre-existing pathology resulting in a significant disruption in alignment or function of the lower extremity
11. Morbid obesity that limits the subject's response to stimulation due to adipose tissue \[BMI \> 40\]
12. Excessive dysesthetic pain secondary to neurological involvement
13. Severe hypertonicity resulting in the need for more involved orthotic strategies or pharmacological interventions (e.g. Botox)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Innovative Neurotronics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael C Munin, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh, Department of PM&R

Sunil Hegde, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Huntington Rehabilitation Medicine Associates

Gerard Francisco, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Texas Institute of Rehabilitation Research

Richard Herman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Institute

Thy Huskey, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Neurology

Gary Abrams, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California; San Francisco VA Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

San Francisco VA Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Washington University

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh, Department of PM&R

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Texas Institute of Rehabilitation Research

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Everaert DG, Stein RB, Abrams GM, Dromerick AW, Francisco GE, Hafner BJ, Huskey TN, Munin MC, Nolan KJ, Kufta CV. Effect of a foot-drop stimulator and ankle-foot orthosis on walking performance after stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Sep;27(7):579-91. doi: 10.1177/1545968313481278. Epub 2013 Apr 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23558080 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

WalkAide Trials

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ankle Robotics After Stroke
NCT04594837 UNKNOWN NA