Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
121 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2005-09-30
2008-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
WalkAide Compared to Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) in Stroke Patients
NCT01087957
A Novel, Comprehensive Approach to Post-stroke Gait Rehabilitation
NCT04411303
Walk Assist Device to Improve Community Ambulation
NCT03222505
Clinical Effects of Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation (WalkAide[R]) for Chronic Stroke Patients
NCT02897752
Improving Propulsion of the Paretic Leg In Chronic Stroke
NCT04650802
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Reduced hip, knee and ankle excursions during swing are among the persistent gait abnormalities contributing to poor or inefficient limb clearance. This is generally referred to as "foot drop", since the foot drops or drags along the ground during the swing phase. Swing phase abnormalities can result in decreased velocity, limited endurance and an increased risk for falls. These factors can limit mobility and independence in the community. Therefore, intervention is warranted.
The conventional approach to address the poor swing limb function, specifically, insufficient ankle dorsiflexion, is the prescription of an ankle-foot orthosis (AFO). An AFO commonly limits ankle plantarflexion to enhance limb clearance during swing. An alternative approach is to stimulate the ankle dorsiflexors electrically during swing phase to reproduce motion, which can no longer be performed volitionally.
The WalkAide is a new foot drop stimulator. This small, self-contained device attaches to the leg below the knee. The WalkAide contains a number of patented features, including a tilt sensor that measures the orientation of the leg with respect to the vertical. When the leg is tilted back at the end of stance, stimulation of the common peroneal nerve is initiated. This produces flexion of the ankle and other joints (if a flexion reflex is elicited) so that the leg can clear the ground during swing. When the leg is tilted forward at the end of swing phase, the stimulus is terminated. The electrodes attach to the inside of a cuff that is molded to the leg for reproducible positioning from day to day. The device is also designed so that all operations can be done with a single hand, since hemiparesis may prevent the subject from using the other hand. Because of its enhanced features, the WalkAide is anticipated to increase walking speed and improve the quality of life.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
WalkAide
Subjects wear WalkAide for 6 weeks then cross over to AFO wear for 6 weeks
WalkAide
Arm 1 - Subjects wear WalkAide for 6 weeks then cross over to AFO wear for 6 weeks
AFO
Arm 2 - Subjects wear AFO for 6 weeks then cross over to WalkAide wear for 6 weeks
Ankle Foot Orthosis
Subjects wear AFO for 6 weeks then cross over to WalkAide wear for 6 weeks
WalkAide
Arm 1 - Subjects wear WalkAide for 6 weeks then cross over to AFO wear for 6 weeks
AFO
Arm 2 - Subjects wear AFO for 6 weeks then cross over to WalkAide wear for 6 weeks
No Crossover
Subjects wear AFO for entire 12 weeks with no crossover
AFO
Arm 3 - Subjects wear AFO for entire 12 weeks with no crossover
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
WalkAide
Arm 1 - Subjects wear WalkAide for 6 weeks then cross over to AFO wear for 6 weeks
AFO
Arm 2 - Subjects wear AFO for 6 weeks then cross over to WalkAide wear for 6 weeks
AFO
Arm 3 - Subjects wear AFO for entire 12 weeks with no crossover
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosed with cerebrovascular accident (CVA) within the last 365 days
3. Inadequate dorsiflexion during the swing phase of gait, resulting in inadequate limb clearance
4. Medically stable for six months prior to the most recent episode of stroke resulting in hemiplegia or hemiparesis with foot drop
5. Medical clearance by the attending physician to participate in the study
6. Expectation that current medication can be maintained without drastic change for at least six months
7. Adequate stability at the ankle during stance (with stimulation)
8. Adequate cognitive and communication function to give informed consent, understand the training instructions, use the device and give adequate feedback
9. Ability to ambulate with or without an assistive device (or assistance) at least 10 meters
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of falls greater than once a week prior to the CVA
3. Severe cardiac disease such as myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure or a demand pacemaker (or other electrical stimulator)
4. Fixed ankle contractures of five degrees of plantarflexion with knee extended
5. Moderate to normal ambulation velocity (greater than 1.2 m/s)
6. Unable to operate the device safely by self and caregiver assistance not available
7. Need for an AFO for stance control of the foot, ankle and/or knee
8. Comorbid conditions unlikely to survive one year
9. Pre-existing history of seizure disorder prior to most recent episode of CVA
10. Pre-existing pathology resulting in a significant disruption in alignment or function of the lower extremity
11. Morbid obesity that limits the subject's response to stimulation due to adipose tissue \[BMI \> 40\]
12. Excessive dysesthetic pain secondary to neurological involvement
13. Severe hypertonicity resulting in the need for more involved orthotic strategies or pharmacological interventions (e.g. Botox)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Innovative Neurotronics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael C Munin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Pittsburgh, Department of PM&R
Sunil Hegde, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Huntington Rehabilitation Medicine Associates
Gerard Francisco, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Texas Institute of Rehabilitation Research
Richard Herman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Good Samaritan Rehabilitation Institute
Thy Huskey, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University in St. Louis, Department of Neurology
Gary Abrams, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California; San Francisco VA Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
San Francisco VA Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States
Washington University
St Louis, Missouri, United States
University of Pittsburgh, Department of PM&R
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
Texas Institute of Rehabilitation Research
Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Everaert DG, Stein RB, Abrams GM, Dromerick AW, Francisco GE, Hafner BJ, Huskey TN, Munin MC, Nolan KJ, Kufta CV. Effect of a foot-drop stimulator and ankle-foot orthosis on walking performance after stroke: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013 Sep;27(7):579-91. doi: 10.1177/1545968313481278. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
WalkAide Trials
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.