WalkAide Compared to Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) in Stroke Patients
NCT ID: NCT01087957
Last Updated: 2014-05-13
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
495 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-03-31
2013-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of the WalkAide and AFOs for CVA
NCT00216320
Ankle Robot to Reduce Foot Drop in Stroke
NCT02483676
Clinical Effects of Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation (WalkAide[R]) for Chronic Stroke Patients
NCT02897752
The Effects of Gait Rehabilitation After Stroke by Treadmill-based Robotics Versus Traditional Gait Training
NCT03688165
The General Use of Robots in Stroke Recovery: the Anklebot
NCT02249832
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
Comparison of WalkAide device against Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
Comparison of WalkAide device against Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
WalkAide
Comparison of WalkAide device against Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
WalkAide
Comparison of WalkAide device against Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
WalkAide
Comparison of WalkAide device against Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
Comparison of WalkAide device against Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient is at least 6 months post stroke.
* Patient has hemiplegia/hemiparesis.
* Patient has inadequate dorsiflexion during swing phase of gait, resulting in inadequate limb clearance.
* Patient is not currently using Functional Electrical Stimulation for the treatment of footdrop.
* Patient is a minimum of 30 days post inpatient or outpatient stroke, cardiac, pulmonary, or physical rehabilitation on the lower extremity.
* Patient is a minimum of 90 days post major orthopedic surgery (i.e. hip, knee, and/or ankle joint replacement).
* Patient is a minimum of 90 days post myocardial infarction.
* Patient is a minimum of 90 days post stenting procedure (i.e. peripheral, cardiac, carotid, and/or renal).
* Patient is a minimum of 6 months post CABG or cardiac valve procedure.
* Patient is able to walk at least 10 meters with or without an assist device (excluding an AFO or WalkAide device).
* Patient has an initial gait speed \> 0.0 m/s and \< 0.8 m/s.
* Patient has a positive response to peroneal nerve stimulation testing, resulting adequate dorsiflexion of the ankle.
* Patient has adequate cognitive function to permit reliable completion of evaluation instruments and to correctly use the therapeutic interventions as determined by a Mini-Mental Status test score \>17 within 30 days prior to enrollment.
* Patient has completed a full neurological assessment within 30 days prior to enrollment.
* Patient is eligible for Medicare or Medicare Choice/Advantage benefits at the time of enrollment
* Patient is able and willing to comply with study procedures, including follow-up requirements.
* Patient is able and willing to give written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient has inadequate cognitive function to permit reliable completion of evaluation instruments and to correctly use the therapeutic interventions as determined by a Mini-Mental Status test score \< 17 within 30 days prior to enrollment.
* Patient has ankle joint instability other than foot drop.
* Patient is less than 30 days post inpatient or outpatient: stroke, cardiac, pulmonary, or any type of physical rehabilitation on the lower extremity at time of enrollment.
* Patient has need for an AFO for stance control of the foot, ankle and/or knee.
* Patient has an initial gait speed of 0.8 m/s or greater classified as a full community walker (independent in all home and community activities).
* Patient is not able to safely clear toes in swing phase on the involved lower extremity, defined as \>-5° plantar flexion, with the device determined at fitting visit.
* Patient has been diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy and symptoms obstruct or limit ambulation or participation in study procedures.
* Patient has been diagnosed with significant peripheral vascular disease accompanied by lower extremity ulceration and/or disabling claudication.
* Patient has underlying condition(s) that would limit study participation such as severe hypertonicity resulting in the need for more involved orthotic strategies or excessive dysesthetic pain secondary to neurological involvement.
* Patient has moderate to very severe COPD, as defined by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD).
* Patient is NYHA Class III or IV.
* Patient has malignant skin lesion below the knee on the affected lower extremity.
* Patient has history of seizure disorder and on seizure medications.
* Patient has aphasia, defined as incapacity to verbalize commands.
* Patient has Beck Depression Index score of \> 29 indicating severe depression.
* Patient has a life expectancy less than 12 months.
* Patient has existing electrical stimulation devices (ICD, Pacemaker, Spinal Stimulation, TENS).
* Patient is less than 6 months free from Botulinum Toxin (Botox) injection in the lower extremity.
* Patient has baclofen pump with unstable dosing in the last 3 months.
* Patient is unable or unwilling to comply with study procedures, including follow-up requirements.
* Patient is participating in another clinical trial that, according to the Principal Investigator, is likely to affect study outcome or confound results.
* Patient is unable or unwilling to give written informed consent.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Innovative Neurotronics
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Francois Bethoux, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The Cleveland Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Loma Linda University Medical Center
Loma Linda, California, United States
The Los Angeles VA
Los Angeles, California, United States
Casa Colina Centers for Rehabilitation
Pomona, California, United States
The San Francisco VA Medical Center
San Francisco, California, United States
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Halifax Hospital
Daytona Beach, Florida, United States
Florida Hospital NORI
Orlando, Florida, United States
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
University of Illinois at Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Marianjoy Rehabilitation
Wheaton, Illinois, United States
Cardinal Hill Rehabilitation
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
St. Mary's of Michigan
Saginaw, Michigan, United States
University of Minnesota Twin-Cities
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Kessler Foundation Research Center
West Orange, New Jersey, United States
United Healthcare
Johnson City, New York, United States
South Shore Neurologic Associates
Patchogue, New York, United States
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Syracuse, New York, United States
Health Research Inc./Helen Hayes Hospital
West Haverstraw, New York, United States
Guilford Neurologic Associates
Greensboro, North Carolina, United States
FirstHealth of the Carolinas
Pinehurst, North Carolina, United States
The Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
The Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Magee Rehabilitation Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
St. David's Rehabilitation Hospital
Austin, Texas, United States
The Dallas VA
Dallas, Texas, United States
Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation
Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bethoux F, Rogers HL, Nolan KJ, Abrams GM, Annaswamy TM, Brandstater M, Browne B, Burnfield JM, Feng W, Freed MJ, Geis C, Greenberg J, Gudesblatt M, Ikramuddin F, Jayaraman A, Kautz SA, Lutsep HL, Madhavan S, Meilahn J, Pease WS, Rao N, Seetharama S, Sethi P, Turk MA, Wallis RA, Kufta C. The effects of peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation versus ankle-foot orthosis in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):688-97. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521007. Epub 2014 Feb 13.
Bethoux F, Rogers HL, Nolan KJ, Abrams GM, Annaswamy T, Brandstater M, Browne B, Burnfield JM, Feng W, Freed MJ, Geis C, Greenberg J, Gudesblatt M, Ikramuddin F, Jayaraman A, Kautz SA, Lutsep HL, Madhavan S, Meilahn J, Pease WS, Rao N, Seetharama S, Sethi P, Turk MA, Wallis RA, Kufta C. Long-Term Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation to an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Patients With Chronic Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(10):911-22. doi: 10.1177/1545968315570325. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
INSTRIDE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.