WalkAide Compared to Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) in Stroke Patients

NCT ID: NCT01087957

Last Updated: 2014-05-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

495 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-03-31

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To establish equivalence or incremental benefit to standard of care Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO) for patients with foot drop due to stroke, and to assess the functional improvement of ambulation and improved activities of daily living.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a pivotal un-blinded, randomized, controlled trial with parallel group therapeutic intervention versus control of standard of care (AFO).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Comparison of WalkAide device against Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Intervention Type OTHER

Comparison of WalkAide device against Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

WalkAide

Comparison of WalkAide device against Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

WalkAide

Intervention Type DEVICE

Comparison of WalkAide device against Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

WalkAide

Comparison of WalkAide device against Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Comparison of WalkAide device against Ankle-Foot Orthosis (AFO)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient history of stroke (ischemic and/or hemorrhagic).
* Patient is at least 6 months post stroke.
* Patient has hemiplegia/hemiparesis.
* Patient has inadequate dorsiflexion during swing phase of gait, resulting in inadequate limb clearance.
* Patient is not currently using Functional Electrical Stimulation for the treatment of footdrop.
* Patient is a minimum of 30 days post inpatient or outpatient stroke, cardiac, pulmonary, or physical rehabilitation on the lower extremity.
* Patient is a minimum of 90 days post major orthopedic surgery (i.e. hip, knee, and/or ankle joint replacement).
* Patient is a minimum of 90 days post myocardial infarction.
* Patient is a minimum of 90 days post stenting procedure (i.e. peripheral, cardiac, carotid, and/or renal).
* Patient is a minimum of 6 months post CABG or cardiac valve procedure.
* Patient is able to walk at least 10 meters with or without an assist device (excluding an AFO or WalkAide device).
* Patient has an initial gait speed \> 0.0 m/s and \< 0.8 m/s.
* Patient has a positive response to peroneal nerve stimulation testing, resulting adequate dorsiflexion of the ankle.
* Patient has adequate cognitive function to permit reliable completion of evaluation instruments and to correctly use the therapeutic interventions as determined by a Mini-Mental Status test score \>17 within 30 days prior to enrollment.
* Patient has completed a full neurological assessment within 30 days prior to enrollment.
* Patient is eligible for Medicare or Medicare Choice/Advantage benefits at the time of enrollment
* Patient is able and willing to comply with study procedures, including follow-up requirements.
* Patient is able and willing to give written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient is less than 6-months post stroke.
* Patient has inadequate cognitive function to permit reliable completion of evaluation instruments and to correctly use the therapeutic interventions as determined by a Mini-Mental Status test score \< 17 within 30 days prior to enrollment.
* Patient has ankle joint instability other than foot drop.
* Patient is less than 30 days post inpatient or outpatient: stroke, cardiac, pulmonary, or any type of physical rehabilitation on the lower extremity at time of enrollment.
* Patient has need for an AFO for stance control of the foot, ankle and/or knee.
* Patient has an initial gait speed of 0.8 m/s or greater classified as a full community walker (independent in all home and community activities).
* Patient is not able to safely clear toes in swing phase on the involved lower extremity, defined as \>-5° plantar flexion, with the device determined at fitting visit.
* Patient has been diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy and symptoms obstruct or limit ambulation or participation in study procedures.
* Patient has been diagnosed with significant peripheral vascular disease accompanied by lower extremity ulceration and/or disabling claudication.
* Patient has underlying condition(s) that would limit study participation such as severe hypertonicity resulting in the need for more involved orthotic strategies or excessive dysesthetic pain secondary to neurological involvement.
* Patient has moderate to very severe COPD, as defined by the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD).
* Patient is NYHA Class III or IV.
* Patient has malignant skin lesion below the knee on the affected lower extremity.
* Patient has history of seizure disorder and on seizure medications.
* Patient has aphasia, defined as incapacity to verbalize commands.
* Patient has Beck Depression Index score of \> 29 indicating severe depression.
* Patient has a life expectancy less than 12 months.
* Patient has existing electrical stimulation devices (ICD, Pacemaker, Spinal Stimulation, TENS).
* Patient is less than 6 months free from Botulinum Toxin (Botox) injection in the lower extremity.
* Patient has baclofen pump with unstable dosing in the last 3 months.
* Patient is unable or unwilling to comply with study procedures, including follow-up requirements.
* Patient is participating in another clinical trial that, according to the Principal Investigator, is likely to affect study outcome or confound results.
* Patient is unable or unwilling to give written informed consent.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Innovative Neurotronics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Francois Bethoux, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

The Cleveland Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Loma Linda University Medical Center

Loma Linda, California, United States

Site Status

The Los Angeles VA

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Casa Colina Centers for Rehabilitation

Pomona, California, United States

Site Status

The San Francisco VA Medical Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Hartford Hospital

Hartford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Halifax Hospital

Daytona Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Florida Hospital NORI

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

University of Illinois at Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Marianjoy Rehabilitation

Wheaton, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Cardinal Hill Rehabilitation

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

St. Mary's of Michigan

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

University of Minnesota Twin-Cities

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Madonna Rehabilitation Hospital

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Kessler Foundation Research Center

West Orange, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

United Healthcare

Johnson City, New York, United States

Site Status

South Shore Neurologic Associates

Patchogue, New York, United States

Site Status

SUNY Upstate Medical University

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Health Research Inc./Helen Hayes Hospital

West Haverstraw, New York, United States

Site Status

Guilford Neurologic Associates

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

FirstHealth of the Carolinas

Pinehurst, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

The Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

The Ohio State University Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oregon Health & Science University

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Magee Rehabilitation Hospital

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

St. David's Rehabilitation Hospital

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

The Dallas VA

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Marshfield Clinic Research Foundation

Marshfield, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bethoux F, Rogers HL, Nolan KJ, Abrams GM, Annaswamy TM, Brandstater M, Browne B, Burnfield JM, Feng W, Freed MJ, Geis C, Greenberg J, Gudesblatt M, Ikramuddin F, Jayaraman A, Kautz SA, Lutsep HL, Madhavan S, Meilahn J, Pease WS, Rao N, Seetharama S, Sethi P, Turk MA, Wallis RA, Kufta C. The effects of peroneal nerve functional electrical stimulation versus ankle-foot orthosis in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 Sep;28(7):688-97. doi: 10.1177/1545968314521007. Epub 2014 Feb 13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24526708 (View on PubMed)

Bethoux F, Rogers HL, Nolan KJ, Abrams GM, Annaswamy T, Brandstater M, Browne B, Burnfield JM, Feng W, Freed MJ, Geis C, Greenberg J, Gudesblatt M, Ikramuddin F, Jayaraman A, Kautz SA, Lutsep HL, Madhavan S, Meilahn J, Pease WS, Rao N, Seetharama S, Sethi P, Turk MA, Wallis RA, Kufta C. Long-Term Follow-up to a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Peroneal Nerve Functional Electrical Stimulation to an Ankle Foot Orthosis for Patients With Chronic Stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(10):911-22. doi: 10.1177/1545968315570325. Epub 2015 Feb 4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 25653225 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

INSTRIDE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ankle Exoskeleton for Stroke Gait Enhancement
NCT07179627 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Ankle Robotics After Stroke
NCT04594837 UNKNOWN NA
Gait Recovery After Stroke
NCT06806748 NOT_YET_RECRUITING