Correlation of Nasal Volume, Cross-Sectional Area With Nasalance Scores Measured by Acoustic Rhinometry and Nasometry
NCT ID: NCT00147940
Last Updated: 2013-06-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2004-04-30
2005-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Acoustic rhinometry is a means to study the volume and cross-sectional areas of the nasal cavity in a non-invasive, rapid, convenient and reliable manner. Acoustic rhinometry has the unique advantage of being completely non-invasive, and thus is able to measure nasal patency without the confounding effects of probes or invasive monitoring.
Nasometry is a technique to measure the oral and nasal components of nasalance. Nasalance is the objective measure of the nasal component of speech that is determined by the ratio of sound pressure emitted from the nasal and oral cavities during speech. Nasality is the term used to characterize the nasal component of speech, and is a subjective measure.
Eleven healthy subjects underwent acoustic rhinometry pre and post decongestion using oxymetazoline 0.05% nasal spray. Nasalance scores were based on the readings of three passages: rainbow, zoo, and nasal.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Changes in Nasal Patency With Changes in Posture, Temperature, Humidity and Nasal Patency Seen by Acoustic Rhinometry
NCT00147888
Blown Nasal Secretion Measurements in Rhinosinusitis: Repeatability and Validity Compared to Nasal Lavage
NCT00292851
An Observational Study to Evaluate The Relationship of Nasal Mucus Properties and Symptoms
NCT01553110
Exploratory Subjective Sleep Study of a Prototype Nasal Dilator
NCT01122849
Traditional vs. Posterior Nasal Radiofrequency Ablation for Chronic Rhinitis
NCT07323888
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Nasometry is a technique to measure the oral and nasal components of nasalance. Nasalance is an objective measure of the nasal component of speech that is determined by the ratio of acoustic pressures emitted from the nasal and oral cavities. 'Nasality' is the term used to characterize the nasal component of speech, and is a subjective measure.
The Nasometer (Kay Elemetrics Corp Lincoln Park, NJ) is a computer-based device that analyzes acoustic energy that is emitted from the oral and the nasal cavity during speech. It consists of two microphones that are separated by a plate. The upper microphone measures nasally emitted acoustic energy, and the lower microphone measure the acoustic energy emitted from the oral cavity.
Nasalance is an important measure in speech pathology. In situations where velopharyngeal competence is in question, nasometry objectively documents the nasal component of speech as normal, hypemasal or hyponasal. It has been found to be of tremendous benefit in the management of patients with cleft palate and velopharyngeal incompetence. The subject is relaxed, and is fitted with a headgear apparatus. This apparatus is placed such that a plate lies in a horizontal plane that rests midway between the nose and the mouth. There are microphones on the upper and lower surfaces of the plate that capture sound energy produced from the nasal and oral cavities respectively. The subject is then asked to read standard passages. The three most commonly used passages are described here, and will be used in our study. The 'Rainbow' passage is most representative of standard English speech. The 'Zoo' passage has no nasal consonants, and the 'Nasal' passage has the highest number of nasal consonants.
While the subject is reading, the microphone captures sound pressure levels which are emitted from the nasal and the oral cavities. This data is analyzed by the attached computer and presented graphically. The computer also provides a nasalance score for each of three above- mentioned passages. Normative data is available for each of these passages for adults and children. By comparing the data obtained from the subject with the normative means and standard deviations, the investigator can categorize the subject's voice as normal, hyponasal or hypernasal. The nasalance score that is generated can also be used to monitor the efficacy of speech therapy and surgical interventions.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Acoustic rhinometry (procedure)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects younger than 18 years
* Allergy to the drug oxymetazoline
* Inability to read a simple standard English passage
* History of heart disease, hypertension, renal, liver or lung disease
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Chicago
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel Martin, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Chicago
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Moinuddin R, Mamikoglu B, Barkatullah S, Corey JP. Detection of the nasal cycle. Am J Rhinol. 2001 Jan-Feb;15(1):35-9. doi: 10.2500/105065801781329473.
Corey JP, Houser SM, Ng BA. Nasal congestion: a review of its etiology, evaluation, and treatment. Ear Nose Throat J. 2000 Sep;79(9):690-3, 696, 698 passim.
Corey JP, Nalbone VP, Ng BA. Anatomic correlates of acoustic rhinometry as measured by rigid nasal endoscopy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Nov;121(5):572-6. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70058-6.
Mamikoglu B, Houser S, Akbar I, Ng B, Corey JP. Acoustic rhinometry and computed tomography scans for the diagnosis of nasal septal deviation, with clinical correlation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Jul;123(1 Pt 1):61-8. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.105255.
Corey JP, Gungor A, Nelson R, Fredberg J, Lai V. A comparison of the nasal cross-sectional areas and volumes obtained with acoustic rhinometry and magnetic resonance imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1997 Oct;117(4):349-54. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(97)70125-6.
Seaver EJ, Dalston RM, Leeper HA, Adams LE. A study of nasometric values for normal nasal resonance. J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Aug;34(4):715-21. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3404.715.
Williams RG, Eccles R, Hutchings H. The relationship between nasalance and nasal resistance to airflow. Acta Otolaryngol. 1990 Nov-Dec;110(5-6):443-9. doi: 10.3109/00016489009107467.
Mayo R, Floyd LA, Warren DW, Dalston RM, Mayo CM. Nasalance and nasal area values: cross-racial study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 Mar;33(2):143-9. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569_1996_033_0143_nanavc_2.3.co_2.
Dalston RM, Warren DW, Dalston ET. A preliminary investigation concerning the use of nasometry in identifying patients with hyponasality and/or nasal airway impairment. J Speech Hear Res. 1991 Feb;34(1):11-8. doi: 10.1044/jshr.3401.11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13093A
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.