Study on the Optimization of the Diagnostic Process for Chronic Rhinitis Using Nasal Allergen Provocation Test
NCT ID: NCT06999044
Last Updated: 2025-05-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-03-24
2028-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Clinically, CR is broadly classified into allergic rhinitis (AR) and non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) based on skin prick test (SPT) and/or serum-specific IgE results. However, real-world clinical complexity arises as a subset of patients exhibit AR symptoms despite negative test results (local allergic rhinitis), while others with confirmed AR evade detection via conventional methods. This challenges the traditional dichotomous classification, highlighting its growing inadequacy. Given divergent therapeutic strategies for CR subtypes, ambiguous classification frequently leads to ineffective clinical outcomes, necessitating a gold-standard diagnostic framework for precise phenotyping.
The nasal allergen provocation test (NAPT), internationally recognized as the diagnostic gold standard for AR and local allergic rhinitis, directly applies allergens to nasal mucosa to elicit or exacerbate symptoms. Endorsed by global guidelines (e.g., ARIA, EPOS), NAPT has demonstrated safety through over a decade of clinical refinement. Despite its advantages, current protocols involve multi-dose allergen challenges at varying concentrations, rendering the procedure time-prohibitive and limiting clinical adoption. Developing a simplified, standardized provocation method is an urgent unmet need to expedite practical application.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Epidemiological and Intrinsic Characteristics of Chronic Rhinitis
NCT06370468
Diagnostic Efficacy of CDA Nasal Provocation Test in Patients With IR
NCT06682676
Characteristic Transcriptomic, Proteomic and Metabolomic Molecular Studies of Nasal Secretions From Chronic Rhinitis
NCT06678334
Establishment of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment System for Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis
NCT05390255
Impact of Structural and Microenvironmental Abnormalities in Olfactory Cleft on Olfaction in CRS
NCT06834477
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
chronic rhinitis
The examination room temperature was maintained at 20-22°C, with patients acclimatizing to the testing environment for 15-30 minutes prior to evaluation. Baseline assessments included 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR) and subjective symptom evaluation using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and total nasal symptom scores (TNSS). A reagent devoid of dust mite allergen was applied to the mucosa above the inferior nasal turbinate (middle meatus side) or the medial surface. After a 15-minute observation period, the test was terminated if a positive reaction occurred.
If no positive reaction was observed, formal graded-concentration testing commenced. Starting with the predefined lowest concentration, patients were monitored for 15 minutes. A positive reaction prompted immediate termination of the test, followed by nasal secretion collection, reassessment of subjective/objective parameters, data recording, and administration of sychallenge protocols and ARIA guideline criteria for symptom scoring.
No interventions assigned to this group
Healthy Volunteers
The examination room temperature was maintained at 20-22°C, with patients acclimatizing to the testing environment for 15-30 minutes prior to evaluation. Baseline assessments included 4-phase rhinomanometry (4PR) and subjective symptom evaluation using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and total nasal symptom scores (TNSS). A reagent devoid of dust mite allergen was applied to the mucosa above the inferior nasal turbinate (middle meatus side) or the medial surface. After a 15-minute observation period, the test was terminated if a positive reaction occurred.
If no positive reaction was observed, formal graded-concentration testing commenced. Starting with the predefined lowest concentration, patients were monitored for 15 minutes. A positive reaction prompted immediate termination of the test, followed by nasal secretion collection, reassessment of subjective/objective parameters, data recording, and administration of symptomatic relief medication. Absence of reactivity triggered progres
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aged 18-75 years;
* patients who visited the Department of Otorhinolaryngology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical Uncversity and were willing to undergo nasal provocation test; 3.Ptients who are willing to provide specimens for free to promote the study of the diagnostic efficacy of nasal provocation.
Healthy volunteers:
* Aged 18-75 years;
* Did not have any nasal symptoms and tested negative for allergens
Exclusion Criteria
* History of severe allergic reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis).
* Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or severe cardiopulmonary diseases contraindicating epinephrine use.
* Active phase of other severe systemic diseases (e.g., malignancies, autoimmune diseases).
* Within 1 week post-vaccination.
* Pregnancy, lactation, or preconception period.
* Inability to comply with study procedures (particularly children under 5 years old).
* Recent nasal surgery (within 2 months), nasal deformities (e.g., choanal atresia, severe nasal septum deviation/perforation), dry/atrophic rhinitis, severe nasal obstruction (e.g., hypertrophic rhinitis, rhinitis medicamentosa), or uncontrolled epistaxis.
* Current use of anti-allergy medications, including:Intranasal agents: corticosteroids, antihistamines, decongestants, anticholinergics, sodium cromoglicate;Systemic agents: oral antihistamines, oral/injectable corticosteroids.
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lei Cheng, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Ye Yuan, MBBS
Role: CONTACT
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Ye Yuan, MBBS
Role: backup
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2024-SR-1114
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.