Comparing Ciprofloxacin (CPFX) With Cefepime (CFPM) in Febrile Neutropenic Patients With Hematologic Diseases

NCT ID: NCT00137787

Last Updated: 2018-06-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

51 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2005-04-30

Study Completion Date

2010-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to investigate whether intravenous ciprofloxacin is as effective as cefepime for the initial treatment of febrile neutropenia developed in patients with hematologic diseases.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Infectious complications during neutropenic periods are major causes of morbidity and mortality especially for patients with hematological diseases, and prompt initiation of antibiotic therapy is warranted for those who develop febrile neutropenia. As for initial therapeutic agents, beta-lactam antibiotics, i.e., third- or fourth-generation cephalosporins and carbapenems have been used frequently because of their strong and broad-spectrum of action. However, under these conditions, development of resistance mediated by a beta-lactamase is concerned, and there is a need for alternative non-beta-lactam antibiotics for this indication. Ciprofloxacin is a potent agent covering against wide range of strains including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and expected as a potential candidate. We have therefore planned a prospective randomized controlled trial designed to compare intravenous ciprofloxacin with cefepime for febrile neutropenic patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Febrile Neutropenia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ciprofloxacin

Intervention Type DRUG

2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

cefepime

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ciprofloxacin

Intervention Type DRUG

cefepime

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Hematologic disease
* Ages between 15 and 79 years
* Axillary temperature of 38.0 C or greater on one occasion or of 37.5 to 37.9 C lasting for more than 1 hour
* Absolute neutrophil count of less than 500/microL
* T-Bil level less than 2.0 times the upper limit of normal
* Cre level less than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal
* Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Past history of allergic reaction to the study drug
* Positive for HIV antibody
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Family history of auditory disturbance
* Having received systemic antibacterial therapy within 14 days
* Receiving systemic antifungal or antiviral therapy except fluconazole or acyclovir for cases undergoing transplantation
* No recovery of neutrophil count of 1,000/microL or higher from the previous febrile episode
* On treatment with ketoprofen
* On treatment with sodium valproate
* Septic shock
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bayer

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Center for Supporting Hematology-Oncology Trials

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yoshiko Atsuta, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Nagoya University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine

Nagoya, , Japan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Japan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yasuda T, Suzuki R, Ishikawa Y, Terakura S, Inamoto Y, Yanada M, Nagai H, Ozawa Y, Ozeki K, Atsuta Y, Emi N, Naoe T. Randomized controlled trial comparing ciprofloxacin and cefepime in febrile neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. Int J Infect Dis. 2013 Jun;17(6):e385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2012.12.005. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23317527 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

C-SHOT 0402

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.