Safety and Efficacy Study of Ceftaroline Versus a Comparator in Pediatric Subjects With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP)

NCT ID: NCT01530763

Last Updated: 2015-01-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Total Enrollment

161 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-30

Study Completion Date

2014-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a study of safety and effectiveness of ceftaroline fosamil in children with Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia receiving antibiotic therapy in the hospital.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To evaluate safety, effectiveness, pharmacokinetics and tolerance of ceftaroline fosamil in children who are initially hospitalized with Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infections Community Acquired Pneumonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ceftaroline fosamil

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ceftaroline fosamil

Intervention Type DRUG

Treatment Group 1:

Drug: Ceftaroline fosamil Children ≥ 6 months: IV ceftaroline fosamil 12 mg/kg for subjects weighing ≤ 33 kg or 400 mg for subjects weighing \> 33 kg will be infused over 60 (± 10) minutes every 8 hours (q8h) (± 1 hour)

Children \< 6 months: Ceftaroline fosamil 8 mg/kg over 60 (± 10) minutes q8h (± 1 hour)

amoxicillin clavulanate

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral Switch for Treatment Groups 1 and 2:

PO amoxicillin clavulanate 90 mg/kg/day divided q12h in subjects with infections due to susceptible organisms on or after Study Day 4 (a minimum of 7 IV doses required if randomized to ceftaroline.)

Ceftriaxone

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ceftriaxone

Intervention Type DRUG

Treatment group 2:

75 mg/kg/day up to 4 g/day IV in equally divided doses, each infused over 30 (± 10) minutes q12hr (± 2 hours)

amoxicillin clavulanate

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral Switch for Treatment Groups 1 and 2:

PO amoxicillin clavulanate 90 mg/kg/day divided q12h in subjects with infections due to susceptible organisms on or after Study Day 4 (a minimum of 7 IV doses required if randomized to ceftaroline.)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ceftaroline fosamil

Treatment Group 1:

Drug: Ceftaroline fosamil Children ≥ 6 months: IV ceftaroline fosamil 12 mg/kg for subjects weighing ≤ 33 kg or 400 mg for subjects weighing \> 33 kg will be infused over 60 (± 10) minutes every 8 hours (q8h) (± 1 hour)

Children \< 6 months: Ceftaroline fosamil 8 mg/kg over 60 (± 10) minutes q8h (± 1 hour)

Intervention Type DRUG

Ceftriaxone

Treatment group 2:

75 mg/kg/day up to 4 g/day IV in equally divided doses, each infused over 30 (± 10) minutes q12hr (± 2 hours)

Intervention Type DRUG

amoxicillin clavulanate

Oral Switch for Treatment Groups 1 and 2:

PO amoxicillin clavulanate 90 mg/kg/day divided q12h in subjects with infections due to susceptible organisms on or after Study Day 4 (a minimum of 7 IV doses required if randomized to ceftaroline.)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Teflaro PPI-0903 TAK-599 TAK599 PPI0903

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female, 2 months to \< 18 years old.
* Presence of CABP requiring hospitalization and IV antibacterial therapy

Exclusion Criteria

* Documented history of any hypersensitivity of allergic reaction to any β-lactam antimicrobial.
* Confirmed or suspected infection with a pathogen known to be resistant to ceftriaxone.
* Confirmed or suspected respiratory tract infection attributed to sources other than CABP pathogens.
* Non-infectious causes of pulmonary infiltrates.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Forest Laboratories

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Investigational Site

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Oakland, California, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Orange, California, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Syracuse, New York, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Toledo, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Pittsuburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Morgantown, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Capital Federal, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Investigational Site

Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina

Site Status

Investigational Site

Plovdiv, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Investigational Site

Rousse, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Investigational Site2

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Investigational Site

Sofia, , Bulgaria

Site Status

Investigational Site2

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Investigational Site3

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Investigational Site

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Investigational Site

Athens, Attica, Greece

Site Status

Investigational Site

Heraklion, Crete, Greece

Site Status

Investigational Site

Thessaloniki, Macedonia, Greece

Site Status

Investigational Site

Larissa, Thessaly, Greece

Site Status

Investigational Site

Gyula, Bekes County, Hungary

Site Status

Investigational Site

Ajka, , Hungary

Site Status

Investigational Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Investigational Site

Nagykanisza, , Hungary

Site Status

Investigational Site

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Investigational Site

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Investigational Site

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

Investigational Site

Zalaegerszeg, , Hungary

Site Status

Investigational Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Rzeszów, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Córdoba, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Investigational Site

Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Investigational Site

Kryvyi Rih, , Ukraine

Site Status

Investigational Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Investigational Site

Zaporizhia, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Bulgaria Georgia Greece Hungary Poland Spain Ukraine

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cannavino CR, Nemeth A, Korczowski B, Bradley JS, O'Neal T, Jandourek A, Friedland HD, Kaplan SL. A Randomized, Prospective Study of Pediatric Patients With Community-acquired Pneumonia Treated With Ceftaroline Versus Ceftriaxone. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Jul;35(7):752-9. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001159.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27093162 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.cerexa.com

sponsor website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P903-31

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.