Evaluation of Ceftaroline Fosamil Versus a Comparator in Adult Subjects With Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) With Risk for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus

NCT ID: NCT01645735

Last Updated: 2016-02-01

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether ceftaroline is effective and safe for the treatment of patients with Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP) at risk for infection due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A Multicenter, Multinational, Randomized, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and safety of Ceftaroline fosamil Versus Ceftriaxone Plus Vancomycin in Adult Subjects with Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia at Risk for Infection Due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ceftaroline

Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg Intravenous (IV) administration over 60 minutes, every 8 hours (q8h); dosing to be adjusted for renal function; treatment duration 5 to 14 days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ceftaroline fosamil

Intervention Type DRUG

Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg IV over 60 minutes q8h; treatment duration 5 to 14 days

Ceftriaxone plus vancomycin

Ceftriaxone 2 g IV over 30 minutes once per day (q24h) plus vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV every 12 hours (q12h) initially and then dose adjusted based on trough concentrations; treatment duration 5 to 14 days

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ceftriaxone plus vancomycin

Intervention Type DRUG

Ceftriaxone 2g IV over 30 minutes q24h plus vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV q12h initially and then dose adjusted based on trough concentrations; treatment duration 5 to 14 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ceftaroline fosamil

Ceftaroline fosamil 600 mg IV over 60 minutes q8h; treatment duration 5 to 14 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Ceftriaxone plus vancomycin

Ceftriaxone 2g IV over 30 minutes q24h plus vancomycin 15 mg/kg IV q12h initially and then dose adjusted based on trough concentrations; treatment duration 5 to 14 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Teflaro PPI-0903 TAK-599 TAK599 PPI0903 Teflaro

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male or female, ≥ 18 years old
2. Presence of CABP requiring hospitalization
3. Presence of CABP meeting the following criteria:

I. confirmed pneumonia (new or progressive pulmonary) II. Acute illness (≤ 7 days' duration) with at least 3 clinical signs or symptoms consistent with a lower respiratory tract infection

MRSA Risk Factors

• MRSA-positive blood culture or respiratory specimen or a risk factor for MRSA such as a history of colonization with MRSA

Exclusion Criteria

1. History of any hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any β-lactam antimicrobial
2. Suspected or microbiologically-documented infection with a pathogen known to be resistant to any of the study drugs
3. Non-infectious causes of pulmonary infiltrates (eg, pulmonary embolism, chemical pneumonitis from aspiration, hypersensitivity pneumonia, congestive heart failure)
4. More than 24 hours of potentially effective systemic antibacterial therapy for CABP within 96 hours before randomization
5. End-stage renal disease \[Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) \< 15\], including hemodialysis
6. Evidence of significant hepatic, hematological, or immunocompromising condition
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AstraZeneca

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Forest Laboratories

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Medical Monitor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Forest Laboratories Inc, an affiliate of Allergan plc

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Investigational Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Sylmar, California, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

DeLand, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Kansas City, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Royal Oak, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Laconia, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Lima, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Investigational Site

Tbilisi, , Georgia

Site Status

Investigational Site

Mátraháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Investigational Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Wilkowice-Bystra, , Poland

Site Status

Investigational Site

Craiova, Dolj, Romania

Site Status

Investigational Site

Bucharest, , Romania

Site Status

Investigational Site

Iași, , Romania

Site Status

Investigational Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Investigational Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Investigational Site

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Investigational Site

Alicante, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Investigational Site

Dnipropetrovsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Investigational Site

Ivano-Frankivsik, , Ukraine

Site Status

Investigational Site

Kharkiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Investigational Site

Kyiv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Investigational Site

Zaporizhzhya, , Ukraine

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Georgia Hungary Poland Romania Russia Spain Ukraine

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

P903-25

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.