Cefadroxil and Cephalexin Drug Levels and Dosing in Pediatric Musculoskeletal Infections
NCT ID: NCT03802552
Last Updated: 2021-06-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
17 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-01
2021-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Cephalexin Versus Clindamycin for Suspected CA-MRSA Skin Infections
NCT00352612
Oral-only Antibiotics for Bone and Joint Infections in Children
NCT04563325
Oral Amoxicillin and Cephalexin PK/PD in Neonates
NCT04916951
A Study to Compare Cefdinir and Cephalexin for the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Uncomplicated Skin Infections
NCT00234949
Safety and Efficacy Study of Ceftaroline Versus a Comparator in Pediatric Subjects With Community Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP)
NCT01530763
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The most commonly used antibiotic for MSK infections is cephalexin, a first-generation cephalosporin. It is well tolerated, provides good tissue penetration, and has a preferred spectrum of activity for typical MSK pathogens, including methicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Despite cephalexin's widespread use, its most significant disadvantage is its short plasma half-life. Because of this, cephalexin is traditionally dosed four times daily (QID) for serious infections like osteomyelitis. However, this dosing frequency, especially for prolonged treatment courses, proves difficult for both patients and their families. Concern about poor adherence drives some providers to prolong IV therapy or dose cephalexin three times daily (TID), though there are insufficient pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) or outcome data to support TID dosing.
Cefadroxil, another first-generation cephalosporin, is an appealing alternative to cephalexin due to its longer half-life. Because of this, the investigators hypothesize that cefadroxil could be used effectively in pediatric patients with MSK infections with a more convenient dosing schedule than cephalexin. While cephalexin is typically dosed 3-4 times per day, cefadroxil could likely be dosed 2-3 times per day, even for serious infections like osteomyelitis. However, cefadroxil is rarely prescribed to children due to a lack of pediatric PK/PD data to guide dosing. Our study aims to address this unmet need and help physicians use these existing drugs in smarter and more effective ways in pediatric MSK infections.
The specific aims of this study are to:
1. Use a Population PK approach to define comparative PK parameters of cefadroxil and cephalexin in pediatric patients with MSK infections (osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, pyomyositis).
2. Establish reference MIC ranges for both cefadroxil and cephalexin against MSSA isolates.
3. Perform pharmacodynamic modeling (Monte Carlo simulation) based on the above PK parameters and MIC data to evaluate the expected PK/PD target attainment of cefadroxil and cephalexin at different dosing intervals: cephalexin given as 3 vs. 4 divided doses per day; cefadroxil given as 2 vs. 3 doses against a range of MICs.
To answer these questions, patients with MSK infections admitted to Children's Hospital Colorado (CHCO) will be enrolled in this study and sequentially given doses of both cefadroxil and cephalexin. After each oral dose, serum levels of the antibiotic will be measured at set time points until the drug is expected to be fully cleared. They will then receive the second antibiotic after a 24-hour washout period. MIC ranges will be measured based on banked MSSA isolates. Based on these study-derived PK and MIC data, adequacy of the studied cephalexin and cefadroxil dosing regimens will be analyzed.
If the study is able to confirm a favorable PK/PD profile for twice daily (BID) and/or three times daily (TID) cefadroxil dosing in children, even for severe infections, it could have an immediate impact on prescribing habits. Less frequent dosing would be an improvement over the current standard of care, allowing for easier medication administration, improved adherence, and increased provider confidence for early transition to oral therapy, which are all essential for optimal treatment of pediatric MSK infections.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cefadroxil then Cephalexin
Receive cefadroxil first, then receive cephalexin after washout.
Cefadroxil
oral one-time dose of cefadroxil
Cephalexin
oral one-time dose of cephalexin
Cephalexin then Cefadroxil
Receive cephalexin first, then receive cefadroxil after washout.
Cefadroxil
oral one-time dose of cefadroxil
Cephalexin
oral one-time dose of cephalexin
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cefadroxil
oral one-time dose of cefadroxil
Cephalexin
oral one-time dose of cephalexin
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Are to be treated for a deep musculoskeletal infection (osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, pyomyositis), as determined by their primary medical team
* Are aged 6 months to 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Are less than 6 months of age or greater than 18 years of age
* Weigh less than 5.5 kg
* Weigh greater than the 95%ile for age
* Have underlying current renal disease based on medical history
* Have an underlying chronic medical condition-examples include cystic fibrosis, sickle cell anemia, inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatitis, hepatitis, immunodeficiency, cancer, spina bifida, chromosomal abnormalities, cerebral palsy, or metabolic disorders.
* Have a history of significant drug allergy to any beta-lactam antibiotic (e.g. anaphylaxis and/or angioedema)
* Are on an oral cephalosporin at time of enrollment
* Are started on an oral cephalosporin during the study
o Note: If an enrolled patient is started on an oral cephalosporin prior to completion of the study, they will be removed from the study. However, data obtained prior to their receipt of an oral cephalosporin will still be included in the analysis.
* Are known to be pregnant
6 Months
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Colorado, Denver
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrew Haynes, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Colorado, Denver
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospital Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
18-2142
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.