Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
69 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-08-16
2022-02-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Intravenous Cefazolin Plus Oral Probenecid With Oral Cephalexin for the Treatment of Cellulitis
NCT01029782
High-dose Cephalexin for Cellulitis (HI-DOCC)
NCT05852262
Cellulitis Optimal Antibiotic Treatment
NCT05584007
Ceftriaxone as Home IV for Staph Infections
NCT04141787
Predictors of Failure of Empiric Outpatient Antibiotic Therapy in Emergency Department Patients With Uncomplicated Cellulitis.
NCT01972646
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Rationale: Before embarking on a large, multicenter trial, it is essential to conduct a smaller pilot to test and refine study procedures and to demonstrate feasibility.
Methods:
Design: The investigators will conduct a parallel arm double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial at the Civic and General campus ED of The Ottawa Hospital (TOH). The study will operate seven days a week from 0800 to 2000 over a 6-month timeframe. TOH Pharmacy will follow a randomization sequence and prepare study medication packages. Study medication packages will be dispensed to the patient by a registered nurse (RN).
Patients: Adult (age \>=18 years) ED patient with non-purulent cellulitis determined by the treating emergency physician to be eligible for outpatient care with oral antibiotics.
Intervention: High-dose cephalexin (1000 mg PO QID) for seven days.
Comparator: Standard-dose cephalexin (500 mg PO QID) plus placebo for seven days.
Primary Feasibility Outcome: Patient recruitment rate (percentage of approached eligible patients who are successfully recruited). The goal is to recruit at least 29% of eligible patients.
Primary Effectiveness Outcome: 1. Oral antibiotic treatment failure, defined as a change in antibiotic (change in class of oral antibiotic or step up to intravenous therapy) within 7 days due to worsening infection, which is defined as:
1. New fever (temperature ≥ 38.0C) or persistent fever at Day 3 follow up; or
2. Increasing area of erythema ≥20% from baseline; or
3. Increasing pain ≥2 points from baseline (numeric rating scale)
The secondary effectiveness outcomes are:
1. Clinical cure (no erythema, pain and fever) at day 7
2. Clinical response (≥20% reduction in area of erythema compared to baseline) at day 3
3. Adverse events (e.g. vomiting, diarrhea, rash) at 14-day telephone follow-up
4. Unplanned i) return ED visits; and ii) hospitalization at 14-day telephone follow-up
Importance: This pilot trial will be the first to compare high-dose cephalexin to standard-dose cephalexin for ED patients with cellulitis. The results of this pilot randomized trial will help inform the design and implementation of a larger, multicenter randomized controlled trial to answer this important clinical question.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High Dose Cephalexin
The intervention is high-dose cephalexin (1000mg PO QID) for seven days
Cephalexin
1000 mg PO QID for 7 days
Standard Dose Cephalexin
The comparator is standard-dose cephalexin (500mg PO QID) plus oral placebo for seven days
Cephalexin + placebo
500 mg PO QID plus oral placebo for 7 days
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cephalexin
1000 mg PO QID for 7 days
Cephalexin + placebo
500 mg PO QID plus oral placebo for 7 days
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
2. Patient already taking oral antibiotics
3. Treating physician decides that intravenous therapy is required
4. Abscess requiring an incision and drainage or needle aspiration procedure
5. Known prior cellulitis secondary to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
6. Cellulitis secondary to a human or animal bite wound
7. Surgical site infection
8. Malignancy and currently being treated with chemotherapy
9. Febrile neutropenia (temperature \>=38C plus absolute neutrophil count \<500 cells/uL)
10. Solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipient
11. Renal impairment with creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min
12. Pregnant or breastfeeding
13. Allergy to cephalosporins or history of anaphylaxis to penicillin
14. Inability to provide consent
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Association
OTHER
Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians
INDUSTRY
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Krishan Yadav, MD, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Stevens DL, Eron LL. In the clinic. Cellulitis and soft-tissue infections. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jan 6;150(1):ITC11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-1-200901060-01001.
Stenstrom R, Grafstein E, Romney M, Fahimi J, Harris D, Hunte G, Innes G, Christenson J. Prevalence of and risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infection in a Canadian emergency department. CJEM. 2009 Sep;11(5):430-8. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500011623.
Yadav K, Suh KN, Eagles D, MacIsaac J, Ritchie D, Bernick J, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Wells G, Stiell IG. Predictors of Oral Antibiotic Treatment Failure for Nonpurulent Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;26(1):51-59. doi: 10.1111/acem.13492. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
Pollack CV Jr, Amin A, Ford WT Jr, Finley R, Kaye KS, Nguyen HH, Rybak MJ, Talan D. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI): practice guidelines for management and care transitions in the emergency department and hospital. J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;48(4):508-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Jan 17.
Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJ, Gorbach SL, Hirschmann JV, Kaplan SL, Montoya JG, Wade JC; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15;59(2):e10-52. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu444.
Kwak YG, Choi SH, Kim T, Park SY, Seo SH, Kim MB, Choi SH. Clinical Guidelines for the Antibiotic Treatment for Community-Acquired Skin and Soft Tissue Infection. Infect Chemother. 2017 Dec;49(4):301-325. doi: 10.3947/ic.2017.49.4.301.
Li HK, Agweyu A, English M, Bejon P. An unsupported preference for intravenous antibiotics. PLoS Med. 2015 May 19;12(5):e1001825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001825. eCollection 2015 May.
Cyriac JM, James E. Switch over from intravenous to oral therapy: A concise overview. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2014 Apr;5(2):83-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.130042.
Yadav K, Gatien M, Corrales-Medina V, Stiell I. Antimicrobial treatment decision for non-purulent skin and soft tissue infections in the emergency department. CJEM. 2017 May;19(3):175-180. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.347. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
Chow M, Quintiliani R, Cunha BA, Thompson M, Finkelstein E, Nightingale CH. Pharmacokinetics of high-dose oral cephalosporins. J Clin Pharmacol. 1979 Apr;19(4):185-94. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1979.tb01650.x. No abstract available.
Wise R. The pharmacokinetics of the oral cephalosporins--a review. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Dec;26 Suppl E:13-20. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.suppl_e.13.
Murray H, Stiell I, Wells G. Treatment failure in emergency department patients with cellulitis. CJEM. 2005 Jul;7(4):228-34. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500014342.
Peterson D, McLeod S, Woolfrey K, McRae A. Predictors of failure of empiric outpatient antibiotic therapy in emergency department patients with uncomplicated cellulitis. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 May;21(5):526-31. doi: 10.1111/acem.12371.
Yadav K, Nath A, Suh KN, Sikora L, Eagles D. Treatment failure definitions for non-purulent skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review. Infection. 2020 Feb;48(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01347-w. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
Yadav K, Eagles D, Perry JJ, Taljaard M, Sandino-Gold G, Nemnom MJ, Corrales-Medina V, Suh KN, Stiell IG. High-dose cephalexin for cellulitis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. CJEM. 2023 Jan;25(1):22-30. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00433-7. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20200175
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.