High-dose vs. Standard-dose Cephalexin for Cellulitis

NCT ID: NCT04471246

Last Updated: 2025-01-17

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

69 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-08-16

Study Completion Date

2022-02-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Cellulitis is a painful bacterial infection of the skin and underlying tissue that needs antibiotic treatment. There are approximately 193,000 visits to Canadian emergency departments (EDs) each year for cellulitis. Emergency doctors who treat patients with cellulitis must decide on the correct antibiotic agent, dose, duration and frequency. Cellulitis is most commonly treated with the oral antibiotic cephalexin. However, there has been little research to guide doctors with respect to cellulitis treatment, which has led to an overuse of intravenous antibiotics. In addition, the current treatment failure rate of 20% is unacceptably high. When compared to standard-dose oral cephalexin, high-dose oral cephalexin may reduce treatment failure, which would help decrease the need for intravenous antibiotics and subsequent hospitalization. A well-designed clinical trial is necessary to determine if high-dose oral cephalexin reduces treatment failure for cellulitis patients. This pilot trial will determine the feasibility and design of such a clinical trial.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Cellulitis is a common clinical condition that represents up to 3% of all emergency department (ED) visits. The current treatment failure rate is approximately 20%. This high treatment failure rate may be due to suboptimal dosing of cephalexin. The Investigators hypothesize that high-dose cephalexin may lead to lower rates of treatment failure and subsequently improved patient outcomes (less hospitalizations and avoidance of intravenous antibiotics)

Rationale: Before embarking on a large, multicenter trial, it is essential to conduct a smaller pilot to test and refine study procedures and to demonstrate feasibility.

Methods:

Design: The investigators will conduct a parallel arm double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial at the Civic and General campus ED of The Ottawa Hospital (TOH). The study will operate seven days a week from 0800 to 2000 over a 6-month timeframe. TOH Pharmacy will follow a randomization sequence and prepare study medication packages. Study medication packages will be dispensed to the patient by a registered nurse (RN).

Patients: Adult (age \>=18 years) ED patient with non-purulent cellulitis determined by the treating emergency physician to be eligible for outpatient care with oral antibiotics.

Intervention: High-dose cephalexin (1000 mg PO QID) for seven days.

Comparator: Standard-dose cephalexin (500 mg PO QID) plus placebo for seven days.

Primary Feasibility Outcome: Patient recruitment rate (percentage of approached eligible patients who are successfully recruited). The goal is to recruit at least 29% of eligible patients.

Primary Effectiveness Outcome: 1. Oral antibiotic treatment failure, defined as a change in antibiotic (change in class of oral antibiotic or step up to intravenous therapy) within 7 days due to worsening infection, which is defined as:

1. New fever (temperature ≥ 38.0C) or persistent fever at Day 3 follow up; or
2. Increasing area of erythema ≥20% from baseline; or
3. Increasing pain ≥2 points from baseline (numeric rating scale)

The secondary effectiveness outcomes are:

1. Clinical cure (no erythema, pain and fever) at day 7
2. Clinical response (≥20% reduction in area of erythema compared to baseline) at day 3
3. Adverse events (e.g. vomiting, diarrhea, rash) at 14-day telephone follow-up
4. Unplanned i) return ED visits; and ii) hospitalization at 14-day telephone follow-up

Importance: This pilot trial will be the first to compare high-dose cephalexin to standard-dose cephalexin for ED patients with cellulitis. The results of this pilot randomized trial will help inform the design and implementation of a larger, multicenter randomized controlled trial to answer this important clinical question.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cellulitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The Investigators will conduct a parallel arm double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
Eligible patients will be randomized (1:1) to high-dose versus standard-dose arms. The randomization sequence will be computer-generated by a statistician

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High Dose Cephalexin

The intervention is high-dose cephalexin (1000mg PO QID) for seven days

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Cephalexin

Intervention Type DRUG

1000 mg PO QID for 7 days

Standard Dose Cephalexin

The comparator is standard-dose cephalexin (500mg PO QID) plus oral placebo for seven days

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cephalexin + placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

500 mg PO QID plus oral placebo for 7 days

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cephalexin

1000 mg PO QID for 7 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Cephalexin + placebo

500 mg PO QID plus oral placebo for 7 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

High-dose cephalexin Standard-dose cephalexin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Adults (age \>=18 years) with non-purulent cellulitis determined by the treating emergency physician to be eligible for outpatient care with oral antibiotics.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age \<18 years
2. Patient already taking oral antibiotics
3. Treating physician decides that intravenous therapy is required
4. Abscess requiring an incision and drainage or needle aspiration procedure
5. Known prior cellulitis secondary to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
6. Cellulitis secondary to a human or animal bite wound
7. Surgical site infection
8. Malignancy and currently being treated with chemotherapy
9. Febrile neutropenia (temperature \>=38C plus absolute neutrophil count \<500 cells/uL)
10. Solid organ or bone marrow transplant recipient
11. Renal impairment with creatinine clearance \<30 mL/min
12. Pregnant or breastfeeding
13. Allergy to cephalosporins or history of anaphylaxis to penicillin
14. Inability to provide consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Association

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Krishan Yadav, MD, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stevens DL, Eron LL. In the clinic. Cellulitis and soft-tissue infections. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jan 6;150(1):ITC11. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-1-200901060-01001.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19124814 (View on PubMed)

Stenstrom R, Grafstein E, Romney M, Fahimi J, Harris D, Hunte G, Innes G, Christenson J. Prevalence of and risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infection in a Canadian emergency department. CJEM. 2009 Sep;11(5):430-8. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500011623.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 19788787 (View on PubMed)

Yadav K, Suh KN, Eagles D, MacIsaac J, Ritchie D, Bernick J, Thiruganasambandamoorthy V, Wells G, Stiell IG. Predictors of Oral Antibiotic Treatment Failure for Nonpurulent Skin and Soft Tissue Infections in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Jan;26(1):51-59. doi: 10.1111/acem.13492. Epub 2018 Jul 4.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29869364 (View on PubMed)

Pollack CV Jr, Amin A, Ford WT Jr, Finley R, Kaye KS, Nguyen HH, Rybak MJ, Talan D. Acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI): practice guidelines for management and care transitions in the emergency department and hospital. J Emerg Med. 2015 Apr;48(4):508-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.001. Epub 2015 Jan 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25605319 (View on PubMed)

Stevens DL, Bisno AL, Chambers HF, Dellinger EP, Goldstein EJ, Gorbach SL, Hirschmann JV, Kaplan SL, Montoya JG, Wade JC; Infectious Diseases Society of America. Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of skin and soft tissue infections: 2014 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Jul 15;59(2):e10-52. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu444.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24973422 (View on PubMed)

Kwak YG, Choi SH, Kim T, Park SY, Seo SH, Kim MB, Choi SH. Clinical Guidelines for the Antibiotic Treatment for Community-Acquired Skin and Soft Tissue Infection. Infect Chemother. 2017 Dec;49(4):301-325. doi: 10.3947/ic.2017.49.4.301.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 29299899 (View on PubMed)

Li HK, Agweyu A, English M, Bejon P. An unsupported preference for intravenous antibiotics. PLoS Med. 2015 May 19;12(5):e1001825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001825. eCollection 2015 May.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 25992781 (View on PubMed)

Cyriac JM, James E. Switch over from intravenous to oral therapy: A concise overview. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2014 Apr;5(2):83-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-500X.130042.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24799810 (View on PubMed)

Yadav K, Gatien M, Corrales-Medina V, Stiell I. Antimicrobial treatment decision for non-purulent skin and soft tissue infections in the emergency department. CJEM. 2017 May;19(3):175-180. doi: 10.1017/cem.2016.347. Epub 2016 Aug 17.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 27531595 (View on PubMed)

Chow M, Quintiliani R, Cunha BA, Thompson M, Finkelstein E, Nightingale CH. Pharmacokinetics of high-dose oral cephalosporins. J Clin Pharmacol. 1979 Apr;19(4):185-94. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1979.tb01650.x. No abstract available.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 438352 (View on PubMed)

Wise R. The pharmacokinetics of the oral cephalosporins--a review. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1990 Dec;26 Suppl E:13-20. doi: 10.1093/jac/26.suppl_e.13.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 2292525 (View on PubMed)

Murray H, Stiell I, Wells G. Treatment failure in emergency department patients with cellulitis. CJEM. 2005 Jul;7(4):228-34. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500014342.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 17355677 (View on PubMed)

Peterson D, McLeod S, Woolfrey K, McRae A. Predictors of failure of empiric outpatient antibiotic therapy in emergency department patients with uncomplicated cellulitis. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 May;21(5):526-31. doi: 10.1111/acem.12371.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 24842503 (View on PubMed)

Yadav K, Nath A, Suh KN, Sikora L, Eagles D. Treatment failure definitions for non-purulent skin and soft tissue infections: a systematic review. Infection. 2020 Feb;48(1):75-83. doi: 10.1007/s15010-019-01347-w. Epub 2019 Aug 5.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 31378847 (View on PubMed)

Yadav K, Eagles D, Perry JJ, Taljaard M, Sandino-Gold G, Nemnom MJ, Corrales-Medina V, Suh KN, Stiell IG. High-dose cephalexin for cellulitis: a pilot randomized controlled trial. CJEM. 2023 Jan;25(1):22-30. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00433-7. Epub 2023 Jan 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36592299 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20200175

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cefazolin PK Study 3g vs 2g
NCT05309304 COMPLETED PHASE1