Early Termination of Empirical Antibiotics in Febrile Neutropenia in Children With Cancer

NCT ID: NCT04637464

Last Updated: 2025-04-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

93 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-11-20

Study Completion Date

2025-03-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study is a nationwide, multicenter, open label, randomized controlled trial.

A target population of 220 children in treatment for cancer with neutropenic fever and a neutrophil count below 0.5 × 10⁹ cells/L with expected duration for more than 7 days will be recruited during the first 48 hours of antibiotic treatment (24 months inclusion period). They will be randomized 1:1 as follows:

* Experimental group: Discontinuation of antibiotics, despite neutrophil count below 0.5 × 10⁹ cells/L, after 48 hours of apyrexia and clinical stability
* Control group: Discontinuation of antibiotics when neutrophil count is equal to or above 0.5 × 10⁹ cells/L and the child is afebrile and clinically stable (up to maximum of 14 days after apyrexia and clinical stability).

Primary endpoint is the number of days without antibiotic treatment in 28 days after treatment initiation. Secondary endpoints are crude mortality, severe adverse events, days with relapsing fever, and alterations of the microbiome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND: In children with cancer, infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality due to chemotherapy-related immunosuppression, comprising up to 70% of all treatment-related deaths. The relationship between neutropenia and life-threatening infection has been well established, and any signs of infection including fever has to be treated promptly with broad spectrum antibiotics. However, the duration of antibiotic therapy in pediatric cancer patients with febrile neutropenia without a known source is unknown. Traditionally, antibiotic therapy is continued until neutrophil recovery, due to fear of relapse of infection potentially as life-threatening sepsis, but scientific evidence supporting this strategy is limited. It has been debated that the strategy may be over-cautious, leading to unnecessarily prolonged antibiotic treatments with important side effects, including extended hospital admissions, adverse drug events, super-infection with fungi and multi-resistant bacteria, and thus affecting the children on both short and long term.

Studies in adults have shown that withdrawal of empirical antimicrobial therapy based on clinical assessment, despite severe neutropenia, can reduce antibiotic treatment significantly without compromising patient safety. This approach is warranted in children with cancer, but no randomized studies have been conducted in high risk children with prolonged neutropenia. A few studies have documented that early discontinuation of empirical antibiotics in low-risk children with short-lasting neutropenia is safe, but as stressed by recent international guidelines, the question of optimal duration of empirical antibiotics for high-risk children with prolonged bone marrow suppression continues to be a major research gap.

HYPOTHESIS: Empirical antibiotic therapy of febrile neutropenia can safely be discontinued after 48 hours of apyrexia and clinical stability, despite severe neutropenia, in high-risk children with expected prolonged neutropenia.

AIM: To establish evidence-based treatment strategies for children with febrile neutropenia by performing a randomized controlled trial investigating the efficacy and safety of early termination of empirical antibiotic therapy.

METHODS: Children treated at one of the 4 pediatric oncology departments in Denmark who are admitted with neutropenic fever will be evaluated according to current routines, including complete physical examination, assessment of severity signs and source, blood samples (biochemistry and hematology), blood cultures (collected from the central venous catheter), and additional samples from infected sites as clinically indicated. After obtaining cultures, empiric antibiotic therapy for neutropenic fever is started. The type of antibiotics will depend on current local guideline. Children who remain febrile despite empirical antibiotic therapy will be treated and investigated according to local and international guidelines.

Eligible subjects will be screened and included as described.

Included subjects will be followed for 28 days after initiation of empirical antibiotic treatment or until neutrophile recovery, whichever is longest.

They will be assessed at the following protocolled time points:

1. At 48 hours of apyrexia
2. At recovery of neutropenia
3. At 28 (±2) days (final assessment)
4. In the event of relapsing fever after the initial 48 hours of apyrexia during the follow-up period.

Each assessment will include a clinical interview, targeted physical examination and review of patient chart including biochemistry and hematology. A fecal and a pharyngeal swap will be collected and stored at the final assessment.

Children receiving antibiotics with no additional need for in-hospital treatment can receive their antibiotic treatment by continuous infusion on a portable pump and discharged to outpatient therapy, according to local department guidelines.

STATISTICS: The number of days free of antibiotics will be compared between the groups by linear regression analysis. A multivariate linear regression analysis will be carried out adjusting for age, gender, neutropenia duration, and underlying malignant disease and other significant risk factors.

Secondary outcomes will be compared by a non-inferiority assumption with an inferiority margin of 10%. All tests will be two-sided, with p values of 0.05 considered significant. An interim analysis will be conducted when 50% of the patients have been recruited to assess the safety of the study. A worst-case imputation method will be used for missing data in an exploratory sensitivity analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neutropenia, Febrile Pediatric Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Patients receiving empirical antibiotic treatment due to high risk neutropenic fever will be randomly assigned 1:1 to one of two groups regimens. Randomization can occur from 36 hours after initiation of antibiotics until 48 hours of apyrexia and clinical stability. The allocated treatment regimen is followed from randomization until neutrophil recovery, also in case of relapsing fever after termination of antibiotic treatment.

A participant can be randomized more than once, but only one time during each episode of neutropenia, i.e. bone marrow recovery and subsequent chemotherapy treatment must have taken place before a new randomization can occur.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Experimental group

Discontinuation of empirical antibiotics, despite neutrophil count below 0.5x10⁹ cells/L, after 48 hours of apyrexia and clinical stability.

A child is considered clinically stable when there is resolution of all symptoms and signs of infection, and normalization of vital signs including heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, blood pressure, and daily diuresis.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Early termination of empirical antibiotics

Intervention Type OTHER

Termination of empirical antibiotics for febrile neutropenia based on clinical parameters, regardless of neutrophile count.

Control group

Discontinuation of antibiotics when neutrophil count is equal to or above 0.5x10⁹ cells/L, and the child is afebrile and clinical stable OR the child has received 10 days of antibiotics and have been afebrile and clinically stable for 7 days

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Early termination of empirical antibiotics

Termination of empirical antibiotics for febrile neutropenia based on clinical parameters, regardless of neutrophile count.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. patient with cancer aged 18 years or below,
2. absolute neutrophil count below 0.5x10⁹/L with expected duration of neutropenia for more than 7 days, and
3. a single temperature of at least 38.5°C, or a temperature above 38.0°C sustained over a 1-hour period (auricular, oral or rectal).

Exclusion Criteria

1. known etiology of fever, defined by a clinically significant positive culture (blood, urine, tracheal) collected during the feverish episode or a clinically documented focal infection despite negative cultures (e.g. pneumonia and cellulitis),
2. obvious non-infectious causes of fever (e.g. drug and transfusion related),
3. children requiring prophylactic antibacterial antibiotics according to protocol besides co-trimoxazole for Pneumocystis jirovecii after the febrile episode.
Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kjeld Schmiegelow

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kjeld Schmiegelow

Professor in Paediatrics

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nadja Vissing, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen, , Denmark

Site Status

Odense Univesity Hospital

Odense, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

EarlyTerm

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.