Disturbance of the Intestinal Microbiota by Temocillin vs Cefotaxime in Treatment of Febrile Urinary Tract Infections

NCT ID: NCT02959957

Last Updated: 2019-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

157 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-20

Study Completion Date

2019-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will evaluate the ecological impact on the intestinal microbiota and compare the safety and efficacy of temocillin compared to cefotaxime, in empiric treatment of febrile UTI. Half of participants will receive temocillin and the other half will receive cefotaxime.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Temocillin is a narrow spectrum antibiotic with activity against gram negative bacteria inclusive many ESBL producing bacteria. Temocillin is approved and marketed in a few European countries since the 1980´s but not in Sweden.

The aim of the study is to find an ecological favorable alternative to cephalosporins in the treatment of this common indication.

The hypothesis is that treatment with temocillin causes less disturbances on the intestinal microbiota while at least comparable efficacy.

The study will be performed as an open prospective multicentre study with two parallel groups comparing 2 g temocillin three times daily with 1-2 g cefotaxim three times daily for 7-10 days in male and female adult patients with febrile urinary tract infection.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Urinary Tract Infections

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Temocillin

Temocillin powder for solution för injection/infusion, per day 6 g (2 g three times per day). Treatment length 7-10 days of which at least 3 days administration with the study drug.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Temocillin

Intervention Type DRUG

Total antibiotic treatment 7-10 days, of which at least 72 hours (9 doses) initial temocillin administration. In case of bacteraemia at baseline the total antibiotic treatment can be extended up to 14 days.

Cefotaxime

Cefotaxime powder for solution för injection/infusion, per day 3-6 g (1-2 g three times per day). Treatment length 7-10 days of which at least 3 days administration with the study drug.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cefotaxime

Intervention Type DRUG

Total antibiotic treatment 7-10 days, of which at least 72 hours (9 doses) initial cefotaxime administration. In case of bacteraemia at baseline the total antibiotic treatment can be extended up to 14 days.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Temocillin

Total antibiotic treatment 7-10 days, of which at least 72 hours (9 doses) initial temocillin administration. In case of bacteraemia at baseline the total antibiotic treatment can be extended up to 14 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Cefotaxime

Total antibiotic treatment 7-10 days, of which at least 72 hours (9 doses) initial cefotaxime administration. In case of bacteraemia at baseline the total antibiotic treatment can be extended up to 14 days.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Negaban Claforan

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Males and females ≥ 18 years of age with suspected or confirmed febrile UTI, fulfilling at least one of the following signs and symptoms:

* Flank pain or suprapubic pain, Tenderness over the kidney on physical examination, Urinary symptoms such as dysuria, urinary frequency or urinary urgency
* Fever ≥ 38.0°C (highest temperature recorded at home or at the hospital)
* Positive urinalysis tests (U-Nitrit and/or U-LPK)
* Have a pre-treatment baseline urinary culture obtained
* Require iv antibacterial treatment of the presumed infection
* Fertile women: Agree to practice highly effective anti-contraceptive methods from study-start to TOC
* Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Have a documented history of hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any beta-lactam
* Pregnant or nursing women
* Receipt of any prior potentially therapeutic antibacterial agent within 1 month before randomisation and sampling for urine and faecal cultures. Exceptions will prior treatment with pivmecillinam or nitrofurantoin.
* Known chronic renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance \< 10 mL/min at screening as estimated by Cockcroft-Gault), or receiving intermittent haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis
* Known colonization with ESBL
* Any condition or circumstance that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise the safety of the subject or the quality of study data.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Håkan Hanberger

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Håkan Hanberger

Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Håkan Hanberger, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Linkoeping

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karolinska University Hospital

Solna, Stockholm County, Sweden

Site Status

Helsingborg Hospital

Helsingborg, , Sweden

Site Status

Centralsjukhuset Kristianstad

Kristianstad, , Sweden

Site Status

Linköping University Hospital

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Skåne University Hospital

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Vrinnevisjukhuset i Norrköping

Norrköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Örebro University Hospital

Örebro, , Sweden

Site Status

Östersund Hospital

Östersund, , Sweden

Site Status

Capio S:t Görans hospital

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Sundsvall Hospital

Sundsvall, , Sweden

Site Status

University Hospital of Umeå

Umeå, , Sweden

Site Status

Västmanlands sjukhus i Västerås

Västerås, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2015-003898-15

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

FoHM/UVI 2015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cefotetan Therapy for Escherichia Coli Infections
NCT07318584 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2