Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Spectroscopy Techniques
NCT ID: NCT00001219
Last Updated: 2020-06-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
49946 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
1987-06-18
2020-06-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Unlike other diagnostic techniques (CT scan and PET scan) MRI and MRS do not use ionizing radiation. Some studies have shown that MRI is more effective at distinguishing normal parts of the anatomy from abnormal anatomy, especially in the brain. MRI has become the diagnostic test of choice for evaluating patient with multiple sclerosis.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate normal volunteers and patients with a variety of diseases with magnetic resonance imaging. Researchers will attempt different magnetic resonance imaging methods and techniques as well as different levels of magnetic strength.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Refinement and Assessment of New MRI Technologies for Thoracic/ Cardiovascular Exams
NCT00727792
Toward an Automated Method of Abdominal Fat Segmentation of MR Images
NCT01228968
Technical Evaluation of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy
NCT00001874
Development of 3T Magnetic Resonance Research Methods for NIA Studies
NCT01324206
Diagnostic Accuracy of MR in Myositis
NCT01702870
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
MRI is a constantly evolving imaging modality. Pulse sequences are often modified to improve their performance. However, many of these changes have not yet been approved by the FDA and therefore, are not considered standard of care. Some of these sequences require the use of new types of imaging coils, which are also investigational.
Objectives:
The major purpose of this protocol is to inform patients undergoing MR scans in the Clinical Center that they be scanned with MRI sequences and/or coils which may or may not be FDA approved and to get the patient s consent for this. This is not a formal research study since specific disease entities and specific pulse sequences are not studied in a systematic way. Rather, the purpose is to give NIH patients access to gradual improvements in MR technology that would otherwise not be available to them.
Eligibility:
All patients who, by virtue of the NIH protocol in which they are enrolled, qualify for MRI will be eligible for participation in this protocol.
Design:
Up to 99,999 participants will be enrolled in this study.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients undergoing MRI in the Clinical Center
All patients who, by virtue of the NIH protocol in which they are enrolled, who qualify for MRI will be eligible for participation in this protocol.
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients must be able to provide informed consents.
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to understand consent form or consent process and the absence of a suitable guardian.
* Adults who are or may not be able to consent
* Patients in whom the scan must be performed quickly, i.e. those patients under anesthesia, anxious patients, those requiring emergency medical care, or others in which it is deemed inappropriate to prolong a study.
* Refusal to Participate.
* Pregnant women and fetuses
* Neonates
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John A Butman, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Frank JA, Dwyer AJ, Doppman JL. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging in oncology. Important Adv Oncol. 1987:133-74.
Roschmann P, Tischler R. Surface coil proton MR imaging at 2 T. Radiology. 1986 Oct;161(1):251-5. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.1.3763875.
Kim EE, Pjura G, Lowry P, Verani R, Sandler C, Flechner S, Kahan B. Cyclosporin-A nephrotoxicity and acute cellular rejection in renal transplant recipients: correlation between radionuclide and histologic findings. Radiology. 1986 May;159(2):443-6. doi: 10.1148/radiology.159.2.3515421.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
87-CC-0091
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
870091
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.