Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine Scalp Nerve Block for Postoperative Pain Management After Supratentorial Craniotomy
NCT ID: NCT07344181
Last Updated: 2026-01-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
118 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-12-01
2027-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A total of 118 eligible patients (aged 18-64, ASA I-III) will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups. The intervention group will receive a scalp nerve block using liposomal bupivacaine. The control group will receive a scalp nerve block using standard 0.5% bupivacaine. All patients will undergo standardized general anesthesia.
The primary outcome is postoperative pain intensity, measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at multiple time points: 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, patient satisfaction, cumulative opioid consumption, and the incidence of adverse events.
The study aims to determine if a single administration of liposomal bupivacaine provides superior and prolonged analgesia compared to conventional bupivacaine, potentially improving pain management and recovery for craniotomy patients. The study duration is from October 2024 to May 2027.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Liposomal Bupivacaine for Postoperative Pain After Craniotomy
NCT06701539
The Analgesic Effect of Scalp Nerve Block Using Bupivacaine Liposomes for Postoperative Pain Relief After Craniotomy
NCT07049094
Liposomal vs. Conventional Bupivacaine for Pain Control
NCT06231355
Safety and Efficacy of Addition of Hyaluronidase to Lidocaine and Bupivacaine in Scalp Nerves Block in Elective Craniotomy Operations, Comparative Study
NCT03411330
Effect of Local Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine on Postoperative Analgesia in Patients With Craniotomy Microvascular Decompression
NCT07245290
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Postoperative pain following supratentorial craniotomy is a significant clinical concern, often requiring opioid-based analgesia. However, opioid use in neurosurgical patients is limited by side effects such as sedation, respiratory depression, and nausea, which can obscure neurological assessment and delay recovery. Scalp nerve blocks (SNBs) with local anesthetics like bupivacaine are a well-established component of multimodal analgesia for craniotomy, targeting the primary sources of postoperative pain-the pericranial muscles and scalp tissues. While effective, conventional bupivacaine provides analgesia for only up to 6-8 hours, leaving patients with inadequate pain control during the critical 72-hour postoperative period.
Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) is an extended-release formulation designed to provide sustained analgesia for up to 72 hours. Its efficacy has been demonstrated in various surgical settings, but its application in neurosurgery, particularly for scalp nerve blocks, remains underexplored. This study aims to investigate whether a single preoperative scalp nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine can provide superior and prolonged analgesia compared to standard bupivacaine, thereby reducing opioid consumption and improving patient outcomes following craniotomy.
2. Objectives:
Primary Objective: To compare the efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine versus standard bupivacaine for scalp nerve blocks in controlling postoperative pain, as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery.
Secondary Objectives:
To assess differences in cumulative opioid consumption postoperatively.
To evaluate patient satisfaction using a standardized satisfaction scale.
To monitor neurological status using the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS).
To record the incidence of adverse events (e.g., infection, hematoma, neurological deficits).
3. Study Design:
Design: Prospective, single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial.
Randomization: Eligible participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either the intervention group (liposomal bupivacaine) or the control group (standard 0.5% bupivacaine). Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated sequence.
Blinding: Outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to group assignments. Due to the nature of the intervention, treating clinicians will not be blinded.
4. Participants:
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults aged 18-64 years.
Scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia.
ASA physical status I-III.
Preoperative GCS score of 15.
Ability to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
Chronic pain syndromes, opioid tolerance, or psychiatric disorders.
Coagulopathy or infection at the block site.
Allergy to local anesthetics.
BMI \<15 or \>35.
5. Interventions:
Intervention Group: Preoperative scalp nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine.
Control Group: Preoperative scalp nerve block with 0.5% bupivacaine.
Both groups will receive standardized general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia, including rescue opioids.
6. Outcome Measures:
Primary Outcome: NRS pain scores at 2, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively.
Secondary Outcomes:
Opioid consumption (morphine equivalents).
Patient satisfaction scores (5-point Likert scale).
GCS scores.
Adverse events related to the block or study drugs.
7. Sample Size:
A total of 118 participants (59 per group) will be enrolled, accounting for a 20% dropout rate. This provides 90% power to detect a 25% difference in analgesia duration at a 5% significance level.
8. Statistical Analysis:
Data will be analyzed using SPSS v25.0. Continuous variables will be compared using t-tests or Mann-Whitney U tests; categorical variables will be analyzed with chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. Repeated-measures ANOVA will assess pain scores over time. A p-value \<0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
intervention group
Preoperative scalp nerve block with liposomal bupivacaine.
Preoperative scalp nerve block
Block of the supraorbital nerve, supratrochlear nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, zygomaticotemporal nerve, greater occipital nerve, and lesser occipital nerve.
Control Group
Preoperative scalp nerve block with 0.5% bupivacaine.
Preoperative scalp nerve block
Block of the supraorbital nerve, supratrochlear nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, zygomaticotemporal nerve, greater occipital nerve, and lesser occipital nerve.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Preoperative scalp nerve block
Block of the supraorbital nerve, supratrochlear nerve, auriculotemporal nerve, zygomaticotemporal nerve, greater occipital nerve, and lesser occipital nerve.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Scheduled for elective supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia.
ASA physical status I-III.
Preoperative GCS score of 15.
Ability to provide informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
Coagulopathy or infection at the block site.
Allergy to local anesthetics.
BMI \<15 or \>35.
18 Years
64 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fang Luo
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Fang Luo
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University,Beijing, China
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beijing Tiantan Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KY2025-005-02
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.