Bupivacaine 0.125% Versus Bupivacaine 0.25% in Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Tympanomastoid Surgeries in Adults

NCT ID: NCT06381401

Last Updated: 2024-05-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-05-01

Study Completion Date

2024-07-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Bleeding is one of the most common complications in tympanomastoid surgery that could prolong the time of operation and also might lead to morbidity. Pain is also one of the most annoying complications of tympanomastoid surgeries. Thus, adequate surgical field visualization is utmost important. A bloodless field allows optimal exposure and identification of vital neurovascular structures. Even small bleeding, inconsequential for the patient's volume status, can create great technical difficulty in the confined space of the tympan, leading to prolonged surgery, incomplete procedures, and increased complications.

The use of regional nerve blocks as an alternative to hypotensive anesthesia has gained popularity in recent years. The superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) provides effective analgesia and reduces sympathetic activity, resulting in reduced bleeding and improved surgical conditions. The superficial cervical plexus (SCP) provides sensory innervation to the ear and surrounding structures, reducing pain perception during and after surgery.

This is the first randomized controlled clinical trial investigating the effect of combined general anesthesia with SCPB using 0.125% versus 0.25% bupivacaine during tympanomastoid surgery.

This study aims to compare the efficacy of two different concentrations of bupivacaine 0.125% \& 0.25% in Superficial Cervical Plexus Block in patients undergoing tympanomastoid surgery on operative field visualization, intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and postoperative analgesia.

The investigators hypothesize that bupivacaine 0.125% would be non-inferior to bupivacaine 0.25% in achieving optimal surgical field visualization, hemodynamic stability, surgeon satisfaction and postoperative analgesia.

This prospective double-blinded study will be carried out on 60 patients between 21 to 70 years, with ASA I-II and undergoing tympanomastoid surgery. Participants were equally divided into two groups: Group A: Patients received SCPB using 0.25% bupivacaine (5ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 5ml normal saline). Group B: Patients received SCPB using 0.125% bupivacaine (2.5ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 7.5ml normal saline).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Surgical Field Acute Postoperative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Bupivacaine 0.25%

Patients will receive superficial cervical plexus block using 0.25% bupivacaine (5ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 5ml normal saline).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

bupivacaine 0.25%

Intervention Type DRUG

superficial cervical plexus block using 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%

Bupivacaine 0.125%

Patients will receive superficial cervical plexus block using 0.125% bupivacaine (2.5ml of bupivacaine 0.5% + 7.5ml normal saline).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

bupivacaine 0.125%

Intervention Type DRUG

superficial cervical plexus block using 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.125%

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bupivacaine 0.25%

superficial cervical plexus block using 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.25%

Intervention Type DRUG

bupivacaine 0.125%

superficial cervical plexus block using 10 ml of bupivacaine 0.125%

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Adults between 21 - 70 years.
2. Patients undergoing tympanomastoid surgery.
3. Both genders.
4. ASA physical class I and II.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient refusal.
2. Uncooperative patients.
3. Allergy to the drug enrolled in the study.
4. Anatomical abnormality at injection site.
5. Infection at injection site.
6. Bleeding disorders.
7. ASA physical class III and IV patients.
8. Patients having significant chronic diseases as: uncontrolled asthma, cardiovascular disorders (significant arrhythmias, severe valvular diseases, congenital heart diseases, ischemic heart disease, or cardiomyopathy).
9. Renal impairment (creatinine level ≥ 2mg/dl), or uncompensated chronic liver disease.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kareem Mohammed Assem Nawwar

Lecturer

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nevan M Mekawy, M.D.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Professor of Anesthesiology, Surgical ICU & Pain Management, Cairo University

Mohsen M Waheb, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Surgical ICU & Pain Management, Cairo University

Kareem MA Nawwar, M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Lecturer of Anesthesiology, Surgical ICU & Pain Management, Cairo University

Fatma A Mohamed Hassan, M.B.B.Ch.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Resident of Anesthesia, Surgical ICU & Pain Management

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Kareem MA Nawwar, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

+201003878369

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Kareem MA Nawwar, M.D.

Role: primary

+201003878369

Kareem Nawwar

Role: backup

+201003878369

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

MS-492-2023

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.