Analgesic Effect of Bupivacaine Plus Ketamine Versus Bupivacaine Alone in Transversalis Fascia Plane Block

NCT ID: NCT06935669

Last Updated: 2025-04-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

68 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-04-25

Study Completion Date

2026-05-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy of transversalis fascia plane block using bupivacaine and ketamine versus bupivacaine alone for pain management after cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cesarean section (CS) is one of the most common surgeries and usually causes moderate to severe pain for up to 48 h. The rate of CS, which is a life-saving surgical procedure in cases of certain complications that occur during pregnancy and birth, has exceeded 20% worldwide Pain control after CS has crucial importance, especially in the first 24 h, to facilitate early ambulation and the establishment of breastfeeding. Insufficient analgesia in the postoperative period may cause a number of undesirable effects, such as patient discomfort, thromboembolism due to extended immobilization, and increased pulmonary secretions resulting in complications The well-known side effects of analgesic morphine as nausea, vomiting, itching and sedation, may interfere with the interaction between mother and child, breastfeeding and post-partum experience in a dose-dependent manner. However, a number of alternative strategies have been described in order to reduce morphine consumption post-operatively .

The mode and type of analgesia should be safe and effective. A stimulus caused by a lesion in tissue or organs during surgery is the cause of postoperative pain .

The primary source of pain after abdominal surgeries, including CS, are the anterior abdominal wall and abdominal viscera, and blocking these areas could provide proper postoperative analgesia .

Recently, the application of fascial plane blocks has increased due to the widespread use of ultrasound among anesthesiologists and the avoidance of opioids in a multimodal analgesic strategy. Different regional anesthetic techniques have been introduced, including ilioinguinal nerve blocks, abdominal field blocks, Transversalis Fascia Plane (TFP) blocks, and Transversus Abdominis Plane (TAP) blocks to alleviate pain from the abdominal wall incision .

Transversalis Fascia Plane, performed in the posterior axillary line, blocks branches of L1 nerve roots, including ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves. This method has been used to control postoperative pain in patients undergoing different lower abdominal surgeries A variety of anesthetic agents such as bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine are commonly used in TAP blocks. These drugs provide short-term analgesia and primarily alleviate somatic pain. To extend the duration of analgesic efficacy, various adjuvants such as opioids, ketamine, clonidine, and alpha-2 agonists like dexmedetomidine have been added .

Bupivacaine is one of the widely used local analgesics. ketamine affects pain modulation through multiple mechanisms of action. It is a non-competitive N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, which exerts an anti-hyperalgesic effect by decreasing central sensitization and reducing the wind-up phenomenon in the postoperative period .

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of transversalis fascia plane block using bupivacaine plus ketamine on postoperative pain compared to bupivacaine alone in patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ketamine and bupivacaine

Transversalis fascia plane block

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ketamine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients in this group will receive a transversalis fascia plane block using a combination of bupivacaine and ketamine.

Bupivacain

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients in this group will receive a transversalis fascia plane block using a combination of bupivacaine and ketamine.

Bupivacaine alone

Transversalis fascia plane block

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Control group to evaluate the additional effect of ketamine in the experimental arm.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ketamine

Patients in this group will receive a transversalis fascia plane block using a combination of bupivacaine and ketamine.

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine

Control group to evaluate the additional effect of ketamine in the experimental arm.

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacain

Patients in this group will receive a transversalis fascia plane block using a combination of bupivacaine and ketamine.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ketalar Marcaine Marcaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aging ≥ 21 years to ≤ 45.
* Patients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical statusphysical status classes II.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient's refusal of procedure or participation in the study.
* Coagulopathy and bleeding disorders.
* Use of chronic pain medications.
* Pregnancy-induced hypertension or diabetes.
* Evidence of Local skin infections at site of injection.
* Body mass index \>40kg/m2
* A history of relevant local anesthetic allergy.
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ain Shams University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

AHMED Ad Elgamal

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Ain Shams University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ain Shams University faculty of medicine

Cairo, Egypt, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ahmed Ad MAHMOUD Ebrahim elgamal

Role: CONTACT

+02 01159008254

Eman Sh Abdelmaqsoud

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ain Shams University faculty of medicine Ain Shams Universit faculty of medicine

Role: primary

02 26837673

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hassan, Shamsul Kamaruljan, et al. "Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety of bupivacaine plus ketamine versus bupivacaine alone in rectus sheath block for midline laparotomy." Anaesthesia, Pain & Intensive Care 27.2 (2023): 154-160.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

FMASU MD36/2025

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Bupivacaine Infiltration and Postoperative Pain
NCT04728308 UNKNOWN EARLY_PHASE1