Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
EARLY_PHASE1
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-10
2021-04-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Wound Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine v Plain Bupivacaine for Post-Op Pain Control in Elective Cesarean Delivery
NCT03353363
Intra Incisional Infiltration of Bupivacaine Versus Meloxicam on Post Cesarean Section Pain Relief
NCT04538391
Efficacy of Bupivacain Local Infiltration for the Management of Pain During Cesarean Section
NCT05404490
Bupivacaine Verus Pethidine for Post Cesarean Section Pain Relief
NCT03652116
Comparison of Intrathecal Bupivacaine With and Without Morphine for Post-operative Analgesia in Parturients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT07094802
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Introduction:
Over the last several decades, the rate of caesarean has increased rapidly.According to the data collected from 150 countries, almost 18.6% of the total births occur by caesareansection, with rates ranging from 6% to 27% in different regions. In Egypt and Turkey, the rate of caesarean section is more than 50%. In Pakistan, caesarean section rate was found to be 15.8% in 2013, with a rate of 11.5% in rural areas and 25.6% in the urban population.
Caesarean section is the most commonly performed surgical procedure nowadays and is associated with moderate to severe pain after the surgery. Pain after caesarean section occurs due to inadvertent damage to parietal peritoneum and nerve supply of skin.According to a survey done in America in 2003, it was found that upto 70% of the patients will experience severe pain postoperatively. Severe pain after caesarean section specifically affects mother-baby bonding, lactation, and patient recovery. It also leads to a prolonged hospital stay, reduced mobility, and consequently increasing the risk of thromboembolic disease in the postoperative period. Severe pain aftercaesarean delivery has also been found to be associated with postnatal depression and pain persisting after 8 weeks of delivery.Incaesarean delivery, the provision of effective postoperative analgesia is of key importance to facilitate early ambulation and infant care. It is also very important that the type of analgesia providedis safe, effective,and has minimal side effects for the mother and her baby.
The most appropriate method of analgesia for postoperative pain after caesarean section remains uncertain.Different methods have been used for this purpose. Parenteral opioids are the most commonly used method but associated nausea, vomiting, sedation, and risk of respiratory depression in mother and baby limits its use. Continuous epidural analgesia or patient-controlled analgesia also provide effective analgesia and have fewer adverse effects butare expensive and require special equipment and expertise.Infiltration of local anesthetic into subcutaneous tissue around the incision site has also been thought to relieve pain after caesarean section. Local anesthetic drugslike lignocaine and bupivacaine inhibit nerve impulses from the site of injury thus providing an analgesic effect. However,in this regard, there is no consistent evidence.Some studies show high efficacy while others report no benefit.
This study is being conducted to assess the effectiveness of wound infiltration of 20ml of 0.5% bupivacaine after the caesarean section on postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirement. If found effective this regimen can be implemented locally as it is cheap and simple to use.
Method: This will be a a double-blind randomized controlled trial. It is being conducted at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Pak Emirates Military Hospital from 10th January 2020 and will be completed till 10th april 2021. Pregnant women at term, with ages between 20 to 40 years, who are planned to undergo elective caesarean section, will included in the study. Patients are divided into two groups by a computer-generated lottery method. In group A, 20 ml of sterile water is infiltrated in the subcutaneous tissue around the incision site while 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine injection is infiltrated in patients of group B. The primary outcome measure is to asses the difference in postoperative pain among the two groups in terms of average pain score measure with help of visual analogue scale (VAS) and total dose of analgesia required in the first twenty four hours after the surgery. Secondary outcome is the average duration of hospital stay in patients of the two groups All the data will be entered and analyzed with help of SPSS version 16. For quantitative variables like mean pain score, average dose of opioid required, and average duration of hospital stay, the investigators will calculate mean and standard deviation and for qualitative variables like indication of the caesarean section, frequency and percentage will be calculated. To compare the quantitative variables between the two groups, unpaired T-test and for comparison of qualitative variables, chi-square test will be used. A p-value of \<0.05 will be considered significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
20ml of 0.5% bupivacaine is infiltrated in the subcutaneous tissue around the incision site
Bupivacain
Before closing the skin incision,Infiltration of 20ml of 0.5% bupivacaine around incision site will be done in the patients of experimental group and 20 ml of distill water will be infiltrated in the pateints of the placebo group
Placebo group
20 ml of distill water is infiltrated in the subcutaneous tissue around the incision site
Bupivacain
Before closing the skin incision,Infiltration of 20ml of 0.5% bupivacaine around incision site will be done in the patients of experimental group and 20 ml of distill water will be infiltrated in the pateints of the placebo group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Bupivacain
Before closing the skin incision,Infiltration of 20ml of 0.5% bupivacaine around incision site will be done in the patients of experimental group and 20 ml of distill water will be infiltrated in the pateints of the placebo group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
20 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Armed Forces Hospital, Pakistan
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
arshad khushdil
Dr Arshad Khushdil
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Madiha Ahmed
Islamabad, , Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
A/28/EC/232/2021
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.