The Effects of Scalp Block With Bupivacaine Versus Levobupivacaine

NCT ID: NCT02497040

Last Updated: 2018-01-05

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

90 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2008-03-31

Study Completion Date

2009-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ninety American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification system I-II patients were recruited for a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study and were randomly divided into three groups to receive either 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine (Group B; n=30), 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine (Group L; n=30) or saline as a placebo (Group C; n=30). Scalp block was performed 5 min before head pinning. The primary outcome of the study was mean arterial pressure (MAP) and secondary outcomes were heart rate (HR), visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, additional intraoperative and postoperative drug use. Postoperative pain was evaluated using a 10-cm visual analogue scale (VAS).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Following approval from the Research Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Uludağ University, (the date and protocol number assigned by this ethics committee were March 4, 2008 and 5/30, respectively),written informed consent was obtained from patients undergoing elective scheduled operations involving craniotomy during anaesthesia consultations. Ninety American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification system I or II patients of either sex between 18-85 years of age were allocated to this randomised, prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. The patients were randomly divided into three groups using a sealed-enveloped technique to receive either 20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine (Group B (n=30)), 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine (Group L (n=30)) or saline as a placebo (Group C (n=30)). Twenty-millilitre syringes for the block were prepared and numbered by a blinded assistant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertension

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

bupivacaine,levobupivacaine

20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine 20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Levobupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

local injection

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

local injection

levobupivacaine

20 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine saline as a placebo

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Levobupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

local injection

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

local injection

bupivacaine

20 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine saline as a placebo

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

local injection

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

local injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Levobupivacaine

local injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine

local injection

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

local injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

chirocaine marcaine saline

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status classification system 1-2

Exclusion Criteria

* Uncontrolled hypertension, arrhythmia, diabetes mellitus or coagulopathy, coronary artery disease or a proven or suspected allergy to bupivacaine or levobupivacaine
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Uludag University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

banu otlar can

anesthesia and reanimation

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

hulya bilgin

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

uludag university anaesthesia and reanimation department

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Pinosky ML, Fishman RL, Reeves ST, Harvey SC, Patel S, Palesch Y, Dorman BH. The effect of bupivacaine skull block on the hemodynamic response to craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 1996 Dec;83(6):1256-61. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199612000-00022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8942596 (View on PubMed)

Agarwal A, Sinha PK, Pandey CM, Gaur A, Pandey CK, Kaushik S. Effect of a subanesthetic dose of intravenous ketamine and/or local anesthetic infiltration on hemodynamic responses to skull-pin placement: a prospective, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2001 Jul;13(3):189-94. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200107000-00002.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11426091 (View on PubMed)

Costello TG, Cormack JR, Mather LE, LaFerlita B, Murphy MA, Harris K. Plasma levobupivacaine concentrations following scalp block in patients undergoing awake craniotomy. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Jun;94(6):848-51. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei135. Epub 2005 Apr 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15817709 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

uludagu

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Regional Analgesia After Cesarean Section
NCT03244540 COMPLETED PHASE4
Heavy Bupivacaine in Peribulbar Block
NCT03312959 UNKNOWN PHASE4
Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine in Liver Surgery
NCT05153785 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3
Cranial Blocks for Postoperative Anesthesia
NCT04749797 TERMINATED PHASE4