Liposomal Bupivacaine vs Peripheral Nerve Block

NCT ID: NCT03922620

Last Updated: 2023-02-23

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

1 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-01-23

Study Completion Date

2021-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Liposomal bupivacaine has gained interest in recent literature for its potential to be an effective adjunct to other pain control modalities in a multi-modal approach to post-operative pain control. The goal of this investigation is to compare the efficacy of local administration of liposomal bupivacaine versus the efficacy of a peripheral nerve block in terms of post-operative pain scores after elective ankle and hindfoot surgery. The investigators hypothesize that there will not be a significant difference in the pain scores of these two groups in opioid naïve patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Liposomal bupivacaine has gained interest in recent literature for its potential to be an effective adjunct to other pain control modalities in a multi-modal approach to post-operative pain control. Liposomal bupivacaine is an analgesic that is suspended in lipids to allow for gradual release of the analgesic over a 72-hour period (NAMDARI). From prior literature, the utilization of local analgesics infiltrated into surgical sites have been shown to reduce pain in the immediate post-operative period in foot and ankle surgery (GADEK). However, the evaluation of liposomal bupivacaine in foot and ankle surgery is limited. One prospective study found that the addition to liposomal bupivacaine to a multi-modal pain management protocol for forefoot surgery resulted in decreased pain scores during the first four post-operative days as well as fewer refills of opioid pain medication prescriptions, although both findings were not statically significant (ROBBINS). As the general medical community and public policy makers continue to focus on decreasing the amount of opioid pain medications prescribed and available in the community due to the opioid epidemic, liposomal bupivacaine has the potential to be a useful adjunct in the management of post-operative pain without reliance on opioid prescriptions. The goal of this investigation is to compare the efficacy of local administration of liposomal bupivacaine versus the efficacy of a peripheral nerve block in terms of post-operative pain scores after elective ankle and hindfoot surgery. The investigators hypothesize that there will not be a significant difference in the pain scores of these two groups in opioid naïve patients. Furthermore, this study aims to determine if there are differences in the amount of opioid medications utilized for post-operative pain control, patient satisfaction scores, functional outcomes, complications, and unscheduled healthcare contact between the two groups. In order to accomplish these aims, a randomized, controlled investigation will be conducted.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Acute Surgery Anesthesia Opioid Use

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Group

No peripheral nerve block will be given. Local infiltration of 20cc of Liposomal Bupivacaine infiltrated to the surgical area.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Liposomal bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Local infiltration of 20cc of Liposomal Bupivacaine infiltrated to the surgical area

Peripheral Nerve Block Group

Peripheral Nerve Block performed by anesthesia team (blocks will be given by same anesthesia provider utilizing same technique every time in order to reduce variations in delivery of peripheral nerve block). No local analgesic agent infiltration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Peripheral Nerve Block

Intervention Type DRUG

Peripheral Nerve Block performed by anesthesia team (blocks will be given by same anesthesia provider utilizing same technique every time in order to reduce variations in delivery of peripheral nerve block).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Liposomal bupivacaine

Local infiltration of 20cc of Liposomal Bupivacaine infiltrated to the surgical area

Intervention Type DRUG

Peripheral Nerve Block

Peripheral Nerve Block performed by anesthesia team (blocks will be given by same anesthesia provider utilizing same technique every time in order to reduce variations in delivery of peripheral nerve block).

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients 18 years of age or older
2. Patients undergoing elective primary ankle or hindfoot surgery (ankle arthrodesis, subtalar arthrodesis, triple arthrodesis, total ankle arthroplasty, peroneal tendon debridement/transfer, Cavus Reconstruction, Medial Displacement Calcaneal Osteotomy, Dwyer Osteotomy)

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients who are undergoing revision surgical procedure
2. Patients who have taken opioid pain medications in the past 3 months prior to surgical procedure
3. Patients who have allergies to any of the medications or components of medications investigated in the study
4. Patients currently incarcerated
5. Patients who cannot read and speak English
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Geisinger Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gerard Cush, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Geisinger Clinic

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Geisinger Woodbine

Danville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-0486

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.