Crisis Response Planning in Military Personnel With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT ID: NCT07327567
Last Updated: 2026-01-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2026-12-31
2027-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Validation of Cognitive Enhancement Techniques for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT04245124
Executive Dysfunction & Suicide: An Exploration Of Risk Factors In Traumatically Brain Injured Veterans
NCT01118195
Executive Function Training Intervention for Chronic Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT03704116
Mobile Intervention for Suicidal Thoughts
NCT06593379
Brain Health & Wellness Classes for Veterans With Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT06150196
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Specific Aims:
Aim 1: Determine the effectiveness of Crisis Response Planning (CRP) versus Treatment as Usual (TAU) on impulsivity and cognitive-affective states among military personnel with a diagnosis of mTBI.
Aim 2: Understand associations between impulsivity and cognitive-affective states among military personnel with a diagnosis of mTBI.
Aim 3: Determine if mTBI features (e.g., loss of consciousness duration, total number of lifetime TBIs, injury type) influence treatment outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm 1: Crisis Response Planning (CRP)
One 30-60-minute session delivered individually using in-person or telehealth format by a trained behavioral health provider.
Crisis Response Planning
The CRP intervention consists of a single 30-60-minute session. The CRP intervention includes a narrative assessment of the participant's most recent emotional crisis experience in order to understand and facilitate the participants understanding of their suicide mode.
Arm 2: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
Participants will receive the standard of care treatment as usual (TAU) from the Intrepid Spirit Center interdisciplinary treatment team that includes nurse practitioners, social workers, neurologists, and psychologists.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Crisis Response Planning
The CRP intervention consists of a single 30-60-minute session. The CRP intervention includes a narrative assessment of the participant's most recent emotional crisis experience in order to understand and facilitate the participants understanding of their suicide mode.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of at least one mTBI
* Ability to read, write, and speak English
* Owns and regularly uses an Apple iPhone or Android smartphone
Exclusion Criteria
* Moderate or greater cognitive impairment as indicated by evaluation by the Intrepid Spirit Center clinical team.
* Completed a Crisis Response Plan within the past year.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hannah Tyler
Chief of Psychology, Strong Star
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hannah Tyler, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center
Fort Hood, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Scot Engel, PsyD
Role: backup
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bryan CJ. A Preliminary Validation Study of Two Ultra-Brief Measures of Suicide Risk: The Suicide and Perceived Burdensomeness Visual Analog Scales. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2019 Apr;49(2):343-352. doi: 10.1111/sltb.12447. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
Di Benedetto M, Lindner H, Hare DL, Kent S. A Cardiac Depression Visual Analogue Scale for the brief and rapid assessment of depression following acute coronary syndromes. J Psychosom Res. 2005 Oct;59(4):223-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.06.070.
Huang Z, Kohler IV, Kampfen F. A Single-Item Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Measure for Assessing Depression Among College Students. Community Ment Health J. 2020 Feb;56(2):355-367. doi: 10.1007/s10597-019-00469-7. Epub 2019 Sep 17.
Kertzman S, Aladjem Z, Milo R, Ben-Nahum Z, Birger M, Grinspan H, Weizman A, Kotler M. The utility of the Visual Analogue Scale for the assessment of depressive mood in cognitively impaired patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004 Aug;19(8):789-96. doi: 10.1002/gps.1141.
Bryan CJ, David Rudd M, Wertenberger E, Etienne N, Ray-Sannerud BN, Morrow CE, Peterson AL, Young-McCaughon S. Improving the detection and prediction of suicidal behavior among military personnel by measuring suicidal beliefs: an evaluation of the Suicide Cognitions Scale. J Affect Disord. 2014 Apr;159:15-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.02.021. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
Nock MK, Holmberg EB, Photos VI, Michel BD. Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview: development, reliability, and validity in an adolescent sample. Psychol Assess. 2007 Sep;19(3):309-17. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.309.
Gratch I, Fernandes SN, Bell KA, Pollak OH, Fox KR, Tezanos K, Ebo T, Cha CB. Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised (SITBI-R): Reliability, Validity, and Inter-Informant Agreement in an Adolescent Sample. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2022 Jul-Aug;51(4):484-494. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2021.1901229. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
Fox KR, Harris JA, Wang SB, Millner AJ, Deming CA, Nock MK. Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised: Development, reliability, and validity. Psychol Assess. 2020 Jul;32(7):677-689. doi: 10.1037/pas0000819. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HT94252410714
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
STUDY00001922
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.