Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Ropivacaine for Preperitoneal Infiltration Analgesia in Upper Abdominal Laparotomy

NCT ID: NCT07271979

Last Updated: 2025-12-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

146 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-31

Study Completion Date

2026-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Upper abdominal open surgery is associated with significant trauma, and postoperative pain management poses considerable challenges. The inflammatory response triggered by peritoneal incision and the transmission of visceral pain via the vagus nerve are key components of "surgical stress" and pain. A potential intervention strategy involves the local administration of anesthetic agents to suppress peritoneal overreaction and block the cascade of pro-inflammatory cytokines in related nerves. Liposomal bupivacaine, as a long-acting local anesthetic, may provide more prolonged postoperative analgesia compared to ropivacaine. Therefore, this trial aims to prospectively compare the analgesic efficacy and anti-inflammatory effects of the two drugs when administered as pre-closure preperitoneal infiltration. Secondary endpoints include opioid consumption, complication rates, and postoperative recovery indicators, to comprehensively evaluate their clinical value.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal open surgery often experience moderate to severe postoperative pain, which not only hinders early recovery but also significantly impairs their quality of life. Ideal postoperative analgesia requires a balance between efficacy and safety, and preperitoneal local anesthetic administration serves as an effective strategy to achieve this goal. Compared to conventional local anesthetics, liposomal bupivacaine-as a novel sustained-release formulation-enables continuous drug release, extending the analgesic duration to 48-72 hours. This study aims to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of preperitoneal injection of liposomal bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in patients undergoing upper gastrointestinal open surgery.

This study employs a randomized controlled design. Participants will be stratified based on the type of surgical incision (midline or subcostal) and randomized into groups using a computer-generated random seed with permuted block randomization (variable block sizes of 2, 4, and 6). Prior to abdominal closure during surgery, the experimental group will receive liposomal bupivacaine injections into the preperitoneal space on both sides of the wound, while the control group will receive ropivacaine injections. Apart from this intervention, both groups will maintain identical protocols for anesthesia induction, maintenance, and postoperative systemic analgesia to accurately evaluate the relative efficacy of the two local analgesic agents.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Liposomal Bupivacaine Preperitoneal Infiltration Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Liposomal bupivacaine

Prior to abdominal closure, the subject received a preperitoneal administration of liposomal bupivacaine at the surgical incision site. The total injection dose did not exceed 266 mg. A volume of 1 ml of the drug solution was administered per 1.5 cm of wound length per side.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Liposomal bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Upon abdominal closure following upper gastrointestinal open surgery, liposomal bupivacaine is administered preperitoneally along the surgical incision and diluted with normal saline according to the incision length.

ropivacaine

Prior to abdominal closure, the subject received a preperitoneal administration of 0.3% ropivacaine at the surgical incision site. A volume of 1 ml of the drug solution was administered per 1.5 cm of wound length per side.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Prior to abdominal closure following upper gastrointestinal open surgery, ropivacaine is administered preperitoneally at the surgical incision site and diluted with normal saline to a concentration of 0.3%.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Liposomal bupivacaine

Upon abdominal closure following upper gastrointestinal open surgery, liposomal bupivacaine is administered preperitoneally along the surgical incision and diluted with normal saline according to the incision length.

Intervention Type DRUG

ropivacaine

Prior to abdominal closure following upper gastrointestinal open surgery, ropivacaine is administered preperitoneally at the surgical incision site and diluted with normal saline to a concentration of 0.3%.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Aged between 18 and 70 years.
2. Scheduled for elective upper gastrointestinal open surgery.
3. Surgical approach involving either a subcostal or midline incision.
4. Incision length between 15 and 30 cm.
5. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification of I to III.

Exclusion Criteria

1. ASA Physical Status Class greater than III.
2. Pre-existing chronic pain with long-term opioid use (for \>1 year).
3. Significant hepatic or renal impairment, or underweight status, defined as:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of \<40 mL/min/1.73m²; Child-Pugh Class C; Body Mass Index (BMI) \<18.5 kg/m².
4. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to the investigational drug or any of its excipients.
5. Pregnancy or lactation
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jinying Zhang

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jinying Zhang

Role: CONTACT

18560087707

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Othman AH, Ahmed DG, Abd El-Rahman AM, El Sherif FA, Mansour S, Aboeleuon E. Effect of Preperitoneal Versus Epidural Analgesia on Postoperative Inflammatory Response and Pain Following Radical Cystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. Clin J Pain. 2019 Apr;35(4):328-334. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000679.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30829734 (View on PubMed)

Colibaseanu DT, Osagiede O, Merchea A, Ball CT, Bojaxhi E, Panchamia JK, Jacob AK, Kelley SR, Naessens JM, Larson DW. Randomized clinical trial of liposomal bupivacaine transverse abdominis plane block versus intrathecal analgesia in colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2019 May;106(6):692-699. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11141. Epub 2019 Mar 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30919948 (View on PubMed)

Pedrazzani C, Park SY, Conti C, Turri G, Park JS, Kim HJ, Polati E, Guglielmi A, Choi GS. Analgesic efficacy of pre-emptive local wound infiltration plus laparoscopic-assisted transversus abdominis plane block versus wound infiltration in patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal resection: results from a randomized, multicenter, single-blind, non-inferiority trial. Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3329-3338. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07771-6. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32632489 (View on PubMed)

Gasanova I, Alexander J, Ogunnaike B, Hamid C, Rogers D, Minhajuddin A, Joshi GP. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Surgical Site Infiltration for Pain Management After Open Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. Anesth Analg. 2015 Nov;121(5):1383-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000909.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26252171 (View on PubMed)

Beaussier M, El'Ayoubi H, Schiffer E, Rollin M, Parc Y, Mazoit JX, Azizi L, Gervaz P, Rohr S, Biermann C, Lienhart A, Eledjam JJ. Continuous preperitoneal infusion of ropivacaine provides effective analgesia and accelerates recovery after colorectal surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Anesthesiology. 2007 Sep;107(3):461-8. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000278903.91986.19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17721249 (View on PubMed)

Tawfik MM, Mohamed YM, Elbadrawi RE, Abdelkhalek M, Mogahed MM, Ezz HM. Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Wound Infiltration for Analgesia After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg. 2017 Apr;124(4):1291-1297. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001724.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27984230 (View on PubMed)

Teo ZHT, Tey BLJ, Foo CW, Wong WY, Low JK. Intraoperative Celiac Plexus Block With Preperitoneal Infusion Reduces Opioid Usage in Major Hepato-pancreato-biliary Surgery: A Pilot Study. Ann Surg. 2021 Jul 1;274(1):e97-e99. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004883.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33856374 (View on PubMed)

Ozer A, Yilmazlar A, Ozturk E, Yilmazlar T. Preperitoneal catheter analgesia is an effective method for pain management after colorectal surgery: the results of 100 consecutive patients. Local Reg Anesth. 2014 Oct 9;7:53-7. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S71476. eCollection 2014.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25336988 (View on PubMed)

Alexander JC, Sunna M, Goldenmerry Y, Mootz A, O'Connor C, Ringqvist J, Bunker M, Joshi GP, Gasanova I. Comparison of transversus abdominis plane blocks with liposomal bupivacaine versus ropivacaine in open total abdominal hysterectomy. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 Jun 30;35(6):746-750. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2090798. eCollection 2022.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36304627 (View on PubMed)

Ben-Saghroune H, Abdessadek M, Achour S, Kfal Y, El Bouazzaoui A, Kanjaa N, Sbai H. Assessment of the Safety and Efficiency of a Preperitoneal Continuous Infusion Using Bupivacaine after Abdominal Laparotomy in Digestive Carcinology. Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2023 Oct 10;2023:8842393. doi: 10.1155/2023/8842393. eCollection 2023.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37854305 (View on PubMed)

Rawal N. Current issues in postoperative pain management. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 Mar;33(3):160-71. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000366.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26509324 (View on PubMed)

Sammour T, Kahokehr A, Soop M, Hill AG. Peritoneal damage: the inflammatory response and clinical implications of the neuro-immuno-humoral axis. World J Surg. 2010 Apr;34(4):704-20. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0382-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20049432 (View on PubMed)

Baeriswyl M, Zeiter F, Piubellini D, Kirkham KR, Albrecht E. The analgesic efficacy of transverse abdominis plane block versus epidural analgesia: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Jun;97(26):e11261. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011261.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29952997 (View on PubMed)

Ozturk E, Yilmazlar A, Coskun F, Isik O, Yilmazlar T. The beneficial effects of preperitoneal catheter analgesia following colon and rectal resections: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Tech Coloproctol. 2011 Sep;15(3):331-6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-011-0720-6. Epub 2011 Jul 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21769617 (View on PubMed)

Joshi GP, Machi A. Surgical site infiltration: A neuroanatomical approach. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Sep;33(3):317-324. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.07.017. Epub 2019 Jul 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31785717 (View on PubMed)

Mungroop TH, Bond MJ, Lirk P, Busch OR, Hollmann MW, Veelo DP, Besselink MG. Preperitoneal or Subcutaneous Wound Catheters as Alternative for Epidural Analgesia in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):252-260. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002817.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29781846 (View on PubMed)

Perniola A, Fant F, Magnuson A, Axelsson K, Gupta A. Postoperative pain after abdominal hysterectomy: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing continuous infusion vs patient-controlled intraperitoneal injection of local anaesthetic. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Feb;112(2):328-36. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet345. Epub 2013 Oct 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24185607 (View on PubMed)

Mungroop TH, Veelo DP, Busch OR, van Dieren S, van Gulik TM, Karsten TM, de Castro SM, Godfried MB, Thiel B, Hollmann MW, Lirk P, Besselink MG. Continuous wound infiltration versus epidural analgesia after hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery (POP-UP): a randomised controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Oct;1(2):105-113. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30012-7. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28404067 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KYLL-202507-101-2

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Optimizing Recovery in Abdominoplasty
NCT04254692 TERMINATED PHASE4