Study to Compare Reduction in Pain After Surgery With and Without Local Anesthesia During Laparoscopy

NCT ID: NCT01452633

Last Updated: 2013-06-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-11-30

Study Completion Date

2014-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will help to answer the question, "Does injecting local anesthetic before laparoscopic instrument ports are placed decrease pain after surgery?" Patients participating will be randomly assigned to receive local anesthetic or saline injection at the site of a laparoscopic instrument port as part of their planned surgery. After surgery at 4 and 24 hours the patient will be asked to rate their pain on a simple chart.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The literature is divided on the efficacy of preincisional local analgesia injections at laparoscopic port sites to decrease post operative pain. One reason for this lack of a clear conclusion is the fact that prior studies included small and large port sizes. Many small port sites have little pain associated with them so showing a reduction with medicine is statistically difficult. The investigators have noted that larger, lateral port sites which require fascial closure are the sites that patients consistently note pain at. Our protocol will include the use of 0.25% marcaine injections at all the surgical ports other than the large lateral port used for gynecologic laparoscopy. Patients would then be randomized and surgeons would be blinded as to which patients receive the marcaine or a saline injection at the large lateral port site. Visual analog pain scales will be assessed at 4 and 24 hours after surgery. An additional two arms have been added to include 50 patients randomized to 0.25% marcaine or saline injection just prior to incisional closure in the absence of any preincisional intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post Operative Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Preincision Placebo

This group of patients will receive saline injection at study port site before incision

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Saline will be injected at the study port site prior to incision

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection will precede incision

Preincision Marcaine

This group will receive marcaine injection at the study port site prior to incision

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.25% bupivicaine will be injected at the study port site prior to incision

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection will precede the incision

Postincision Placebo

This group of patients will receive preincisional marcaine and then saline injection at study port site prior to closure

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

0.25% bupivicaine will be injected at the study port site prior to incision

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection will precede the incision

Saline will be in injected into the port site prior to closure

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline will be injected into the port site prior to the closure without any preincisional intervention

Postincision marcaine

This group will receive preincisional marcaine and then marcaine injection at study port site prior to closure

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.25% bupivicaine will be injected at the study port site prior to incision

Intervention Type DRUG

Injection will precede the incision

0.25% bupivicaine will be injected into the port site prior to closure

Intervention Type DRUG

0.25% bupivicaine will be injected into the port site at closure without any preincisional intervention

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

0.25% bupivicaine will be injected at the study port site prior to incision

Injection will precede the incision

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline will be injected at the study port site prior to incision

Injection will precede incision

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline will be in injected into the port site prior to closure

Saline will be injected into the port site prior to the closure without any preincisional intervention

Intervention Type DRUG

0.25% bupivicaine will be injected into the port site prior to closure

0.25% bupivicaine will be injected into the port site at closure without any preincisional intervention

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

marcaine normal saline marcaine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery

Exclusion Criteria

* Cardiovascular instability
* malignancies
* pulmonary conditions incompatible with laparoscopic surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stony Brook University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

James Droesch

Associate Professor, Obsterics/Gynecology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

James N Droesch, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Stony Brook University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Stony Brook University Medical Center

Stony Brook, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

James N Droesch, MD

Role: primary

631-444-2757

Todd Griffin, MD

Role: backup

6314442757

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

241577-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.