Intra-Peritoneal Local Anaesthesia After Cytoreductive Surgery

NCT ID: NCT02256228

Last Updated: 2019-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-10-31

Study Completion Date

2017-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Can perioperative administration of intra-peritoneal local anaesthetics further reduce postoperative pain, inflammation and outcome in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (cytoreductive surgery) and managed with thoracic epidural analgesia? - Multicenter study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to measure the efficacy of local anesthetics (LA) administered into the intra-peritoneal cavity compared to placebo. Our hypothesis is that the injection of local LAs intra-peritoneally would reduce post-operative pain and the inflammatory process caused by the massive release of cytokines during extensive cytoreductive surgery. The study is a controlled, parallel group, double blind, prospective, randomized and performed at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Goteborg, Sweden . Twenty mL of ropivacaine or saline would be injected every hour by an automatic pump via the intra-peritoneal catheter into the abdomen according to group randomization in order to double blind patients and all personnel involved in the study.

The parameters that would be evaluated are inflammatory markers, postoperative morbidity, pain intensity, consumption of morphine, cognitive function and progression-free survival.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group R

Ropivacaine is instillated through one multi-hole catheter wich would be inserted percutaneously in all patients and tunnelled about 1-2 cm lateral to the abdominal incision and the tip of the catheter placed in the intra-peritoneal cavity. The catheter would not be ligated and fixed in situ intra-peritoneally. Twenty ml of Ropivacaine would be injected subcutaneously along both sides of the incision prior to skin closure. Additionally, 20 ml of Ropivacaine (1mg/mL) would be injected every hour by an automatic pump via the intra-peritoneal catheter into the abdomen.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Active Group

Group P

Saline is instillated through one multi-hole catheter wich would be inserted percutaneously in all patients and tunnelled about 1-2 cm lateral to the abdominal incision and the tip of the catheter placed in the intra-peritoneal cavity. The catheter would not be ligated and fixed in situ intra-peritoneally. Twenty ml of Saline would be injected subcutaneously along both sides of the incision prior to skin closure. Additionally, 20 ml of Saline would be injected every hour by an automatic pump via the intra-peritoneal catheter into the abdomen.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo Comparator

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ropivacaine

Active Group

Intervention Type DRUG

Saline

Placebo Comparator

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Narop Sodium Chloride

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- Patients with widespread malignant intra-abdominal ovary cancer stadium III-IV and are operated by extensive resection of intra-abdominal viscera as well as the parietal peritoneum (cytoreductive surgery, CRS)

Exclusion Criteria

* Body mass index \> 35
* American Society of Anesthesiologists classification \> 3
* Renal dysfunction
* Allergic to acetylsalicylic acid
* Unwilling to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

74 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Göteborg University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sven-Egron Thorn, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Dept. of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden

Anil Gupta, MD PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Dept. of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Orebro University Hospital, Orebro, Sweden

Sven-Erik Ricksten, MD PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Dept. of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dept. of Gynecological Surgery and Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Gothenburg, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hayden JM, Oras J, Block L, Thorn SE, Palmqvist C, Salehi S, Nordstrom JL, Gupta A. Intraperitoneal ropivacaine reduces time interval to initiation of chemotherapy after surgery for advanced ovarian cancer: randomised controlled double-blind pilot study. Br J Anaesth. 2020 May;124(5):562-570. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.01.026. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32172954 (View on PubMed)

Hayden J, Gupta A, Thorn SE, Thulin P, Block L, Oras J. Does intraperitoneal ropivacaine reduce postoperative inflammation? A prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Sep;63(8):1048-1054. doi: 10.1111/aas.13410. Epub 2019 Jun 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31206591 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IPLA-CRS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine in Liver Surgery
NCT05153785 COMPLETED PHASE2/PHASE3