Ropivacaine Use Intraincisionally Versus Intraperitoneally for Post-Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pain

NCT ID: NCT03265223

Last Updated: 2017-08-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

353 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-04-01

Study Completion Date

2017-08-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pain still remains a limiting factor in early discharge of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Almost all earlier studies done to compare the efficacy of local anaesthetics used intraperitoneally as compared to intraincisionally used equal amounts of drugs at the two locations, usually 10-20 ml. Using this large amount of drug in the small space of intraincisional location as compared to similar amount of drug in large intraperitoneal space created an inadvertent bias in favor of patients receiving the drug intraincisionally so such patients naturally experienced less pain. The investigators decided to standardize the drug used at these two locations as 1ml/cm and conduct a new study comparing the effects of drugs in relieving pain when used at these two locations.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aims \& Objectives: To conduct a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study by standardizing dose of local anesthetic, to compare the effectiveness of intraperitoneal against intraincisional use of ropivacaine 0.2% for post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain relief.

Materials \& Methods: American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II patients underwent elective 4 port laparoscopic cholecystectomy by a single surgeon. Anesthetic and surgical techniques were standardized. Patients were randomized using envelope method into 3 groups according to location of drug use. Triple blinding was ensured and envelopes were opened only at the completion of study. All patients received \~23 ml of solution, of which 20 ml was given intraperitoneally \[1 ml/cm; 16 ml along right hemi-dome, approximately equal to length of right hemi-dome of diaphragm in an average adult and 4 ml in gall bladder fossa) and \~3 ml intraincisionally (1 ml/cm of length of incision). Controls (n=86) received \~23 ml normal saline (20 ml intraperitoneally and 1 ml/cm intraincisionally) while the intraperitoneal group (n=100) received 20 ml of intraperitoneal instillation of injection ropivacaine 0.2% and 1 ml/cm of normal saline intraincisionally at the end of procedure. Intraincisional group (n=108) received 20 ml normal saline intraperitoneally and 1 ml/cm of injection ropivacaine 0.2% infiltration at incisional site at the end of procedure. All patients received injection diclofenac sodium 75mg/1ml (aqueous) intravenously 12 hourly postoperatively. 5 different pain scales were used for assessment of overall pain. Pain scores were assessed at 5 points of time, that is, at 0.5, 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively. Shoulder pain and extra dose of analgesic required (rescue analgesia) were also recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ropivacaine Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Three study groups: Controls received no drug, intraperitoneal group received drug along right hemidiaphragm and in gallbladder fossa while intraincisional group received drug by infiltration at trocar site
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators
Triple blinding was done i.e. neither the operating surgeon nor the investigator and nor the patient knew to which study group patient belong to.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intraincisional group

Received 20 ml of normal saline intraperitoneally (1 ml/cm; 16 ml along right hemi-dome, approximately equal to length of right hemi-dome of diaphragm in an average adult and 4 ml in gall bladder fossa) and 3 ml 0.2% ropivacaine (1ml/cm of port site incision length)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.2% ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Intraperitoneal instillation versus intraincisional infiltration

Controls

Received 1 ml/cm normal saline (23 ml) both at intraperitoneal (=20 ml) as well as intraincisional (=3 ml) location.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Intraperitoneal group

Received 20 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine intraperitoneally (1 ml/cm; 16 ml along right hemi-dome, approximately equal to length of right hemi-dome of diaphragm in an average adult and 4 ml in gall bladder fossa) and 3 ml normal saline (1ml/cm of port site incision length)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.2% ropivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

Intraperitoneal instillation versus intraincisional infiltration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

0.2% ropivacaine

Intraperitoneal instillation versus intraincisional infiltration

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ropin Naropin

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients in the age group of 15-80 years
* Patients conferring to Grade I or II of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification system only
* Patients undergoing elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
* Patients having symptomatic cholelithiasis only
* Patients operated by a single surgeon were included.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with known allergic reactions to local anesthetics
* Cases that were converted to open cholecystectomy
* Patients with major intra-operative complications
* Patients suffering from acute cholecystitis, empyema or malignancy of gall bladder, having history of chronic pain or those taking frequent analgesics or opioids pre-operatively
* Patients with peptic ulceration, bleeding disorders, impaired renal and/or hepatic function, and sensitivity to NSAIDs or opioids.
* Patients in whom gall bladder (GB) stones are found incidentally on ultrasonography (USG) (asymptomatic cholelithiasis)
* Patients suffering from severe chronic medical diseases and morbid obesity
* Patients unable to comprehend instructions or having communication problems were excluded from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kaushal Deep Singh

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Kaushal D Singh, MS Surgery

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

JawaharlalNMC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain Reduction After Cholecystectomy
NCT01199406 COMPLETED PHASE4