Restorative Neurophysiology: Backing up and Restoring the Brain (BandR)

NCT ID: NCT07252011

Last Updated: 2025-12-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-01

Study Completion Date

2029-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Study to examine the extent to which neurophysiological states recorded for a specific person on one day can be induced on a subsequent day

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study will be a single-arm design. It involves a longitudinal design in which subjective, physiological, and brain reactivity will be measured on 3 occasions, between \~2 weeks and \~4 months apart. The first assessment will be on a subjectively "good" day (mood rating above 7/10). The second will be on a subjectively "bad" day (mood rating below 3/10) and the third will be within a week of the second session. At the second and third sessions, participants will work to "restore" their brain state to that of the first assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Adults With Variability in Their Mood

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Recall + Stimulation + Neurofeedback

Participants will be given their subjective ratings and notes from the first session and asked to recreate how they were feeling at their first session during recall-only blocks. In addition, during neurofeedback and stimulation blocks, they will be given access to technologies for restoring neurophysiological features from the first assessment, including their 1) brain state, 2) facial muscle activity, and 3) heart rate variability. They will be provided with this information and asked to match their previous recordings during the neurofeedback blocks, and stimulated using Transcranial alternating current stimulation (TACS), electromyography (EMG), and vibroacoustic stimulation during the stimulation blocks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Intervention Type DEVICE

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a widely used non-invasive brain stimulation method. The concept underlying alternating current is to simulate the naturally occurring rhythmic pattern of electrophysiological activity of the brain, which can be detected by electroencephalography (EEG). It involves the application of electrodes onto the scalp, which deliver sinusoidal alternating electric currents.

Neuro/biofeedback

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be shown their their brain EEG recordings and parameters from vocal recordings from their "backup" day, and asked to attempt to use behavioral strategies to match the recording

Recall

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will be given their subjective ratings and notes from a journaling interval to use as a target to restore their mood to how they were feeling on the Visit 1 backup day

Physiological stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Facial electrical stimulation, and chest-worn vibroacoustic stimulation will be used to affect facial muscle activity and peripheral physiology to better approximate previously assessed states.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a widely used non-invasive brain stimulation method. The concept underlying alternating current is to simulate the naturally occurring rhythmic pattern of electrophysiological activity of the brain, which can be detected by electroencephalography (EEG). It involves the application of electrodes onto the scalp, which deliver sinusoidal alternating electric currents.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Neuro/biofeedback

Participants will be shown their their brain EEG recordings and parameters from vocal recordings from their "backup" day, and asked to attempt to use behavioral strategies to match the recording

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Recall

Participants will be given their subjective ratings and notes from a journaling interval to use as a target to restore their mood to how they were feeling on the Visit 1 backup day

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Physiological stimulation

Facial electrical stimulation, and chest-worn vibroacoustic stimulation will be used to affect facial muscle activity and peripheral physiology to better approximate previously assessed states.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults age 18-65
* have periods of good and bad moods each lasting at least 2 days

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal or inability to provide informed consent
* People who report being in frank psychotic episodes or who say they are unable to stay off psychoactive substances during assessments will be excluded. Because we do not want to return participants to manic states, individuals with bipolar I disorder who report being or appear to be in a manic state at their baseline assessment will also be excluded.
* Inability to complete questionnaires written in English. The justification is that many of the primary analyses involve assessment of change in self-reported symptoms using measures normed in English. Participants must thus be able to read those measures to give valid indications of the extent to which they have responded to the intervention.
* Chronic pain that could be exacerbated by electrical stimulation
* Having difficulties in corrected vision or hearing which would prevent efficient processing of the experimental stimuli
* Having a North American Adult Reading Test (NAART) equivalent full scale IQ \< 85
* History of a convulsive disorder
* Presence of any neurologic disorder or medication therapy known to decrease seizure threshold (e.g., brain injury, frequent/severe headaches).
* Participants deemed "not a good fit" for the study for other reasons (such as, but not limited to, continually arriving late or rescheduling, not being a trustworthy historian or accurate reporter of symptoms, being belligerent with study staff, or presenting an active suicide risk) can also be excluded.
* Heart condition
* Current severe Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-V) alcohol or substance use disorder, with the exception of nicotine or caffeine. Clinician will access subjects' alcohol and substance use on a case-by-case to determine whether specific cases of mild or moderate alcohol or substance use would also interfere with the effects of the intervention.
* Those who have metal implants in the vicinity of stimulated areas, or who have electrical implants (e.g., pacemakers, vagus nerve stimulator) will be excluded out of an abundance of caution regarding the safety of electrical stimulation.
* Any metal implant or subcutaneous metal in the face or head
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Greg Siegle

Professor of Psychiatry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Greg Siegle

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Greg Siegle

Role: CONTACT

412-864-3501

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Greg Siegle

Role: primary

412-648-6179 ext. 412-864-3501

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY25020073

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Brain, Emotions, and Mind-Wandering
NCT05345392 RECRUITING NA