Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
WITHDRAWN
Clinical Phase
NA
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2026-08-01
Study Completion Date
2027-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Brain stimulation is a means to potentially remediate symptoms in a range of neurological and psychiatric diseases, however, precise targeting of stimulation is necessary to ensure efficacy. The proposed project will use recent advances in functional magnetic resonance imaging to delineate distributed brain networks within individuals, and use these network maps to guide selection of intracranial electrodes for stimulation during an episodic memory task. The resulting data will refine the current understanding of the neural systems involved in episodic memory, and provide a proof-of-principle for the use of individual-level network mapping to guide brain stimulation, which could have important implications for brain stimulation therapies for a range of mental health disorders.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Causal Role of Brain Networks in Episodic Memory
NCT05374551
Episodic Memory
Healthy
RECRUITING
NA
Epilepsy in Alzheimer's Disease: Effect on Disease Progression
NCT04131491
Mild Cognitive Impairment
Alzheimer Disease
UNKNOWN
NA
Study of Brain Anatomo-functional Substrates Related to the Use of Human Tool by Means of Simultaneous Acquisition of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Electroencephalogram
NCT05767489
Patients With Frontal and Parietal Lobe Dysfunction
UNKNOWN
Cortical Excitability in Post-traumatic Epilepsy
NCT05517954
Traumatic Brain Injury
Cortical Excitability
Epilepsy
UNKNOWN
Reinstatement of Context During Sleep and Its Subsequent Effect on Memory: an fMRI Study
NCT04702724
Sleep
Consolidation
COMPLETED
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Research Statement SIGNIFICANCE Memory impairments are common to several neurological and psychiatric disorders, including Alzheimer's disease and depression, and these impose a heavy burden on patients, families and society (Dickerson and Eichenbaum, 2007). Novel treatment and diagnostic strategies are needed, and these may arise from a deeper understanding of the brain basis of episodic memory (Tulving, 1983).
Group-averaged neuroimaging studies have revealed that a distributed network, known as the 'default network' (DN), increases activity during the recollection of past events (Buckner et al. 2008). This network occupies regions including posteromedial cortex (PMC), posterior parietal cortex (PPC), and the medial temporal lobe (MTL), as well as lateral temporal and lateral and medial prefrontal cortices. Building on recent advances in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI; Poldrack et al., 2015; Laumann et al., 2015), recent evidence has shown that when functional anatomy is defined in individuals, the DN comprises at least two juxtaposed networks, named DN-A and DN-B for convenience (Figure 1). This finding forces us to reconsider the role of the DN in episodic processes (see also: Dastjerdi et al., 2011; Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010). Here we propose experiments to deepen our understanding of these networks using a multimodal approach that provides high spatiotemporal resolution and whole-brain network definition. We will combine within-individual fMRI mapping with intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) and electrical brain stimulation (EBS). We will directly record local field potentials from precisely mapped network regions, and apply electrical stimulation with millimeter precision. This will provide novel information regarding episodic memory in two domains that cannot be gathered by fMRI alone: i) characterizing fast temporal dynamics of network recruitment during episodic recollection, and ii) establishing causal interactions between brain regions during recollection.
INNOVATION Methodologically, this project will provide proof of principle that precision fMRI mapping can be performed in a clinical population and successfully combined with invasive recordings and stimulation. Theoretical innovation will be obtained through a deeper understanding of the task-response dynamics, coupling, and causal relationships between regions of distributed networks, including how neural engagement changes during memory recollection. Finally, this proposal provides translational innovation by directly testing whether precision-fMRI guided intracranial stimulation can be used modulate memory performance.
APPROACH General methods: Participants in the proposed experiments will be neurosurgical patients with presumed focal epilepsy that are to undergo implantation with intracranial electrodes for localizing seizure foci. The proposal will be carried out at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. Patients scheduled for intracranial seizure monitoring will be invited to enroll in the study and will undergo 1 to 4 sessions of fMRI prior to surgical implantation of electrodes. After surgery, patients are typically monitored for \~7 days in the Northwestern Memorial Hospital Comprehensive Epilepsy Centre (CEC), during which they will be invited to participate in the proposed experiments. All subjects must provide informed consent before participating.
Enrollment: A minimum of 40-50 patients are expected to be monitored at the CEC over the next 3 years. Electrode locations are determined by the clinical needs of the patient. 60-70% of patients are typically implanted with dense coverage of the medial temporal lobes achieved through depth electrodes with trajectories that allow sampling of lateral temporal cortices. A small number of electrodes are also typically implanted in posterior cingulate, lateral inferior parietal and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Due to the distributed nature of the networks under investigation, which contain regions in multiple cortical zones, it is likely that we will have coverage over relevant brain regions in many cases. Some patients are also likely to be implanted with broader cortical coverage using subdural grids. Preliminary results have shown that even when a patient is implanted only with depth electrodes, which are not placed on the cortical surface but penetrate into the brain, coverage of different candidate network regions was often achieved along the electrode trajectory. With conservative estimates, 20-30 subjects will be good candidates for the project aims outlined below. Given the high signal-to-noise ratio of iEEG (usually a 200-300% task-evoked increase in signal from baseline; Parvizi and Kastner, 2017), reliable effects can typically be found within individuals. All proposed analyses will be carried out within individuals, hence multiple subjects are required to generalize the findings, not increase statistical power. Therefore, a small number of subjects (as low as n = 12) would be sufficient (e.g. Braga and Buckner, 2017; Foster et al., 2013).
Neuroimaging acquisition: MR scans will be collected in 1-4 sessions from each patient. Preliminary data has shown that in this clinical population 2-3 MRI sessions are desirable to allow exclusion of non-compliant runs (e.g. those containing excess head motion). We will collect 6-8 runs of fMRI data per session, resulting in between 42 - 224 mins of fMRI data per patient. This will allow robust and reliable estimates of network topography. Subject sleepiness will be monitored through an in-scanner eye-tracking camera. Compliance may be improved by allowing patients to watch movies inside the scanner when needed, with pilot analyses showing comparable maps are obtained using movie and visual fixation task data. Hence both tasks will be administered to improve compliance.
Network definition within individuals: Networks will be defined within individuals using two methods to ensure robustness. MRI preprocessing will be performed using a custom pipeline 'iProc' that optimizes within-subject alignment and minimizes blurring. Individual seed regions will be hand-selected and correlation maps will be thresholded at r \> 0.2 to remove regions of low certainty. The networks of interest, DN-A and DN-B, will be targeted and identified using the expected anatomical distribution of each network (described in detail in Braga and Buckner, 2017). Once candidate seed regions are selected, definition of networks will be performed again in each individual using data-driven clustering, which reduces potential experimenter bias. Networks from the clustering analysis that most closely match up with the networks defined by hand will be selected and labelled as DN-A and DN-B. Network maps will be used to label electrode contacts (each 'electrode' can have multiple 'contacts' along its shaft or grid) by their approximate location within or near each network.
Electrode localization: Electrode locations will be determined using a computerized tomography (CT) scan. Estimates of the center of each contact in CT space will be obtained using BioImage Suite. The CT image will be registered to the anatomical T1 image (containing brain tissue locations) using a linear transform, allowing coordinates of each contact to be projected to the T1 space. Preliminary data has shown that the inter-rater error in this localization process is typically \~1mm. A 2-mm radius sphere will be generated centered on each contact coordinate to approximate the sampling volume of each contact, which is extended due to tissue conductance. Contacts that are predominantly sampling white matter will be removed by excluding contacts whose sphere does not overlap with the gray matter ribbon (estimated using FreeSurfer). The overlap between spheres and gray matter will be used for surface-based and volume-based functional connectivity (FC) analyses. FC maps will be created for each contact, and the resulting maps will be visualized. If a contact fails to produce a FC map with distant regions of high correlation (indicating that the contact is sampling a distributed network), the contact will be excluded. If the contact's FC map resembles DN-A and DN-B, as defined using the clustering and manually defined seed-based analyses, this contact will be labelled as sampling DN-A and DN-B and included for further analysis. Two nearby electrodes, one situated in DN-A and one in DN-B, will be selected a priori in two different cortical zones (e.g. PMC vs. PPC, based on coverage).
iEEG processing: All contacts within the epileptic zone or corrupted by external noise will be removed from further analysis. Raw signals will be notch filtered at 60, 120 and 180 Hz to remove electrical noise and harmonics. Notch-filtered signals will be re-referenced by subtracting the common average, after removal of pathogenic or spiky signals, as well as those presenting as clear outliers in power spectra plots. Data will be bandpass filtered to extract amplitude and phase information at different frequency bands. The high-frequency broadband (HFB; 70-140 Hz) signal is an important surrogate for local neuronal population activity and corresponds to low-frequency correlations of the blood oxygenation-level dependent signal (Logothetis et al., 2001). HFB band-limited power will be calculated and low-pass filtered at \<0.1 Hz. Pair-wise correlations in HFB power will be used to estimate functional connectivity.
Direct cortical stimulation: Risks associated with the research stimulation protocol are considered incremental and are further reduced by carrying out the stimulation under supervision of a clinical researcher, when patients are on antiepileptic medication, and keeping stimulation to within safety limits. Low frequency (1 Hz) single pulse stimulation will be applied to regions of DN-A and DN-B to map cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs). This will be used to estimate the strength, as well as provide data on the directionality of connections between regions. In a departure from original plans, based on recent findings (Hermiller et al. 2019), theta-burst stimulation (gamma-band stimulation applied intermittently at theta frequencies) will be applied to regions of DN-A regions in lateral temporal, posteromedial and prefrontal cortices during a recollection task to test if stimulation of distant DN-A regions can lead to improvements in hippocampus-mediated episodic memory recollection. Currents will be administered at a threshold below that which causes after-discharges (usually around 6-8 mA).
Group-averaged neuroimaging studies have revealed that a distributed network, known as the 'default network' (DN), increases activity during the recollection of past events (Buckner et al. 2008). This network occupies regions including posteromedial cortex (PMC), posterior parietal cortex (PPC), and the medial temporal lobe (MTL), as well as lateral temporal and lateral and medial prefrontal cortices. Building on recent advances in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI; Poldrack et al., 2015; Laumann et al., 2015), recent evidence has shown that when functional anatomy is defined in individuals, the DN comprises at least two juxtaposed networks, named DN-A and DN-B for convenience (Figure 1). This finding forces us to reconsider the role of the DN in episodic processes (see also: Dastjerdi et al., 2011; Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010). Here we propose experiments to deepen our understanding of these networks using a multimodal approach that provides high spatiotemporal resolution and whole-brain network definition. We will combine within-individual fMRI mapping with intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) and electrical brain stimulation (EBS). We will directly record local field potentials from precisely mapped network regions, and apply electrical stimulation with millimeter precision. This will provide novel information regarding episodic memory in two domains that cannot be gathered by fMRI alone: i) characterizing fast temporal dynamics of network recruitment during episodic recollection, and ii) establishing causal interactions between brain regions during recollection.
INNOVATION Methodologically, this project will provide proof of principle that precision fMRI mapping can be performed in a clinical population and successfully combined with invasive recordings and stimulation. Theoretical innovation will be obtained through a deeper understanding of the task-response dynamics, coupling, and causal relationships between regions of distributed networks, including how neural engagement changes during memory recollection. Finally, this proposal provides translational innovation by directly testing whether precision-fMRI guided intracranial stimulation can be used modulate memory performance.
APPROACH General methods: Participants in the proposed experiments will be neurosurgical patients with presumed focal epilepsy that are to undergo implantation with intracranial electrodes for localizing seizure foci. The proposal will be carried out at the Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. Patients scheduled for intracranial seizure monitoring will be invited to enroll in the study and will undergo 1 to 4 sessions of fMRI prior to surgical implantation of electrodes. After surgery, patients are typically monitored for \~7 days in the Northwestern Memorial Hospital Comprehensive Epilepsy Centre (CEC), during which they will be invited to participate in the proposed experiments. All subjects must provide informed consent before participating.
Enrollment: A minimum of 40-50 patients are expected to be monitored at the CEC over the next 3 years. Electrode locations are determined by the clinical needs of the patient. 60-70% of patients are typically implanted with dense coverage of the medial temporal lobes achieved through depth electrodes with trajectories that allow sampling of lateral temporal cortices. A small number of electrodes are also typically implanted in posterior cingulate, lateral inferior parietal and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Due to the distributed nature of the networks under investigation, which contain regions in multiple cortical zones, it is likely that we will have coverage over relevant brain regions in many cases. Some patients are also likely to be implanted with broader cortical coverage using subdural grids. Preliminary results have shown that even when a patient is implanted only with depth electrodes, which are not placed on the cortical surface but penetrate into the brain, coverage of different candidate network regions was often achieved along the electrode trajectory. With conservative estimates, 20-30 subjects will be good candidates for the project aims outlined below. Given the high signal-to-noise ratio of iEEG (usually a 200-300% task-evoked increase in signal from baseline; Parvizi and Kastner, 2017), reliable effects can typically be found within individuals. All proposed analyses will be carried out within individuals, hence multiple subjects are required to generalize the findings, not increase statistical power. Therefore, a small number of subjects (as low as n = 12) would be sufficient (e.g. Braga and Buckner, 2017; Foster et al., 2013).
Neuroimaging acquisition: MR scans will be collected in 1-4 sessions from each patient. Preliminary data has shown that in this clinical population 2-3 MRI sessions are desirable to allow exclusion of non-compliant runs (e.g. those containing excess head motion). We will collect 6-8 runs of fMRI data per session, resulting in between 42 - 224 mins of fMRI data per patient. This will allow robust and reliable estimates of network topography. Subject sleepiness will be monitored through an in-scanner eye-tracking camera. Compliance may be improved by allowing patients to watch movies inside the scanner when needed, with pilot analyses showing comparable maps are obtained using movie and visual fixation task data. Hence both tasks will be administered to improve compliance.
Network definition within individuals: Networks will be defined within individuals using two methods to ensure robustness. MRI preprocessing will be performed using a custom pipeline 'iProc' that optimizes within-subject alignment and minimizes blurring. Individual seed regions will be hand-selected and correlation maps will be thresholded at r \> 0.2 to remove regions of low certainty. The networks of interest, DN-A and DN-B, will be targeted and identified using the expected anatomical distribution of each network (described in detail in Braga and Buckner, 2017). Once candidate seed regions are selected, definition of networks will be performed again in each individual using data-driven clustering, which reduces potential experimenter bias. Networks from the clustering analysis that most closely match up with the networks defined by hand will be selected and labelled as DN-A and DN-B. Network maps will be used to label electrode contacts (each 'electrode' can have multiple 'contacts' along its shaft or grid) by their approximate location within or near each network.
Electrode localization: Electrode locations will be determined using a computerized tomography (CT) scan. Estimates of the center of each contact in CT space will be obtained using BioImage Suite. The CT image will be registered to the anatomical T1 image (containing brain tissue locations) using a linear transform, allowing coordinates of each contact to be projected to the T1 space. Preliminary data has shown that the inter-rater error in this localization process is typically \~1mm. A 2-mm radius sphere will be generated centered on each contact coordinate to approximate the sampling volume of each contact, which is extended due to tissue conductance. Contacts that are predominantly sampling white matter will be removed by excluding contacts whose sphere does not overlap with the gray matter ribbon (estimated using FreeSurfer). The overlap between spheres and gray matter will be used for surface-based and volume-based functional connectivity (FC) analyses. FC maps will be created for each contact, and the resulting maps will be visualized. If a contact fails to produce a FC map with distant regions of high correlation (indicating that the contact is sampling a distributed network), the contact will be excluded. If the contact's FC map resembles DN-A and DN-B, as defined using the clustering and manually defined seed-based analyses, this contact will be labelled as sampling DN-A and DN-B and included for further analysis. Two nearby electrodes, one situated in DN-A and one in DN-B, will be selected a priori in two different cortical zones (e.g. PMC vs. PPC, based on coverage).
iEEG processing: All contacts within the epileptic zone or corrupted by external noise will be removed from further analysis. Raw signals will be notch filtered at 60, 120 and 180 Hz to remove electrical noise and harmonics. Notch-filtered signals will be re-referenced by subtracting the common average, after removal of pathogenic or spiky signals, as well as those presenting as clear outliers in power spectra plots. Data will be bandpass filtered to extract amplitude and phase information at different frequency bands. The high-frequency broadband (HFB; 70-140 Hz) signal is an important surrogate for local neuronal population activity and corresponds to low-frequency correlations of the blood oxygenation-level dependent signal (Logothetis et al., 2001). HFB band-limited power will be calculated and low-pass filtered at \<0.1 Hz. Pair-wise correlations in HFB power will be used to estimate functional connectivity.
Direct cortical stimulation: Risks associated with the research stimulation protocol are considered incremental and are further reduced by carrying out the stimulation under supervision of a clinical researcher, when patients are on antiepileptic medication, and keeping stimulation to within safety limits. Low frequency (1 Hz) single pulse stimulation will be applied to regions of DN-A and DN-B to map cortico-cortical evoked potentials (CCEPs). This will be used to estimate the strength, as well as provide data on the directionality of connections between regions. In a departure from original plans, based on recent findings (Hermiller et al. 2019), theta-burst stimulation (gamma-band stimulation applied intermittently at theta frequencies) will be applied to regions of DN-A regions in lateral temporal, posteromedial and prefrontal cortices during a recollection task to test if stimulation of distant DN-A regions can lead to improvements in hippocampus-mediated episodic memory recollection. Currents will be administered at a threshold below that which causes after-discharges (usually around 6-8 mA).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Episodic Memory
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
NA
Intervention Model
SINGLE_GROUP
All participants will receive theta-burst stimulation and sham stimulation, meaning that each participant will be their own control.
Primary Study Purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention and Control group
Each patient will receive electrical and sham stimulation, meaning that each patient will act as their own control.
Group Type
OTHER
Brain stimulation
Intervention Type
OTHER
Theta-burst stimulation will be applied to selected regions of distributed networks to test whether distal stimulation can modulate hippocampus-mediated episodic recollection.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Brain stimulation
Theta-burst stimulation will be applied to selected regions of distributed networks to test whether distal stimulation can modulate hippocampus-mediated episodic recollection.
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Adults legally unable to provide informed consent
2. Individuals who are not yet adults (children below the age of 18)
3. Pregnant women
4. Prisoners To help determine eligibility for the MRI portion of the study, a safety questionnaire will be administered by research staff prior to receiving an MRI. Answers to these questions are used to determine whether subjects meet any of the exclusionary criteria listed next. Exclusions for MRI include standard MRI contraindications, including claustrophobia, metal implants or fragments in the body, and actual or potential pregnancy.
2. Individuals who are not yet adults (children below the age of 18)
3. Pregnant women
4. Prisoners To help determine eligibility for the MRI portion of the study, a safety questionnaire will be administered by research staff prior to receiving an MRI. Answers to these questions are used to determine whether subjects meet any of the exclusionary criteria listed next. Exclusions for MRI include standard MRI contraindications, including claustrophobia, metal implants or fragments in the body, and actual or potential pregnancy.
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Northwestern University
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rodrigo M Braga, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Northwestern University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Site Status
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
United States
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Tulving, E. (1983) Elements of episodic memory. Oxford. Clarendon Press ; New York : Oxford University Press. xi, 351 p. p.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dickerson BC, Eichenbaum H. The episodic memory system: neurocircuitry and disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Jan;35(1):86-104. doi: 10.1038/npp.2009.126.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Buckner RL, Andrews-Hanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain's default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008 Mar;1124:1-38. doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.011.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Poldrack RA, Laumann TO, Koyejo O, Gregory B, Hover A, Chen MY, Gorgolewski KJ, Luci J, Joo SJ, Boyd RL, Hunicke-Smith S, Simpson ZB, Caven T, Sochat V, Shine JM, Gordon E, Snyder AZ, Adeyemo B, Petersen SE, Glahn DC, Reese Mckay D, Curran JE, Goring HH, Carless MA, Blangero J, Dougherty R, Leemans A, Handwerker DA, Frick L, Marcotte EM, Mumford JA. Long-term neural and physiological phenotyping of a single human. Nat Commun. 2015 Dec 9;6:8885. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9885.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Laumann TO, Gordon EM, Adeyemo B, Snyder AZ, Joo SJ, Chen MY, Gilmore AW, McDermott KB, Nelson SM, Dosenbach NU, Schlaggar BL, Mumford JA, Poldrack RA, Petersen SE. Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain. Neuron. 2015 Aug 5;87(3):657-70. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.06.037. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Andrews-Hanna JR, Reidler JS, Sepulcre J, Poulin R, Buckner RL. Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain's default network. Neuron. 2010 Feb 25;65(4):550-62. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.005.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Braga RM, Buckner RL. Parallel Interdigitated Distributed Networks within the Individual Estimated by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity. Neuron. 2017 Jul 19;95(2):457-471.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.038.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Dastjerdi M, Foster BL, Nasrullah S, Rauschecker AM, Dougherty RF, Townsend JD, Chang C, Greicius MD, Menon V, Kennedy DP, Parvizi J. Differential electrophysiological response during rest, self-referential, and non-self-referential tasks in human posteromedial cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Feb 15;108(7):3023-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1017098108. Epub 2011 Jan 31.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
DiNicola LM, Braga RM, Buckner RL. Parallel distributed networks dissociate episodic and social functions within the individual. J Neurophysiol. 2020 Mar 1;123(3):1144-1179. doi: 10.1152/jn.00529.2019. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Foster BL, Kaveh A, Dastjerdi M, Miller KJ, Parvizi J. Human retrosplenial cortex displays transient theta phase locking with medial temporal cortex prior to activation during autobiographical memory retrieval. J Neurosci. 2013 Jun 19;33(25):10439-46. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0513-13.2013.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Foster BL, Parvizi J. Direct cortical stimulation of human posteromedial cortex. Neurology. 2017 Feb 14;88(7):685-691. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003607. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hebscher M, Voss JL. Testing network properties of episodic memory using non-invasive brain stimulation. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2020 Apr;32:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.01.012. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hermiller MS, VanHaerents S, Raij T, Voss JL. Frequency-specific noninvasive modulation of memory retrieval and its relationship with hippocampal network connectivity. Hippocampus. 2019 Jul;29(7):595-609. doi: 10.1002/hipo.23054. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Logothetis NK, Pauls J, Augath M, Trinath T, Oeltermann A. Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature. 2001 Jul 12;412(6843):150-7. doi: 10.1038/35084005.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Parvizi J, Kastner S. Promises and limitations of human intracranial electroencephalography. Nat Neurosci. 2018 Apr;21(4):474-483. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0108-2. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Suthana N, Haneef Z, Stern J, Mukamel R, Behnke E, Knowlton B, Fried I. Memory enhancement and deep-brain stimulation of the entorhinal area. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 9;366(6):502-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1107212.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wang L, Saalmann YB, Pinsk MA, Arcaro MJ, Kastner S. Electrophysiological low-frequency coherence and cross-frequency coupling contribute to BOLD connectivity. Neuron. 2012 Dec 6;76(5):1010-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.09.033.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STU00213066
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Brain Activity During Strategic Planning
NCT00728741
COMPLETED
Scrutinizing and Promoting Mindfulness Via New Technologies
NCT03148678
COMPLETED
NA
Rescuing the Ruminating Brain: Identifying Biomarkers of Rumination and Mindfulness Through Concurrent EEG and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) Studies of Schizophrenia and Depression
NCT03758495
WITHDRAWN
Feasibility Study of Deep Brain Recordings for Learning and Memory
NCT02417727
WITHDRAWN
Effects of GLYX-13 on Learning and Memory in Healthy Individuals and Those With Psychiatric Illness
NCT01844726
TERMINATED
PHASE2
Studying Motor Neuron Tests
NCT01517087
COMPLETED
BDNF and Motor Learning
NCT02074696
TERMINATED
Dopamine Receptor Imaging to Predict Response to Stimulant Therapy in Chronic TBI
NCT02148783
TERMINATED
PHASE2
Neuroimaging Study for Decoding Emotional States and Identifying Neural Circuits to Disengage From Negative Thinking
NCT06254144
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Investigating Electroencephalographic Predictors of Default Mode Network Anticorrelation in Healthy Adults
NCT05592600
COMPLETED
NA
Noninvasive Modulation of Motivational Brain Regions in Healthy Volunteers
NCT04972786
COMPLETED
NA
Compensatory Brain Mechanisms for Amygdala-associated Cognitive Dysfunction: Potential Role of the Cortical Mirror Neuron System
NCT03723733
UNKNOWN
Physiology of Interregional Connectivity in the Human Brain
NCT03723434
UNKNOWN
NA
Symptom Based Treatment Affects Brain Plasticity - Cognitive Training in Patients With Affective Symptoms
NCT03183947
COMPLETED
NA
Neuroendocrine Mapping of the Cerebral Cortex
NCT04183153
WITHDRAWN
NA
Measuring the Latency Connectome in the Central Nervous Systems Using Neuroimaging and Neurophysiological Techniques
NCT03223636
COMPLETED
A Study to Evaluate fMRI of Active DBS Stimulation in Epilepsy
NCT04753983
WITHDRAWN
NA
Cognitive Process-based Real-time fMRI Neurofeedback in MDD and Rumination
NCT04941066
COMPLETED
NA
Symptom Based Treatment Affects Brain Plasticity - the Role of Verbal Auditory Hallucinations
NCT02722915
COMPLETED
NA
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Brain in Emotional Processing
NCT00061204
COMPLETED
Modulation of the Parieto-frontal Communication
NCT03434093
WITHDRAWN
NA
Plasticity of the Compassionate Brain
NCT01833104
COMPLETED
NA
REsting and Stimulus-based Paradigms to Detect Organized NetworkS and Predict Emergence of Consciousness
NCT03504709
COMPLETED
Brain Connectivity in Neurodevelopmental Disorders in Response to Treatment
NCT01364818
COMPLETED
Investigation of Human Epileptic Networks by fMRI
NCT03582345
COMPLETED
NA