Velocity-Based Resistance Training and Motor Skills in University Athletes

NCT ID: NCT07249203

Last Updated: 2025-11-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-01-15

Study Completion Date

2024-04-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study investigated the effects of resistance training applied with a velocity-based approach on selected motor skills in university-level athletes. Participants were randomly assigned to two groups: a velocity-based training (VBT) group and a percentage-based training (PBT) group. Both groups performed lower-body resistance exercises over an 8-week period, three times per week. Pre- and post-training assessments were conducted for countermovement jump (CMJ), sprint (20 m and 40 m), agility (505 test), and one-repetition maximum (1RM) squat performance. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of VBT and PBT on jump, sprint, agility, and strength performance. It was hypothesized that the VBT group would show greater improvements in motor skills compared to the PBT group.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This randomized, parallel-group, interventional trial was designed to examine the effects of resistance training performed using a velocity-based approach on selected motor skills among trained university athletes.

A total of 20 male participants (aged 18-30 years) were randomly assigned into two groups:

Velocity-Based Training (VBT) group: performed squats, lunges, and similar lower-body exercises using individualized movement velocity feedback obtained from a linear encoder.

Percentage-Based Training (PBT) group: performed the same exercises based on traditional fixed-load percentages of one-repetition maximum (1RM).

Both training programs lasted 8 weeks and included three sessions per week. Pre- and post-tests included measurements of countermovement jump (CMJ) height and power, sprint times (20 m and 40 m), agility (505 test), and maximal squat strength (1RM).

The study was approved by the Istanbul Gelişim University Rectorate Ethics Committee (Approval No: 2024-01-144, Date: 12.01.2024) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.

The primary outcome of interest was the change in CMJ performance. Secondary outcomes included sprint, agility, and 1RM strength improvements.

The results are expected to contribute to the understanding of how velocity-based resistance training affects neuromuscular adaptations and physical performance in athletes compared to traditional percentage-based training methods.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Resistance Training Motor Performance Athletic Performance Velocity-based Training

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The study employed a parallel-group, randomized design. Participants were randomly assigned to either a percentage-based training (PBT) group or a velocity-based training (VBT) group. Both groups performed resistance training programs for 8 weeks, focusing on lower-body and upper-body exercises. The VBT group trained according to movement velocity feedback, while the PBT group followed loads based on fixed percentages of one-repetition maximum (1RM). Pre- and post-tests were conducted to evaluate changes in motor performance variables such as jump height, sprint time, and maximal strength.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Velocity-Based Training (VBT) Group

Participants in this group performed the same resistance training exercises as the PBT group, but the training load and volume were adjusted according to movement velocity feedback using a linear position transducer. The intervention lasted for 8 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Velocity-Based Training (VBT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The velocity-based training (VBT) group performed lower-body resistance exercises for 8 weeks, three sessions per week. Training loads were adjusted based on real-time barbell velocity feedback measured with a linear encoder. Exercises included squats, lunges, and other multi-joint movements. Each session focused on maintaining optimal movement speed for power development.

Percentage-Based Training (PBT) Group

Participants in this group performed a resistance training program based on fixed percentages of their one-repetition maximum (1RM). The training load was adjusted weekly according to percentage-based progression over 8 weeks.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Percentage-Based Training (PBT)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The percentage-based training (PBT) group performed the same resistance exercises as the VBT group for 8 weeks, three sessions per week. Training loads were prescribed according to a fixed percentage of each participant's one-repetition maximum (1RM). Exercises included squats, lunges, and other lower-body movements aimed at improving strength and power.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Percentage-Based Training (PBT)

The percentage-based training (PBT) group performed the same resistance exercises as the VBT group for 8 weeks, three sessions per week. Training loads were prescribed according to a fixed percentage of each participant's one-repetition maximum (1RM). Exercises included squats, lunges, and other lower-body movements aimed at improving strength and power.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Velocity-Based Training (VBT)

The velocity-based training (VBT) group performed lower-body resistance exercises for 8 weeks, three sessions per week. Training loads were adjusted based on real-time barbell velocity feedback measured with a linear encoder. Exercises included squats, lunges, and other multi-joint movements. Each session focused on maintaining optimal movement speed for power development.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male university athletes aged 18-35 years
* Regular participation in resistance training for at least 1 year
* Free from any musculoskeletal injuries during the last 6 months
* Willing to participate in all training sessions and testing procedures

Exclusion Criteria

* Current or recent musculoskeletal, neurological, or cardiovascular disorders
* Missed more than two training sessions during the study period
* Use of performance-enhancing drugs or supplements during the study
* Any medical condition that prevents participation in resistance training
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Istanbul Gelisim University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Serdar GÜR, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Istanbul Gelişim University, Faculty of Sports Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istanbul Gelişim University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://gelisim.edu.tr/

Istanbul Gelişim University official website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IGU-2024-01-144-VBT-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Effects of Muscle Fatigue
NCT07009496 COMPLETED NA