Velocity-Based Resistance Training and Motor Skills in University Athletes
NCT ID: NCT07249203
Last Updated: 2025-11-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-15
2024-04-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effects of Whole Body Vibration With Plyometric Training on Physical Performance in Basketball Players
NCT03291483
Single vs. Multiple-Set Resistance Training in Sedentary Men
NCT07337304
Resistance Training-induced Adaptations in Children
NCT07267429
The Effects of the Blood Flow Restriction Method on Performance Parameters in Elite Volleyball Players
NCT07019168
The Effect of Plyometric Training in Freestyle Adolescent Wrestlers
NCT06372808
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A total of 20 male participants (aged 18-30 years) were randomly assigned into two groups:
Velocity-Based Training (VBT) group: performed squats, lunges, and similar lower-body exercises using individualized movement velocity feedback obtained from a linear encoder.
Percentage-Based Training (PBT) group: performed the same exercises based on traditional fixed-load percentages of one-repetition maximum (1RM).
Both training programs lasted 8 weeks and included three sessions per week. Pre- and post-tests included measurements of countermovement jump (CMJ) height and power, sprint times (20 m and 40 m), agility (505 test), and maximal squat strength (1RM).
The study was approved by the Istanbul Gelişim University Rectorate Ethics Committee (Approval No: 2024-01-144, Date: 12.01.2024) and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent prior to participation.
The primary outcome of interest was the change in CMJ performance. Secondary outcomes included sprint, agility, and 1RM strength improvements.
The results are expected to contribute to the understanding of how velocity-based resistance training affects neuromuscular adaptations and physical performance in athletes compared to traditional percentage-based training methods.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Velocity-Based Training (VBT) Group
Participants in this group performed the same resistance training exercises as the PBT group, but the training load and volume were adjusted according to movement velocity feedback using a linear position transducer. The intervention lasted for 8 weeks.
Velocity-Based Training (VBT)
The velocity-based training (VBT) group performed lower-body resistance exercises for 8 weeks, three sessions per week. Training loads were adjusted based on real-time barbell velocity feedback measured with a linear encoder. Exercises included squats, lunges, and other multi-joint movements. Each session focused on maintaining optimal movement speed for power development.
Percentage-Based Training (PBT) Group
Participants in this group performed a resistance training program based on fixed percentages of their one-repetition maximum (1RM). The training load was adjusted weekly according to percentage-based progression over 8 weeks.
Percentage-Based Training (PBT)
The percentage-based training (PBT) group performed the same resistance exercises as the VBT group for 8 weeks, three sessions per week. Training loads were prescribed according to a fixed percentage of each participant's one-repetition maximum (1RM). Exercises included squats, lunges, and other lower-body movements aimed at improving strength and power.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Percentage-Based Training (PBT)
The percentage-based training (PBT) group performed the same resistance exercises as the VBT group for 8 weeks, three sessions per week. Training loads were prescribed according to a fixed percentage of each participant's one-repetition maximum (1RM). Exercises included squats, lunges, and other lower-body movements aimed at improving strength and power.
Velocity-Based Training (VBT)
The velocity-based training (VBT) group performed lower-body resistance exercises for 8 weeks, three sessions per week. Training loads were adjusted based on real-time barbell velocity feedback measured with a linear encoder. Exercises included squats, lunges, and other multi-joint movements. Each session focused on maintaining optimal movement speed for power development.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Regular participation in resistance training for at least 1 year
* Free from any musculoskeletal injuries during the last 6 months
* Willing to participate in all training sessions and testing procedures
Exclusion Criteria
* Missed more than two training sessions during the study period
* Use of performance-enhancing drugs or supplements during the study
* Any medical condition that prevents participation in resistance training
18 Years
35 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Istanbul Gelisim University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Serdar GÜR, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Istanbul Gelişim University, Faculty of Sports Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istanbul Gelişim University
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Istanbul Gelişim University official website
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IGU-2024-01-144-VBT-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.