Randomized Trial of Five Implant Osteotomy Protocols on Stability and Anxiety

NCT ID: NCT07234214

Last Updated: 2025-11-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-09-01

Study Completion Date

2023-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This clinical trial is studying different methods of preparing bone for dental implants. When a tooth is missing, a small titanium screw called a dental implant can be placed in the jaw to replace it. The stability of the implant during the first weeks after surgery is very important for long-term success.

In this study, 100 patients each received a single dental implant. They were randomly assigned to one of five surgical methods: drilling at 50, 300, or 800 revolutions per minute (rpm), bone densification using special burs, or bone condensation using condenser drills. The goal was to compare how these techniques affect implant stability, measured by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis, as well as the patient's anxiety before and after surgery.

This research aims to find which technique provides the best balance between bone healing and patient comfort. All participants were healthy adults, and the study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at Istanbul Aydın University, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, between 2019 and 2023. A total of 100 systemically healthy adults requiring a single dental implant in a healed edentulous ridge were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned (n = 20 per group) to one of five osteotomy protocols:

Sequential drilling at 50 rpm without irrigation

Sequential drilling at 300 rpm with irrigation

Sequential drilling at 800 rpm with irrigation

Osseodensification with densifying burs at 1200 rpm (counterclockwise, irrigated)

Bone condensation using condenser drills at 50 rpm (clockwise, non-irrigated, following pilot drilling)

The same tapered titanium implant system was used in all patients. Primary outcomes were insertion torque (Ncm) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) measured at placement and at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months. The secondary outcome was patient-reported anxiety assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS) pre- and postoperatively.

Bone density was evaluated preoperatively using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT, expressed as Hounsfield Unit Equivalents) and intraoperatively classified by Misch criteria. Patients with insertion torque \< 25 Ncm were excluded from stability analysis and allowed to heal submerged.

The trial followed the CONSORT statement and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained (IAU 2023/141). Results are expected to clarify whether moderate-speed drilling, high-speed drilling, ultra-low-speed drilling, or non-subtractive approaches (osseodensification, condensation) provide the most favorable outcomes in terms of implant stability and patient psychological response.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Osteotomy Protocols Dental Implant Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial comparing five different implant osteotomy techniques with respect to insertion torque, implant stability, and patient-reported anxiety.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
The surgeon could not be blinded due to the nature of the interventions. However, implant stability was measured by an independent assessor, and statistical analyses were performed by a blinded biostatistician.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

50 rpm - Ultra-low-speed drilling

Sequential osteotomy drilling at 50 rpm without irrigation, followed by implant placement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Osteotomy technique - 50 Rpm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultra-low-speed sequential drilling at 50 rpm without irrigation.

300 rpm - Moderate-speed drilling

Sequential osteotomy drilling at 300 rpm with external irrigation, followed by implant placement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Osteotomy technique - 300 Rpm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Moderate-speed sequential drilling at 300 rpm with irrigation.

800 Rpm - High-speed drilling

Sequential osteotomy drilling at 800 rpm with external irrigation, followed by implant placement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Osteotomy technique - 800 Rpm

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

High-speed sequential drilling at 800 rpm with irrigation.

DNS - Osseodensification

Osteotomy prepared with Densah® burs (Versah, USA) at 1200 rpm counterclockwise with irrigation, following pilot drilling.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Osteotomy technique - DNS (Osseodensification)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Osseodensification using Densah® burs at 1200 rpm counterclockwise with irrigation.

CDS - Bone condensation

Osteotomy prepared with condenser drills (Surgident, South Korea) at 50 rpm clockwise without irrigation, following pilot drilling at 800 rpm.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Osteotomy technique - CDS (Bone Condensation)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bone condensation with condenser drills at 50 rpm clockwise without irrigation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Osteotomy technique - 50 Rpm

Ultra-low-speed sequential drilling at 50 rpm without irrigation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Osteotomy technique - 300 Rpm

Moderate-speed sequential drilling at 300 rpm with irrigation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Osteotomy technique - 800 Rpm

High-speed sequential drilling at 800 rpm with irrigation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Osteotomy technique - DNS (Osseodensification)

Osseodensification using Densah® burs at 1200 rpm counterclockwise with irrigation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Osteotomy technique - CDS (Bone Condensation)

Bone condensation with condenser drills at 50 rpm clockwise without irrigation.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged 20-78 years
* Single-tooth healed edentulous ridge
* First-time implant candidates
* Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) available
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I
* Non-smokers or light smokers (\<10 cigarettes/day)
* Provided written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous grafting or sinus augmentation at the implant site, including socket grafting after extraction
* Systemic contraindications to implant surgery
* Intraoperative complications or postoperative infections
* Missing insertion torque (IT) or ISQ data
* Requirement for a submerged (two-stage) protocol
* Deviations from the standardized surgical protocol or implant system
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

78 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sercan Küçükkurt

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sercan Küçükkurt

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istanbul Aydın University, Faculty of Dentistry

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IAU Ethics Approval 2023/141

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

IAU-OMS-OSTEO-RCT-01

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.