Randomized Trial of Five Implant Osteotomy Protocols on Stability and Anxiety
NCT ID: NCT07234214
Last Updated: 2025-11-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
100 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-01
2023-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In this study, 100 patients each received a single dental implant. They were randomly assigned to one of five surgical methods: drilling at 50, 300, or 800 revolutions per minute (rpm), bone densification using special burs, or bone condensation using condenser drills. The goal was to compare how these techniques affect implant stability, measured by insertion torque and resonance frequency analysis, as well as the patient's anxiety before and after surgery.
This research aims to find which technique provides the best balance between bone healing and patient comfort. All participants were healthy adults, and the study was approved by the institutional ethics committee.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Thread Designs on Primary Stability of Dental Implant Using Osseodensification Technique in Posterior Maxilla : Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT07242716
Osseodensification Drills Versus Piezoelectric Surgery
NCT05410405
Evaluation of Osseointegration Process of Dental Implants
NCT06099834
Dental Implant Stability Placed in Healed Bony Sites Using Oversized Drilling Versus Conventional Drilling Protocol
NCT06917638
A Study of the Performance of Certain Prevail Implants Used in Short Fixed Cases
NCT00723944
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Sequential drilling at 50 rpm without irrigation
Sequential drilling at 300 rpm with irrigation
Sequential drilling at 800 rpm with irrigation
Osseodensification with densifying burs at 1200 rpm (counterclockwise, irrigated)
Bone condensation using condenser drills at 50 rpm (clockwise, non-irrigated, following pilot drilling)
The same tapered titanium implant system was used in all patients. Primary outcomes were insertion torque (Ncm) and implant stability quotient (ISQ) measured at placement and at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months. The secondary outcome was patient-reported anxiety assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS) pre- and postoperatively.
Bone density was evaluated preoperatively using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT, expressed as Hounsfield Unit Equivalents) and intraoperatively classified by Misch criteria. Patients with insertion torque \< 25 Ncm were excluded from stability analysis and allowed to heal submerged.
The trial followed the CONSORT statement and adhered to the Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained (IAU 2023/141). Results are expected to clarify whether moderate-speed drilling, high-speed drilling, ultra-low-speed drilling, or non-subtractive approaches (osseodensification, condensation) provide the most favorable outcomes in terms of implant stability and patient psychological response.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
50 rpm - Ultra-low-speed drilling
Sequential osteotomy drilling at 50 rpm without irrigation, followed by implant placement.
Osteotomy technique - 50 Rpm
Ultra-low-speed sequential drilling at 50 rpm without irrigation.
300 rpm - Moderate-speed drilling
Sequential osteotomy drilling at 300 rpm with external irrigation, followed by implant placement.
Osteotomy technique - 300 Rpm
Moderate-speed sequential drilling at 300 rpm with irrigation.
800 Rpm - High-speed drilling
Sequential osteotomy drilling at 800 rpm with external irrigation, followed by implant placement.
Osteotomy technique - 800 Rpm
High-speed sequential drilling at 800 rpm with irrigation.
DNS - Osseodensification
Osteotomy prepared with Densah® burs (Versah, USA) at 1200 rpm counterclockwise with irrigation, following pilot drilling.
Osteotomy technique - DNS (Osseodensification)
Osseodensification using Densah® burs at 1200 rpm counterclockwise with irrigation.
CDS - Bone condensation
Osteotomy prepared with condenser drills (Surgident, South Korea) at 50 rpm clockwise without irrigation, following pilot drilling at 800 rpm.
Osteotomy technique - CDS (Bone Condensation)
Bone condensation with condenser drills at 50 rpm clockwise without irrigation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Osteotomy technique - 50 Rpm
Ultra-low-speed sequential drilling at 50 rpm without irrigation.
Osteotomy technique - 300 Rpm
Moderate-speed sequential drilling at 300 rpm with irrigation.
Osteotomy technique - 800 Rpm
High-speed sequential drilling at 800 rpm with irrigation.
Osteotomy technique - DNS (Osseodensification)
Osseodensification using Densah® burs at 1200 rpm counterclockwise with irrigation.
Osteotomy technique - CDS (Bone Condensation)
Bone condensation with condenser drills at 50 rpm clockwise without irrigation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Single-tooth healed edentulous ridge
* First-time implant candidates
* Preoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) available
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I
* Non-smokers or light smokers (\<10 cigarettes/day)
* Provided written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Systemic contraindications to implant surgery
* Intraoperative complications or postoperative infections
* Missing insertion torque (IT) or ISQ data
* Requirement for a submerged (two-stage) protocol
* Deviations from the standardized surgical protocol or implant system
20 Years
78 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sercan Küçükkurt
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sercan Küçükkurt
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istanbul Aydın University, Faculty of Dentistry
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IAU Ethics Approval 2023/141
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
IAU-OMS-OSTEO-RCT-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.